Mandadi Sai Sankeerth Reddy v. The State of Telangana

4. lvl Srinivas Reddy, Aged about Major, Occ. Business, Rl/o FIat No.202, Manikanta Apartments, Bhagyanagar Colony, KPHB, Kukatpally, Hyderabad

5. Syed Ghouse Mohiuddin Quadri, S/o. Syed Hameed Quadri, age about 53 years Occ. Business, RL/o. 11-3-928/a, Opp Prince Hotel New Mallepally Hyderabad

6. Gutta Seetaram, Gutta Brahmananda Rao, Age 53 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Plot No. 20, Flat No. 10'1 , Sai Jyothi Residency, Sri Shyam nagar, Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or a direction or a writ more particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Station House Officer, Gachibowli police station, Respondent no. 2 herein, in calling the petitioner to the police station at the behest of the unofficial respondents i.e. Respondents 3 to 6 and threatening to settle the dispute, with respect to the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 01-00 Guntas situated in survey number 136lEl1 at Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Station House Officer, Gachibowli police station, Respondent no. 2 herein, not to interfere with I the civil disputes between the Petitioner herein and Respondents 3 to 6 herein in any manner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 . Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Gachibowli police station. Respondent no.2 herein, not to interfere with the civil disputes between the Petitioner herein and Respondents 3 to 6 herein in any manner in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 01-00 Guntas situated in surv<iy number 136lEl1 at Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Counsel for the Respondent No.'l & 2: SRI G. ANIKETH REDDY, ASST. GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 6: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER r THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. 9845 of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.Aniketh Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.3 to 6 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he had purchased land admeasuring Ac.1.00 situated in Sy.No.136/E/1 of Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under registered sale deed dt.24.08.2022 from its previous owner and the said land has also been mutated on to the name of the petitioner.

4. Petitioner fufther contends that respondent Nos.3 to 6, without having any semblance of title, are seeking to lay a claim to the subject land and are using the omces of the 2nd respondent, who is calling the petitioner to his police station and threatening to settle the dispute,

2. thereby, the 2nd respondent authority interfering in the civil dispute, which is not permitted in law.

5. Per contra, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.l and 2 submits that as of date, no complaint has been received against the petitioner, and as such, there was no necessity for them to call the petitioner to the police station as being claimed.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the petitioner apprehending that the unofficial respondents herein may approach the respondents-a uthorities and lodge a complaint has filed the present Writ Petition in anticipation.

7. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader is taken on record. B. In view of the aforesaid submissions, since, on behalf of the respondents-a uthorities it is claimed that as of date no complaint is received against the petitioner nor any case is registered on the file of the 2nd respondent police station, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed not to intefere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner, and in the event of any complaint being made against the petitioner, the respondents-authorities shall take further action strictly in accordance with law. 3

9. Subject to above observation and direction. the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

10. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- K. SREE RAMA MURTHY ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, The State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

2. The Station House Officer, Gachibowli Police Station, Gachibowli, Cyberabad 3. One CC to SRI ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTI 5. Two CD Copies To, BN v HIGH COURT DATED:0210412025 ORDER WP.No.9846 of 2025 t .3 J o 0 B A;i' iil: -t OEsirr.fc DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ t iq dK