Judicature Of Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Electricity Act, 2003 ss. 126(5), 126(6)
Judgment
Cause title
The petition coming on for orders as to admission, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed therein and upon hearing the arguments of MR.Ch.Jagannadha Rao Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. K.Ravinder Kumar Advocate, SC for APSDCPL on behalf of the respondents. The Court made the following
ORDER:
Sri K.Ravinder Kumar takes notice for respondents and seeks time till 20-1-2004 to get instructions in the matter. Post the writ petition for admission on 20-1-2004 in Motion List. In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed to restore power supply to petitioner’s service NO.00484 , category III subject petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees fifty thousand only) within a period of one week from today. IN default of which, this order shall stand vacated.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
The Assistant Divisional Engineer)Operation) NPDCL, Cherial, Warangal District
The Superintending Engineer, (Operation) Warangal District 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (D.P.E.) Warangal District (R1 to R3 BY RPAD)
One Spare Copy YVN
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Electricity Act, 2003 — ss. 126(5), 126(6).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Jan 2004. The bench was V V S RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.