Smt. Uppara Chennamma v. Anantapur Dist
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 19, 226
- Acquisition Act, 1984
Judgment
Cause title
Between: Smt. Uppara Chennamma W/o. Late Uppara Ramappa Gandhi Bazar, Chilamathur Town, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur Dist. ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 The Dist. Collector Anantapur Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Penukonda Anantapur Dist. 3 The Tahsildar Chilamathur Mandal Anantapur Dist. 4 Chinnadeppa S/o. Rangappa Sanjevarayunipalli (V) & (P), R/o. Chilamathur Town, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur Dist. 5 K. Lakshmamma W/o. K. Chinnadeppa Sanjevarayunipalli (V) & (P), R/o. Chilamathur Town, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur Dist. 6 N. Aswarthaiah S/o. N. Narasaiah Sanjevarayunipalli (V) & (P), R/o. Chilamathur Town, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur Dist. .....RESPONDENT (S)
to 3 are Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 compensation amount pending title dispute between parties in respect of schedule property an extent of Acres.1-38 in Sy.No.855-7 situated at Chilamathur Village, illegal, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur Dist. as arbitrary, Violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to refer the dispute to civil court under 30 of land Acquisition Act 1984 regard to the compensation amount in respect schedule to disbursing trying property an extent of Acres. 1-38 in Sy.No.855-7 situated a t Chilamathur Village, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur Dist. Counsel NARAYANA the Petitioner:MR.N.ASWART HA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISIT ION T he Court made t he following : T HE HON'BLE MR JUST ICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PET IT ION NO : 22976 of 2008
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 30.10.2008 // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER JSU To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KBJ} T HE HON'BLE MR JUST ICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PET IT ION NO : 22976 of 2008 Date: 30.10.2008 JSU
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.