✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 10 Dec 2009

Criminal Appeal No. 9811 of 2009 · Andhra Pradesh High Court

Criminal Appeal No. 9811 of 2009P SWAROOP REDDY

Case at a glance

Decided
10 Dec 2009
Bench
P SWAROOP REDDY

Provisions considered

Judgment

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.9811 and 9962 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER : Both these criminal petitions are filed by the respective petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash proceedings against them in crime No.213 of 2009 of Penuganchiprolu Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302, 120B read with Section 149 I.P.C. 2) Heard. 3) The allegations against the petitioners in Crl.P.No.9811 of 2009 are that they have organized for the murder of the deceased and they also provided financial assistance to other accused. The allegation against the petitioners in Crl.P.No.9962 of 2009 is that they have given shelter to the other accused in the case. 4) The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is absolutely no material against the present petitioners and as such proceedings against them can be quashed. 5) The learned Public Prosecutor contends that there is material on record against the petitioners by way of confessions. No doubt, they can be ultimately inadmissible, but there is other material on record like telephonic conversation, etc. 6) Considering the serious nature of offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioners, it is not at all desirable to interfere in such kind of cases under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings against them and the criminal petitions are liable to be dismissed and the same are accordingly dismissed. 7) The contention of the petitioners is that in spite of there being no material against them, they are being harassed by the investigating agency, for that no remedy can be granted in this petition. They may approach for appropriate remedy. ______________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 10th December, 2009 SUR

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120B, 147, 148, 149, 302.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Dec 2009. The bench was P SWAROOP REDDY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 9811 of 2009). ← Search more judgments