The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the I igh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction or directions ffiore pri rticularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the n:r pondent in issuing proceedings in O.O.No. 308/05/Estt-1 , dt. 3-8-2005 as it tgat, arbitrary, and violative of Art. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia ancl also contrary to the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court in the writ petition No. 41 5 ]/91 and 15378192 confirmed in writ appeals No. 252198 and 261/98. 2 0F 2005) l.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cin,r mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings O.O.No. 308/05/Estt-1 dt. 3-8-2005. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. B.MANJULATHA VEDAVAU y Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Ms. CHINTALAPUDI .AKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 5: SRt D.V.SITHARAM lvl ,RTHY Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: - The Court made the following: ORDER KUMARI, SC Fo I FCI I i) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO wRIT PETITIoN r{o.22 944 F20o5 ORPER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 2g.0g.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be risted on 04.0g.2025 under the caption "For Dismissal". Subsequenuy, on 08.09.2025, the matter was directed to be posted to 15.09.202s under the same caption, i.e., ..For Dismissar,,. 2- Today,. though the matter is risted under the caption "For Dismissal", there is no representation on beharf of the petitioners. 3 On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents informed this court that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ petition has become infructuous. 4' In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- M.NAG ASSISTANT R R N OFFICER B.MANJULATHA VE DAVALLY ,Ad ca CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KU MAR SC D.V.SITHARAM MURTHY, Advocate M.VIJAYA KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC oPUCI R FCt [OPucl I C \ '1. One CC to Ms. 2. One CC to Ms. 3. One CC to SRt 4. One CC to SRI 5. Two CD Copies K. To PS 6r HIGH COURT DATED:1 5l0gl2025 / I ORDER WP.No.22944 ot 2005 1 iSTr ,/<, 42 "'t // ? 1 iAN ?126 .) a 'l .(':,t:,:Ll\1 :rz (-t' Z It _b DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS o I ? ^,t,