The State of Tetanoana v. KAVITHA DEPUT'Y REGISTRAR J T;ECTION OFFICER A, \ iL\l '1
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordirgly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as wilhCrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Two CD C oF i,:; Tpk/gh HIGH GOL'RT DATED;02t10412025 j I I .a a .:rr f€ Li^ 01 ,tut. M ( .I .; : k .) ,J (J t );-35,11^ r(,'' \==-.-;:Z ORDER CRLP.No ,4418 ot 2025 CRIMINAL. PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRI\WN blL…
Judgment
The State of Tetanoana, Rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court at ' i:,f.ff; il:'^3,fl:.)'J,lili"Yn' Ased Major' occu s r or Porice, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CtminJ'peiition, the High C;;;;;y; pteased to car forthe records and quash th;;iFii t". rzs otzdzq; ii; iil;r;; Police Station, Nalgonda District. ^52g l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petrtron under Section of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ot Criminat'ieiition, the i,Sn C"r,t';ly ; pleased to stay of a[ further -proceedings or tne fetitioner in FrR No. 123 of 2024 of Kethepa[y potice Station, Natgonda bi"tri.t. - '--"'- ^52g This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri VENKAT REDDY KODUMUR'' Advocate for the petitinner and the pubric prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No..l and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER THE ITONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKAR,AMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 44'18 ol 2O25 ./. ORDER: This; 1le:iticn is filed seeking quashment of the l:lR No 123 of 2024ofF'sKethepally, NalgondaDistrict, againstpetitiont'rr/accused No.4.
Learnerl counsel for the petitioner soug ht perrnission to withdraw the (lriminal Petition
Operative part
Perrnisr; ion. as prayed for, is accorded 4 Accordirgly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as wilhCrawn Mtsc,:llilreous petitions, pending if any' shall stand closed \ To, //TRUE COPY// SO/- V. KAVITHA DEPUT'Y REGISTRAR J T;ECTION OFFICER A, \ iL\l '1 . The Judic al It'lagistrate of First Class, Nakrekal, Nalllonda Dir';t 2. The Static,n llouse Officer, Police Station. Kethepally, Nalgorrda District. 3. Two COs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad. (OUT)
One CC to llll. VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY Advrcat() [Ol'UC]
Two CD C oF i,:; Tpk/gh HIGH GOL'RT DATED;02t10412025 j I I .a a .:rr f€ Li^ 01 ,tut. M ( .I .; : k .) ,J (J t );-35,11^ r(,'' \==-.-;:Z ORDER CRLP.No ,4418 ot 2025 CRIMINAL. PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRI\WN blL v,(
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordirgly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as wilhCrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.