Yadandla Gattaiah v. State of Telangana

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the ci.. umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou.r may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to comprete the investigation rnd fire finar report relaling to F.lR.No.99 of 2017 dt.24.10.2011 on the file of lre 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. K. SURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: SRI D. PRADEEP ,!(,p FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3:-- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.8046 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: "- . -fo rssue a writ, order or direction, more parlicularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaing the inaction of the ld respondent in completing the investigation and filing final repoft relating to the F.l.R. No. 99 of 2017 dt.24.10.2017 on the file of ld Respondent in respect of the Complaint dt. 24.10.2017 made by the petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal, and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to comptete the investigation and file final repoft in respect of the F.l.R. No. 99 of 2017 dt. 24.10.2017 on the file of 2'd respondent and fo pass such other order or orders. . ."

#2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner

#3. [/r. D. Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, submits that in Crime No.99 of 2017 , a final report was filed on 21 .10.2020 before the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Manthani, endorsing the case as "Undetected." He, therefore, contends that the petitioner's grievance no longer survives for adjudication and prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

#4. I have perused the material on record. 2

#5. Having regard to the petitioner's prayer see( ng a direction to respondent No.2 to complete the investigation in the ;aid crime, and in view of the development reported by the responderrl police authorities that a final report has already been filed, it is evident tlr rt the grievance of the petitioner stands effectively addressed. Accordirl ly, nothing further ( rernains for consideration in this writ petition.

#6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as ir fructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shal ;tand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- S. Iil qLLIKARJUNA RAO ASI; STANT REGISTRAR ,!+\-/ //, SECTION OFFICER K. SURI, Advocate [OpUCl R HOME .High Couit tor ftie State of telangana at To, 1 2 3 One CC to SRt. R. Two CCs to Gp FO Hyderabad IOUT) Two CD Cobies ' BM BM HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 I o o t ( * Ir E S il 2 lj Afi 2t}26 * l) \TC ORDER WP.No.8046 of 2018 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS tI FRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6 o CO? PS,. \o c*'