Prosecutor High Court · 2025

PetltionunderSectionS2SofBNSSp,a.ylg..lh"tinthecircumstances cr*i*ip,itition, the High court mav be stated in rhe Memorandu. Ji'cr'"i"i, oleased to stay all tu'tn""p'L""""oiffi i" S 9 No407 of 2024 on the file ot "i iionorable Special court r"t'i[rr"j'"ii'isposal of cases under SC ST Poa Act cum VI ADJ court at L.B. Nagar incrUding appearance of the petitioners / Accused i,"o r"i"'jli""oini oitpo""t oi the above criminal petition

1.A. NO:2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, 1ne nign court .1, ;; pleased to permit the petitioner to_fire the quash petition by comp'Jundins tn"l# compoundable- offences against charge Sheet in S.c. No-.407 ot zozc 5n tne iiie of Honorable speciar court for Trail and Disposal of cases under sc sr poa Act cum Vll ADJ Court at L.B. Nagar. l.A NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petiiion, ft,. iijr, cor.t ,nlr; pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceediig" Oy w"y J compounding the'offences against the petitioner in s.c. No.407 or loz+'on ttr6 riL of Honorable speciar court for Trair and Disposar of cases under sc sr poa Act cum Vll ADJ Court at L.B. Nagar. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K.Ravikanth and sri N.S. chaitanya, Advocate for the petitioner and sri Jithender Rao Veeramala, Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri Mohd. Azhar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'TUKARAMJI I.A.N os. 2AND3 OF 2025 ln/And 4259 oF2025 cRl MINALP ETITloN No. coM MON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BharatiYa Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023 {Ior short 'BNSS' 2023')' seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners in S'C' No' 407 of 2024 onthe frle of the Special Court for Trial and Disposal of Cases Under SCs/STs (POA) Act-cum-Vll Additional District & Sessions Court at L.B.Nagar

2. The petitioners are arrayeci as accused Nos'1 to 3 in the Sessions Case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417 ' 4C5' 406,420,506, 498-A of the lndian Penai Code' 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act' 1961 and Sections 3(1Xfl(s)' 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduted Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Amendment Act' 2015. 3. Heard ttlr'K Ravikanth and Ms'N'S'Chaitanya' learned counsel for the petitioners, tilr Jithender Rao Veeramalla' learned Additional Public Prosecutor, rep!'esenting the respondent No'1-State and tVlr'tt/lohd Azhar' learned counsel fo:' ;esponden INc 2ldeJacto complainant' 4. Pending this petitron' the parties have entered into the compromlse and, accordingly, they m'oved lA Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to 2 A'l"R,.ir \.

1..4.N'o'.2 ad ) oJ 2025 ir/ a Lr|.1,.N0.1259 of 2025 permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the setflement to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in s.c. No.407 of2024.

5. This court vide otder dated 26.03.2025 referred the parties to the High court Legar services committee for identification and to veriff the voluntariness in arriving the setflement. The secretary, High court Legar services committee, has submitted report dated oz.o4.2o2s stating that the parties were identified by their respective counser and arso on verification of Aadhar cards/rdentity cards and the enquiries reveared that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into seft lement/compromise. 6 I have considered the submissions of the rearned counser and perused the materials on record

7. Having considered the ailegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable setilement between the parties and to restore peace among them, in the right of the dictums in Gian singh v. state of Punjab and anotherl and Anir Mishra v. Sfafe of n.p.2; state of Madhya Pradesh v- Laxmi Narayan and others3, this court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of '2012 (10) scc 303 ' 2024 INSC 189 3 zors 1s; scc oae 3 N7R'/ l. ,1.N0t.2 und i ol 202i nl and C.rLP'No'{259 ol 202i the settlement by exercising iurisdiction under Section 482 Cr'P 'C't528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice'

8. Accordingly, l'A Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 ate allowed' Consequently' all proceedings in S C No 407 ol 2}24on the file of the Special Court for Trial and Disposal of Cases Under SCs/STs (POA) Act-cum-Vll Additional are hereby quashed against the District & Sessions Court at L'B'Nagar' petitioners/accused Nos'1 to 3' . 9 ln the above terms' the Criminal Petition is disposed of' Pending miscellaneous applications' if any' shall stand closed' To. SD/- MOHD. ISMATL DEPUW REGISTRAR _qp UrRUE CoPY// vll ADJ court at LB Nasar Neredmet Police Station' Rachakonda sECTloN OFFICER 1. The Special Court tor Trail and Disposal of Cases under SC ST POA Act Cum 3 I[X}3|T iLllii,SJ;;;*,i.i, iign court tor ihe' dGte or reransana at , lj'"l"#iJ in-tl 5 cn'iunv'' Advocate^[oPlJCl ;. il 6c il s'i Mohd Azhar' Advocate [oPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies W Hvderabad (OUT) ABK HIGH COURT DATED: O9tO4t2o2S ORDER CRLP.No.4259 of2025 '' l\' 0 3 sEP 2025 L1",', . - i:-+-*.-.r---- ALLOWNG OF THE l.A. Nos 1 and 3 OF zozs I 4 vD I ! JOINTCO MPROMISE MEMO lt is submitted that the marriage beWveen the 1'lt; p 1) regPondent was' solemnized on 17 03.2017 at Arya sarytej.': Hfierabad., in the presence of friends' and other well-wishers'' rriage both the wife and husband lead their matrimonial life, atitl s3 651/1/10, Chandragiri Colony' Safitguda' Neredmet;i MgC D'rstrict. It is submitted that the 2d respondent has filed Criminql qa9e;Eg ainst. 2) l. the petitioner and his family members vid'e Crime No: '37 Neredmet for the Offences Uts. 417, 42O 4ffi 498(a), 506 of IPC A@ A r-l ar5to-"9 01,-t,9 'of 91 6 fis\fr r!!1EE,- 'a:j. ;:l and'4 2015 2024 beforelh pending. lt is subm 3) case against Neeredmet for pending. 4) ,ltis-srib have se ,amicable,,. separately the above.'ni ,] members. 86 MOU with the 5) tt,is.hum only dUe,.to.di respondent a elders and a allegations le the divoice peti lt is' fu 6) have agreed a continuation of petitioner and Understanding @ /ry' ( ,)c t:,. ,r:l I]: iis' e a. also, f1l9d ano me'No.i 67 of 202 "of BNSS and the. sa,..1 me is ] ,':' ,'r *;.1 r-.3 ir: both:si ' r.1 ... '.by:{'sY. lio,'Ii decid ed tion ofielders of nderslandingg reed 'to ;First,iparly And hisr. fqmili{ sturbances have entered into.the tron of the above said crime is between the petitioners and 2"d re. sorted out on the advice of the dent decided , to withdraw. all .the C iffitioiers.l ,accused and separated and filed onSent'. , , .,'. ,.. .. I tnatr!.lret Ootf, 1!t petitioner and 2nd respondent , separqtion.the marital re lation. Therefore the ose and therefore the an lvlemorandum of ase will not serve any purp dent have entered into Ui T ,1" n'l' "g '' Tul \_-- ,t+' ;',. '.i, .t., .'ai .r: I i a ll,lr; ,tn"'''e cf-ipjgalicases Slrsppaial Cotl before court 'of a Petition. before, B) ,ltissu Rs. i8,OO;OOO/r, admeqSJ.f N_ayipet vil "ent .,,: ,: .9,)r Manlal; T11tr7f'230541 .exgpL(e Regd. "D M Bal a i Divorce.l-:[tie- t: igh C{u(,'r,. ,petiti J ::.in :a . 67' {o-;pqY nd ralso.:,Ag lgsd:. to tf)p :Southern rOisJric!;* out of Ac- 1-35 gts., on southern part.' 'provide pathway from adjacent Agricultu the parties hereby agreed that tne:Peti 4,0O;OO0/- (RuPeee Four Lakhs Only) .at the, Quaih . Petition. in respect of quashing '.No. 407 of 2024 and Crime No. '67 of :....'

2.925, rPetition shall be'filed on the same day:.' , 0001 shall bePaid at the tirne of obtaining'M nt hereby agreed for the same. .' 'ab 6 T y"

6.a Cr5"6-nS, a,g? _-J t ;:. :r_.t!'q!-i!t r-1-*-- __-. ^ '.1. : I ; I I i f1;; r.TL"r'*i respond6h mentione.da,''1! 12) The 2d the above menti appear before Divorce. i Faili Regd. s date'of heaiin writing,'Wh hereby agr.eed 13) !t ris compla aboVel but the wa It is the the compromisd offences against Special Court fo ADJ Court at,L..B..r Court may.d a .t I lB.L. MANASA;lr Second Farty f t.- a"t <iu I p e :i a ! with; r*consent cancel shall. inii niate' the respondent thr ggment.,aThe 2"d reEqg!'l dent : Ieqpondent /.:,Defacto tdjthe ac6used in viqw:of.lhe qrpgse yyill be sotv.e$1 if tire : tion is continued it is nothing ib Courts G-ourt may be pleased to record s, by way of compounding the of 2024 on the file of Hon'ble s;under SC ST Poa Act cum Vil g{ ofder.or orders as this Hon'ble of the case /+- f,'tJh .\) {ALAPATI SANTOSH KUMARI t ,,,: ,1 a I l l' .: .a. .,1.' ,t: 1i'