Hold,College Rodd, lr/ancherial Town anci Distiict " v. Agriculture

Heard Sri V. Venkatram Narsaiah, leamed counsel for petrtloner.

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Peddapalli District, to dispose of I'A.No.196 of 2022 in O.S.No.59 of 2022, filed by the respondents/plaintiffs under Order XXXIX Rules 1 &.2 CPC seeking temporary injunction, as expeditiously as possible.

Respondents filed the aforesaid suit against the petitioner/defendant initially for declaration of title and rectification of entries. Thereafter, they have restricted the suit prayer only to rectification ofentries in the revenue records.

In the said suit, the respondents filed I.A.No.l96 of 2022 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking temporary injunction and the trial Court granted ad interim injunction in .,,:. ' 2 KL, J C R.P.No-1056 of2O25 favour of the respondents. The petitioner herein had already filed counter in the said I.A.No.196 of 2022 which is posted for hearing. Even then, the trial Court is not disposing of I.A.No.196 of 2022 in O.S.No.59 of 2022.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on inshuctions, would submit that on administrative grounds, the said suit i.e., O.S.No.76 of 2022 was transferred to the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Sultanabad, wherein, the said suit is re-numbered as O.S.No.56 of 2025 and for I.A.No.196 of 2022, new number is not assigned so far. Therefore, he sought to direct the learned JuniorCivil Judge, Sultanabad, to decide I.A.No.l96 of 2022 (new number is not assigned) in O.S.No.76 of 2025 (old No.59 of2022) as expeditiously as possible.

Perusal of record would reveal that during pendency of the subject suit, the respondents/plaintiffs have filed an application vide I.A.No.408 of 2023 in I.A.No.l96 of 2022 in O.S.No.59 of 2022 under Order I Rule 10 CpC to implead the proposed respondent Nos.2 to 31 as parly defendants in the said suit. However, vide order dated25.04.2024, the trial Court 3 KL, J C.R.P.No.10s6 of2O25 dismissed the said I.A.No.408 of 2023. Challenging the said order, they have filed C.R.P.No.279 of 2025 before this Court Vide order dated 31.01.2025, the said C'R.P. was also dismissed. Further, when the petitioner committed breach of ad interim injunction order, the respondents filed I.A'No.66 of 2024 for detention of the petitioner in civil prison. In the said I.A.No.66 of 2024, the respondents filed I.A.No.164 of 2024 under Order XXVI Rute 9 CPC for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property. Vide order dated 29.11-2024, the said I.A.No.164 of 2024 was dismissed. Challenging the same, the respondents filed C.R.P.No.280 of 2025 and vide order dated 3l.0l.2025,this Courl dismissed the said revision 7 . In the light of the above and in view of the relief sought by the petitioners, notice to the respondents is waived off by invoking the powers of this Court under Article 221 of the Constitution of India

It is to be noted that as per Order XXXX Rule 3A CPC, when ex parte interim injunction is granted, the Court shall 4 KL, J C R P.No.1056 o12025 make an endeavour to finally dispose of the application for injunction within thirty (30) days from the date of the said order.