Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous, granting liberty as sought. There shall be no order as to r:osts. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Criminal Petition shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- V. HARI ASSISTA,NT RE AD…
Judgment
Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Crime. Bearing FIR No. 390 OF 2022 on the file of the PS Balanagar, Mahbubnagar. l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' {he High Court may be pleased to stay all further investigation including the arrest of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 herein in Crime. bearing FIR No. 390 of 2022 on the file of The PS Balanagar, Mahbubnagar. I i i I I I I i This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Donkuri Mallikarjun, Advocate for the petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 . The Court made the foltowing: ORDER I i I . : j . -/ HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No.3959 of 2024 ORDER: Mr. D.Mallikarjun, Vadeendra Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. M.Ram Chandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1, on instructions, would submit that the investigating oflicer in the \ subject crime has completed the investigation and laid the charge sheet against the petitioner herein. The same was taken on fiie vide P,R.C.No.2O of 2024 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jadcherla. In proof of the same, he has filed a copy of the letter dated 06.01.2025 of the Sub- Inspector of Police, Balanagar P.S., Mahabubnagar District. The same is placed on record. Therefore, nothing remains in the criminal petition to adjudicate further and it has become infructuous.
#2. ln view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to challenge the proceedings in the said P.R.C. I i I I I I 2
#3. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous, granting liberty as sought. There shall be no order as to r:osts. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Criminal Petition shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/- V. HARI ASSISTA,NT RE AD TRAR SECTION OFFICER
#1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Jadcherla. 2 The station House officer, Barangar porice Station, Mahbubnagar District. 3. One CC to Sri. Donkuri Mallikar.jun, Advocate tOpUCI 4. Two CCs to Public prosecutor, High Court forthe State of Telangana. [OUT]. 5 Two CD Copies. YIR' vA- HIGH COURT DATED:7/'112025 I I I i l i I I ( t ) o \ H1 Sf- A 2 7 FrB 2025 I O5 SPn TCH t9 ORDER CRLP.No.3959 of 2024 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTIJOUS. ( A_: t> L- $cop*:
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.