High Court · 2025

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not mutating the petitioner name in online revenue records including dharani by not issuing the pattadar passbooks and title deeds in connection with the agricultural lands in Sy No. 47128 to an extent of Ac.3.3B gts situated at Valbapur Village, Veenavanka Mandalam, Karimnagar District without considering the online application succession-joint agreement of the family members of the petitioner dated

18.04.2023, is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to mutate the petitioner name in the online revenue records incruding Dharani uy issuirlg the onrine e-pattadar passbooks and title deeds by considering the online appllcation dated 18.04.2o23 in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 , Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to Direct the respondents particularly 4th respondent rahsildar, Veenavanka to mutate the petitioner name in online revenue records including Dharani. portal by issuing the e-pattadar passbooks and tifle deeds in connection with the petitioner agricultural lands in sy No. 47128 to an extent of Ac.3.3B gts situated at valbapur village, veenavanka Mandaram, Karimnagar District by considering the onrine application dated 18.04.2023, pending disposar of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI pENUBALLI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9612 of 20.25 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: "--.to issue a Wit Order or Direction more particularLy one in the nature of Wit of Mandamus declaing the action of the respondents in not mutating the petitioner name tn online reuenue records including dharani bg not issuing the pattadar passbooks and title deeds in connection uith the agicaltural lands in Sg.No.47/ 28 to an extent of Ac.3.38 gts situated at Valbapur Village, Veenauanka Mandalam, Kaimnagar Distict utithout consideing the online application succession joint agreement of the familg members of the petitioner dated 18.04.2023 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principtes of natural lustice and also uiolatlue of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 3O0A ol Constirution of India and consequentlg direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to mutate the petitioner's name in the online reuenue records including Dharani bg issuing the online e-pottadar passbooks and title deeds bg considering the online application dated 18.04.2O23 in the interest of justice and to pass... "

2. It is stated that the petitioner's grandfather namely Gopuraju Ailaiah is the absolute owner and possessor of the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.7.37 guntas in Sy.No.47/F-2 (Bancharai) situated at Valbhapur Village of Veenavanka Mandal, Kariminagar District. During the lifetime of the petitioner's grandfather, when disputes arose over the subject property, the petitioner's grandfather filed an Appeal uide No.D /51a 12012 before the Revenue Divisional Oflicer, 2 __ -_l Karimnagar questioning the orders passed by the Tahsil dar uid,e Proc.No.B/869/1989, dated 19.06. 1993. The said appeal was disposet of, after contest, directing the Tahsildar to trace out the Proc.No. B / 869 I 1989 and fix up the responsibility and take appropriate action. It is stated that tl.e petitioner has submitted a representation dated 18.o4.2023 before the Tahsildar seeking for issuance of the pouthi Izafa/ succession certilicate and consequentiar amendment of revenue record and issuance of Pattadar passbook. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receipt of the said representation, the respondent authorities did not consider the same.

3. Considered the submissions of the leamed counsel for the petitioner and iearned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and with their consent this writ petition was disposed at the admission stage.

4. Learned. Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has submitted that for mutation of entries in the revenue records i.e., sale/ gift /mortgage/ succession/ survivorship/inheritance and by way of court decree, the petitioner has to submit al online application in approprlate module of Dharani portal in terms of CCLA,s I I I I I I 3 Circular No.ll2O2l, dated 15-01-2021 and Circular No.1 /2024, dated 28.02.2024. Learned Assistant Government Pleader further submits that if the joint consensus agreement of the family members speciSring the individual shares is enclosed to the said application, the same would be considered in accordance with law.

5. As per Section 6 of the ROR Act, 2O2O, ar,y person or persons who acquire rights over land through succession, I survivorship, inheritance and seeking to effect change in Record i of Rights, after arriving at consensus among all the legal heirs on the manner of division of the land arnong themselves, shall make an application, enclosing the joint agreement specifying individual shares, to the Tahsildar through the website prescribed for this purpose, for allotting available date and time as per the coqvenience of the persons to appear before the Tahsildar. In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it 6. appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the i petitioner to make an application in Dharani web portal in the prescribed proforma for grant.of succession/Pouthi lzafa and consequential mutation of the properties. If the conditions laid 4 t down under Section 6 of the ROR Act, 2O2O are fulfilled by the petitioner, respondent No.4 is directed to examine the same and after issuing notice to all the interested persons and aJter considering their objections and if there is no order restraining for granting succession/Pouthi Izafa, pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of the ROR Act, 2O2O, within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of application. 7- With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. I To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.K. SREE RAMA MURTHY PLITY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER .l

1. The Pri.ncipal . Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad I

2. The District Collector, Karimnagar District at Karimnagar 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar Division, Karimnagar District 4. The Tahsildar and Joint Sub Registrar, Veenavaka Mandalam, Karimnagar District.

5. One CC to SRI PENUBALLT RAMESH BABU, Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies MP BS +M t , HIGH COURT DATED:2810312025 Hr- S T/r / 1 C (,^ o O 2 I APfi 2S25 .: a (: i DE.Spr1./,:tr t ORDER WP.No.9612 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE VVRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ "lrrq--....: ffilu-