✦ High Court of India · 25 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Mar 2025
Length
1,071 words

1. Smt. N.Saroiamma, Wo Late N. Venka! Ram Reddy, aged 63 yeais All the petitioners Occ'Agriculture- and R G-adwaltviandal, JogulambaGadwal Distrigt. D/o Lakshmi ReddY, /o Ananthapur village,

2. N.RaiaGopal Reddy, S/o Late N Venk?t Ram Reddy, aged 44 years' 3. N.Srilatha. O7o N1 yqnkat Ram Reddy, aged about 40 years, All ttfe petitioners - bci.nbilcrttuie. ind nyq Anaithapyr village, GadwalMandal' JqgulambaGaQwa! pistrict. .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Tglangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, lrrigation Department Secretailat. Hyderabad. 50002?.

2. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary, Finance an( Planning Departnlent Qecretarit, Hyderabad 5000?2.

3.TheChiefCommiqEioner,Lan!AdminigkatipnNampallyStationRailway. ftead, Hyde1ahad.500001.

4. The Pislfict Qollectqrl, Jogular-npg GadWe! Diqtrict, Gadwal 509125 5.TheLandAcquisitionofficerandSpecialDeputyCollector,PJP,Gadwal' Jggulamba Gbdwal District.50g1 25. l""RESPONDENTS Petitian Under Article 226 of \tte Cgpstitution of lndia praylng that in the circumstanQes stated in the affidavil filed therewith, the High Qourt may be pleqsed to issue an apprgpriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in thenatureofWritofMandSmus,todeclaretheactionoftherespondent authorities in pot depositing the entire decreetal amount to the credit of E.P.No. 16 of 2003 in o.P.No. 531 of 1994, on the file of the senior eivil Judge at Gadwal, as being ille 3al, arbitrary and contrary to the Judgment of Larger Bench reported in 2005, (3) t\LD 233 and consequently direct the respondent authorities to deposit the same to the credit of the E.P.No. 16 of 2003 in O.P.No. 531 of 1994 on the file of the Seni,:r Civil Judge at Gadwal. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 :---i--------r------i-::l-- Petitioq Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affiQavit fitgd ln r;upport qf thq petition, the High Court may De pleased to direct the respondenl authorilies to depqsit the pntirq deoreetal irmount to the cr.edit qf E.P.\g t(i of ,20Q3 in O.P No. 531 of 1994, on the file of tlrq Senior Qivlf Ju4ge at GadWel, perrding disposal o( the mqil wri! petitien. Cq,rn"_gf fo; [he Pglitiorlers : SRI S.AJAY KUl,lAR peq.nsgl fop t[e ResponQent t{o.1 : GP FQR lRRl AND QOMM AREA . Fcq*q! fog !!g nelpo4flqnt {o.2 i q,P FqB FIN+NCE AND PI-ANNING Qqunsel for [.119 Rggp,cndent No.3 !q 5 : G,P FOR LAND ACQplSlTlgN Thq Cqsrt at lfe stage qf admissioQ 6ade thQ following ORpER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITIONNo .9072 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Learned Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for respondent No'1' Learned Government for Finance and Planning aPpearing for respondent No'2 and learned Government Pleader for Land acquisition appearing for respondent Nos'3 to

5. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself '

2. This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer: " to declare the action oJ the respondent authoities in not depositing the entire decreetal nmount to tiie credit of E P No'16 of 2003 in O'P No.531 of 1994, on the t'ile of the Senior Cioil ludge at Gadwal' as being illlgal, arbitrary and contrary to the ludgment of Larger BenZh reforted in 2005 (3) ALD 233 nntl consequently direct tlu responde'nt ntttlnrities to deposit tlP snmc to tle credit of the E P No.16 o;f 2003 m O.P No.531 ol'1994 on the file of tlrc Senior Ciuil Judge at GadruaL." I t Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing' learned counsel 3. for the petitioners submits that in similar- circumstance this Court in W.P.No.11188 of 2023 dated 2"1.04.2023, Passed the following order:- " S.Haaing regard to the same, the Writ petition is disp.osed of and urpondrit N"o.S is directed to deposit the decretal qmount in tefins of thi order and decree, dited 2i.11 2015, passed in O'P'No'43 of 201'5 by tlrc Senior Cit,il Juclge, Wanopartlty, to tlu credit of E'P No 690 of 2015 in O.P.No.43 oi zoIS o" tlrc fLLe of Senior Croil ludge, -Wanaparthy' expeditiously ai possible, at any rate toitlin t period of four (4) months front the daie of )eceipt of a copy of this order' Tlrcte shalL be no order as to costs." I I e

4. Learnel icunsel for the petitioners further pray this (lourt to pass similar orderrs as passed in W.P.No.1118B of 2023 darecl 21.04.202 j.

6. Leanre,l cr)unsel appearing for respondents did not dispute the same. Recor<ling the submission macle b_v learned counsel appearing on either side and in te'ms ,rf order passed by this Court in w.p.No.1118t of 2023 ctated

21.04.2023, thrs r.r'rit petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to deposit the decreetal amount in terms of the order and decree. passed in E.p No.16 of 2003 in () P No.531 of 1994, by rhe Senior Civil Judge at (ladwal, to the credit of E.l, l{o 15 of 2003 in O.p No.531 of 7994 or.r thc file .f Senior Civil Judge at Gadrval. as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four (4) months ft orn the date of receipt of a copy of this ordr:r.

7. Accordineir, this writ petition is rlisposcd of. Nliscellaneous applications, i1 an y pending, shall stand closed. No order.as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/.T. TIRUMA DEVI DEPUTY REGI TRAR sEcTtoN oFFlcEB lrrigation Department Secretariat' Stale of Tqlang?na

1. The Principal S,€)cretary, at Hyderabad. 500022.

2. The-Secretary, f:inance and Planning Department Secretariat, Qtate oJ Telanqana rat Flyderabad 50002? g. The C'nief C:oninissioner, Land Adminlstration Nampally Station Railw-ay' Road. Hvderabad.500001.a +. tne oiitiict bollectsr, Jogulamb? Gadwal District' Gadwql'609125a a 5. The Lend AcqLrisition OffLer and Special Deputy Collectqr, PJIr, Ga{wal, Jooulamba Ga.Jwal District.5091 ?5. toi ttr.e $tate of

6. Tw:o dci t. otl FoR IRRIAND QoMM AREA DEVELoPMENT, fiigfl court 7. Two QC; tc GP FQR LAND AqqUlSlTloN, High Qourt {or the state of q. ij(vo d-Qs to Orj roR FINANQE AND PLANNING, High Court fel the gtate of -telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Telarigana 1t l-lvdelaba(. [OUT] Telangdna al l-lvderabad, [OUT]

9. Qne CC to SRt S AJAY KUMAR, Advoagte toPUCt

10.Two 0Q Copietw To SA BS I HIGH COURT DATED:251031',2025 ORDER WP.No.9072 o12025 -'9---J!:a"-., ,./,11t'E si,+ri 4t.t" 0 4 Ai,rl zu; a\ ,,-.\ '': 15 .l .,.'.. ,,/ ? t) ',:|rl,ltr _ _-,._1- s ..,'-)/ _/ DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION l,vfrHotlT cosrs. \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments