Board of Education, M.B.High Schools v. The District Educational Officer., Hyderabad District, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or order/direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Proc. Rc.No.4100/D1-5/1991 proceedings Memo No.25589/PS.1/2001-8 dated 05-02-2003 passed by the 3rd respondent, which is confirmed the proceedings Rc.No.4100/D1- 5/1991 dated 07-08-2001 of the Director of School Education as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to hand over the Management of the M.B. High Schools to the petitioners Society. consequential 07-08-2001 Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.SRINIVAS REDDY The Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4036 of 2003
ORDER:
Operative part
When the matter came up for hearing on 05-06-2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it was directed to be posted today. Even on this day also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this matter. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 9th June, 2009 PN/KM HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4036 of 2003 9th June, 2009
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.