'l . M/s. Mallikarjuna Dairy Products PVT LTD v. 1, THE STATE OF AP

M/s. Mallikarjuna Darry Product PVT LTD, Chinakanjarla, Patancheru, Medak Di.tri"t R"p by its tr/ariaging Director Mr.Lakshmi Prasad Lakshmi Prasad, S/o Muthyalu Yadav' occ: Managi19. Director. M/s il;iiii;r,r", Diary Product Ltd kajerla Chinna' Patancheru Medak District' ...ResPondents/Petitioners

3. THE STATE OI: Hyderabad Telangana, Rep by Public Proser;utor High Court ..RespondenUResPondent Petition under Section 359(c) of BNSS praying that irr the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the lligh court may be pleased to accord permissron to compound the offences in c.c.No.335/2009 on ir," tit" of the XtV Addl. Judge,cum-XVlll Addl. Chief Metrcpolitan Magrstrate, Hyderabad and ctose the procLedings in Crl R:C.No .2324 of 12012 duly. acquitting thl Accused in the C C No 33St2OOg on the file of the XIV Addl. Judge-cum-XVlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Nlagrslrate; Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the t.ligh court may be pleased to record the :ompromise and compound the offences and close the proceedings in Crl.R,C,No'2324 of 2012 duly acquitting the Accused in' the b.C.No:SttZO09 on the fite of the XIV Addl. Judge-cunr-XVlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad. CRIMINAL REVISION C ASE NO: 2325 OF 2012 Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr'PC against the Judgment dated 15.11.2012 Passed in crl A No. 155 ot 2O11 oi tn" fil" of the Court of the Special Judge for Economit; offences-cum-Vlll Addl.Metropolitan sessions Judge, at Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated .14.03.201'l Passed in c.c. No. 336 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the XIV Additional Judge-Cum-XVlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Between:

1. M/s. Mallikarjuna Dairy Products PVT LTD, Chinakanjarla, Patancheru, Medak Districi Rep by its managing Director Mr.Lakshmi.Prasad.

2. Lakshmi Prasad, Sio Muthyalu Yadav, occ: Managing Director, M/s Mallikarjuna Diary Products Ltd office at Chinna Kalerla Meddk District ...Petitioners (Accused/Appellants) AND

1. THE STATE OF AP., Rep by Public Prosecutor High Court, Hyderabad 2.M M R /s Gati Cargo Management Services Ltd, tlaving its Office at 1-7-293 .G.Road Secunderabad, Rep by its Legal Executive K Madhava Krishna ao S/o K.Jagan Mohan Rao ...Respondents (ComplainanUResPondent) IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Between: M/s Gati Cargo Management Services Ltd, Having its Office at 1-7 -293 lvl.G,Road Sec-underabad, Rep by its Legal Executive K.Madhava Krishna Rao S/o K.Jagan Mohan Rao, ..'Petitioner/Respondent No. 2 AND

1. Ivl/s. Mallikarjuna Dairy Products PW LTD, Chinakanjarla, Patancheru, Medak District Rep by its Managing Director Mr.Lakshmi Prasad

2. Lakshmi Prasad, S/o Muthyalu Yadav, occ. Managing Director M/s Mallikarjuna Diary Products Ltd office at Chinna Kajerla Medak District ...ResPondents/Petitioners

3. THE STATE OF AP., Rep by Public Prosecutor High Court ., Hyderabad ...ResPondenUResPondent Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleaSed to accord permission to compound the offences in C.C.No 336/2009 on the file of the XIV Addl. Judge-cum-XVlll Addl. chief Metropolitan Magistrate; Hyderabad and close the proceedings in Crl R.C.No.2324 of 2012 duly acquitting the Accused in the C.C.No.335/2009 on the file of the XIV Addl. Judge-cum-XVlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate; Hyderabad. IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the c.ompromise and close the proceedings in Crl.R.C.No.2325 of 2012 duly acqurtting the Accused in the C.C .No.336/2009 cn the frle of the XIV Addl. Judge-cum-XVlll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate; l-ly,6"rrbud. Gounsel for the Petitioners in both Cases :Sri S. Laxmikanth Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 in both Cases: Sri E. Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 in both Cases: Sri V M M Chary The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.2324 AND 2325 of 2OL2 c MMON ORDER:- These Criminal Revision Cases are I'iled against the judgment dated 15.11.2072 in Criminal Appeal Nos.154 ol 2O1l and 155 of 2O1l on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences-cum-VIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad (for short, "the appellate Court") in conhrming the judgment dated 14.03.2011 in C.C.No.336 of 2OO9 on the iile of the learned XIV Additional Judge-cum-XVlll Additional Chiei Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad (for short, "the trial Court").

2. Heard Sri S.Laxmikanth, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri V.M.M Chary, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Sri E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent- State. Perused the record.

3. Since the petitioners/ accused in both the revisions are one and the same, they are heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners and unofltcial res,poq{en!.No.2, in 2 one voicc-, su t,m ittcd that both the parties have compromised the mattcr :rn,l .rccordingly, I.A.Nos. I and 2 of |2024 are filed seeking to cornpound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiablt llrstrumcnts Act and Lo set aside the impugned judgment.

5. Thc pe[itioner and unofficial respondent N,>.2 are present before this Corrrt and identified by their respectiv<: counsel and they havc asse lted thr: terms of compromise

6. Lcar-ned r:oLu.lscl for the petitioner, by fi1ing the memo vide U.S.R.No. 13O1(fl ol 2024, submittcd that in conrpliance of the ordcr datr:d 06.12.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioner had depositecl ar) arrounL of Rs.35,O00/- to the crectit of the High Court Lcgal Sr:rviccs Cornmi[tcc or-r 06.12.2O2,+ vide receipt No.156O and an amounl ol Rs.35,OOO/- to the credit of the Telangan:r FI ig,h Court Advocales Association vrde order INV I 22458583 datcd 26. 1 2.2024. 7 . In vicu o[ the sctLlemcnt arrived at between the parties no purpose u'ould bc scrved in keeping the proceeclings pending. Havir-rg rcgarcl Lo tl'rc enabling provision of Seccion 359(2) of Bharativa Naga rik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (previ.cusly knorvn _ 3 as Section 32O of Criminal Procedure Code) permtssron 1s accorded and the compromise is recorded

8. Accordingly, I.A.Nos. I and 2 of 2024 and these Criminal Revision Cases are allowed. Resultantly, the conviction and seritence imposed ug^i.,"t the petitioners in judgment datecl15. ll.2Ol2 in Criminal Appeal No.154 of 201 I and 155 of 20 I 1 on the hie of the learned Special Judge for Economic Offences-cum-VIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in confirming the judgment dated 14'O3 201 1 in C.C.No.335 of 2O09 on the hle of the learned XIV Additional Judge-cum-XVIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad is hereby set aside. Consequently, the petitioners/ accused shall be set at liberty, forthwith, if they are not required in any other case or crime. The memo shall form part of this order. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Rcvision, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD'.K.SAI ESHI DEPUTY REGI RAR SECTION OFFICER The XIV Additional Judge-Cum-XVlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, HYderabad' it"'Spa"i"f Judge for Economic Offences-cum-Vlll Addl'Metropolitan i""rriJ* Lrose, 5t Hyderabad (with records) il; sr;;;t"-,.rdent, 6nancnatguda central Jail'-Hvderabad' Two CCs to Public pro.""'toilfiiSh Court for the State of Telangana at Hvderabad. (OUT) one CC to Sri V M M Chary, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD CoPies ci to Sri S. Laxmikanth, Advocate [oPUC] " Ft- (alonS with a coPY of memo of comPromise) To, DL 5 6 7 \+r'c4l+ cou B ) EW,J DATED:021Q112025 I COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 1 and 2 ol 2024 INAND Crl.R.C. Nos: 2324 AND 2325 OF 2012 1 nc Sf4 ,(: /a ,; t,B f 15 APn 2025 t t)It;f,ATCH e0 a ('( z a CRIMINAL REVISION CASES AND l.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2024 ARE ALLOWED p.of"a Kt6w ,i t1 lr. ]t It, L It' 1.1 i I l HIGH COURT FORTIIE STATE OF TELANGANA I.A.No. of2024 Crl.R.C.No. 2324 of 2012 Between: IWs. Gati Cargo Management Services Limited' Havins its office at f -Z-zyl''fi4'C'noad' Secunderabad' rep' by ff??;i;;;.utivt r'rvluot'ava Krishna Rao' S/o' K'Jagan - MohanRao. AND ...PetitionerlResPondent No'2 1 Wr. Mallikarjuna Dairy Product Pvt' Limited' Puta"cht"' Medak District' Rep' by its "ii.rt"i*f", iri"".grig oir.ctor Mr' Lakshmi Prasad' Lakshmi PraSad, S/o' Muthyalu Yadav' Aged 50 years' [tairI Occ: Managing Director' N4/s' Matlikarjuna ;;;:|ft ited, chinakaj arla' Patancheru' Medak ;;;; District. - ...ResPondentslPetitioners 2 3 The State of Telangana Rep. bY Public Prosecutor Uigtr Court, HYderabad' JOINTMEMO ...ResPondent/Respondent

1. It is submitted the Petitioner herein is the Complainant in C.C.No.335/2009 in the Court of the XMddl' Judge-cum-XVIII Addl' olitan Magistrate; Hyderabad' Aggrieved by the above Chief MetroP LRi 4 *{q-g* 'C P.c.1pF f rrtS\.^J D -D. Lr^""t' criminal proceedings, the Respondents/Accused therein have preferred the Crl.Appeal.No.l54l2011 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences_cum_Vlll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabarl, wherein the Hon,ble Court dismissed the Appeal duly confirming lhe sentence passed by the XIV Addl. Judge_cum_XTWII Addl. Chicf Metropolitan Magistrate; Hyderabad vide its order dated 15.11.2011 passed in Crl.A.No.15 4l2}l1. Aggrieved by the same the Respondcnt No.l & 2 / Appellants / Accused have prefened the Crl.R.C.2324 of 2\l2,which is pending for consirl:ration. I 2 It is submitted that the dispute between the pa rties are settled amicably out ofCourt at the intervention of the elders by of Rs./.C0{0O /- lRupees ... ......< wa1, of paying an amount L*k+,... only) through 4()Ifl.?.S Eiank Demand Draft Ptru+,rlc6' .{,tL_ (AAo. (f€trL No.OOQOBI. dated .!.(.::l.L:.?e.Upt fa,our ..L}..mgf.t+ "r to the petitioner herein by the R.espondenr No.l & 2 / Appellants / Accused on ...... 12.2024 as full and final settlement in the above case l.o the petitioner herein. Since the disputes betwecn the parties are settled, the petitioner deposed Affidavit expressing jts ,No Objection, to close the proceedings in Crl.R.C.No.232l of 2012 duiy acquitting the Accused in the C.C.No.335/2009 on the fite of the XIV Addl. Judge_cum_XVIII Addl. M) ?C).^-. .-.G- ;;.. -.:.- Chief Metropotitan Magistrate; Hyderabad' The Petitioner / Respondent No.2 herein and RespondentNo.l & 2 / Appellants / Accused herein have no claims against each other. ItistlrtreforeprayedthatthisHon'bleCourtmaybepleasedtorecord rhe compromise and close the proceedings in crl.R.c.No.2324 of 2012 drtly acquittingtheAccusedintheC.C.No.335/2oogonthefileoftheXrVAddl. Judge-cum-XVIIIAddI'ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate;Hyderabadandtopass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. [^ \ Respondents I \A\--+

2. V- Petitioner / ResP#tr#I{o- 2 '1] Y Counsel for petitioner / R@. Counsel for Re on entNo.1 &2iAppellants I i l l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD I.A.No. of 2024 Crl.R.C.No. 2325 of 2012 Bctrveen: M/s. Cati Cargo Mrrnagement Services Limited Having irs office at r 7 zsr, Mr,,;i"ral l.'ii,io*ru.d, re,r. by ;"ffi-il:j-.c,,ivc K Ma;h.", il;L;";i;I",6,T, *,u*,, AND ...PctitioncrlRespondent No.2 I 2 3 M./s. Mallikrrrjuna Dairy. product pvt. Limited, Chinakajariu. parancheru frt.aat Oist.i.,."R.;,,jr:,.i,, Managing I)irt.ctor Mr. Laksluni prasad. Lakshnri prrrsad, S/o. Muthyalu, yadav, Aged 50 years, Occ: Manlging Director',1\,4/s M.iltk;;;#ffi,, ll::l t, pv L. L im i ted. Chinakajarra, p.,r".il*, rr,li,r,,r. IJtstnct. I'he State ot 'l elangana Itep. by Public I,rcriecutor High Court, I lyclerabad. . . . Rcspon dents/petitioners ... Respond ont/Respondent JOINTMEMO 1. It is submirted the petitioner herein is the rlomplainant I I i. l I I C.C.No.33612009 in the Cour.t of the XIV Addl. Judge_cum_XVIII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate; Hyderabad. Aggrieved by S4j..t 'fi, - Re C,' D'n cr,r"ouj' Pf t*vdr. .: ,,.'. Criminal proceedings, the R.espondents/Accused therein have preferred the Cr1.Appeal.No.155/2011 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences-cum-Vlll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, wherein the Hon'ble Courl dismissed the Appeal duly confirming the Judgement, conviction and sentence imposed by the XIV Addl. Judge-cum-XVII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate; Hyderabad vide its order dated l5.l I .201 I passed in Crl.A.No.155/201 I . Aggrieved by the same the Respondent No.1 & 2 I Appellants / Accused have preferred the Crl.R.C.23 25 of 2012, which is pending for consideration. 2 It is submitted that the dispute between the parties are settled amicably out of Court at the intervention of the elders by way ofpaying an amount of Rs. 1-oo'ooo . /- lRupees s / onty) through1.Y........... Bank Demand Draft ^r r (otlLL Fl dAN(E No..ffi00CJ.. dated . . .\.\.: .i k:?{ 1f,ru,or. "f ... A[.L. CAR(rg.. .(rPstl to the Petitioner herein by the Respondent No.l & 2 / Appellants / Accused on

12.2024 as full aird final settlement in the above case to the Petitioner herein. Since the disputes between the parties are settled, the Petitioner deposed Affidavit expressing its 'No Objection' to close the proceedings 1n Crl.R.C.No.2325 of 2072 duly acquitting the Accused in the s-.lo].,*t" SY{:i--18 J,\ W4l .: ir,, :i C.C.No.336/2009 on the file of the XIV Addl. Judlge-cum-XVIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate; Hyderabad. The p,:titioner i Respondent No.2 herein and RespondentNo.l & 2 / Appellants / Accused herein have no claims against each other. It is therefo'e prayed that this Hon'bre court may rre pleased to record the compromise and close the proceedings in Crl.R.C.N c,.2325 of 2012 duly acquitting the Accused in the c.c.No.33612009 on the lile of the xrv Addt. Judge-cum-XVIII Addl. chief Metropolitan Magistrate; Hl,derabad and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon,ble Court may deem fi d proper in the circurnstances of the case S'N ,d -br[.o'ff{-+ OYS*J D'D ch."",'*- t I' Responden ts 1 2 Petitioner / Respe"dentf+* / \$M Counsel for petl{ioner. ,/ Respend+r*}le4 Counsel ndent No.1 & 2 / Appellants