✦ High Court of India · 22 Jan 2025

Koloyju Krishnalqh v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 22 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
22 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,029 words

6. Sri Ch._Bhagavanthudu, So. Venkaiah, Aged about 81 years, Occ. Retired BHEL Ernployee, Ri/o. MIG-I433, BHEL, MIG Phase -1, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District.

7. Qri N. Krishnaiah, S/o. N. Balappa Aged about 75 years, Occ. Retired BHEL Erployge F/o:PHEL M1G-1590, MIG Cotony, Phase-1, Seritingampafly, Ranga ReddyDistrict.

8. M/s. BHEL VIG Emplolees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Rep, by its Secretary, (Regd No. TBC 724) MIG Phasel colony Serilingampally Ranga Reddy ; I I i I I j ! I 1 I I l I jl*Y&[1'^ituYf;ia',f.il',fi i3Bf, :: jr:s.liffi ,":'?:*;T'";H""n"' District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution..of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in tn"'""triiliii-nLJ inerewittr' the High Court may be or-direction more particularly in the oleased to issue ,n 'ro'ooI'#'*it'';td1; nature of writ of MANDnr iil''o".r"ri"g'inrord"r in Rc.No. 271srzo19-H' ot- holdinq the petitioner liable aro l"""ioii""'i'i.in" "x"nt.of g.2.2023on the fite for Rs. 16,16,9se1 (nupeestt#J"" L"itt''t 6ixteen thousand Nine hundred Ninety "r iii:';"o,in violation of principles of Three only) is illegal, "'o'i""v"="""iil'v'i" 1tt" "i'" and. consequently direct the 3rd natural justice untt resoondent herein to p'ou'iiJ"uf i'ii" reievant documents on which reliance ts those filed by the of action' ,esoecially placed to the petitioner t'"t"i" t"'ift" of petiol nump and MNR "ause enniarv and De No'o "norl,r'tJgltii"6jrr"g;r "ib"aiion ilr"JiLitrnning and educational institution' '"t-"tiO'" IA NO :2 oF 2023 petition underr section 151 cpc praying. that.in the circumstances stated in the affidavit riled in suppoli;ii" ;[ffi'lh1.Hqr' court mav be pleased to susoend the order i" R;'i{;: ;il;'siioia':a' Dt'b'22o23 on the rile or 3rd Hffi;;i,;";oing disposal of the main writ petition' lA NO: 1 OF 2024 petition undr:r section 1 51 cpc praying. thar.in. the circumstances stated in the affidavit flted in suppoii iiitti'p"[it'"' in-e jriot c:ourt mav be pleased to STAY of all further pl.o"""iinit in p;o'""i" of Demand Notice lDistraint order) bearins E.P. No. 01i2024- ti:; e'F-iti n'c'-r'i" ' to-+ztzozt-a dated 30 07'2024 issued by the 3rcr respono"ni-i'n"rroing execution, pending disposar of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH' JAGANNATHA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent No'l to 4: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No'S to 9: -'- - The Court made the following: ORDER ! I I I I i i i i i I I THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.2lOOO of 2o23 ORDER: This writ petition IS Iiled, under Article 226 of th.e Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "---to issue an appropiate ui| order or directton more particularlg in the nature of Wnt of Mandamus declaing the Order in Rc.No. 2715/2O18-H, Dt 09.O2.2O23 on the file of 3rd respondent in the extent of holding the petitioner liable for Rs.16,16,993/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Sixteen tlausand Nine hundred Ninety Three only) is ilLegal, arbitrary, conlrary to laut and in uiolation of pnnctples of natural justie and set-aside the same and consequentLg direct tle 3rd respondent herein to proutde all the releuant documents on uhich reliance is placecl to the pettioner herein to tlle cause of action especially tLtose Jiled bq the Societg and De Nouo enquiry regarding illegal allocation of petrol pump and MNR Tntst for ninnlnq and educattonol instihttion to po.ss... "

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there (.\s a provision of appeal before the Cooperative Tribunal and he seeks permission of this Court to r;r.ithdrau' this writ 0 t petition with a liberty to approach the Tribunal and in the meantime to protect the interest of the petitioner against the demand notice (distraint order), dated 3O.O7.2O24 2 Learne,C Government Pleader for Cooperation is also

4. Havtng regard to the above submissions that the petitioner \t,ilnts to pursue the alternative remedv, this Court is inclined to permit the petitioner to withdraw this wrlt petrtion $'rth a liberty to approach the Tribunal' The petittoner shalt file necessary application before the Tribunal on or before 15.C2.2025 and tiII the Tribunal considers the application oi the petitioner for stay, the responclents are directed no, to take any coercive steps, pursuant to the demand n()t tce. dated 30.O7.2024.

5. with the above observation, this writ potltron IS drsposed o[. There shall be no order as to costs'

6. Mrsctllaneous petitions pending, if zrny, shall stand closed { AS SD/-T.JAYASREE REGISTRAR ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 2 The Principal Secretary, Agricultural and Cooperation Department The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Commissioner, Cooperatives Societies and Registrar of Cooperative Societies, 3rd Floor, Gruha Kalpa Building, M J Road, Nampally, Hyderabad - 500001 qff- I I I I I I I I I i i t i \ t

3. The District cooperative fficer, Ranga Reddy District, 7th froor, e"g^nvil, 4. The lnquiry Officer cum Assistant Reqistrar, Ranoa Reddv District Nampally, Hyderbad gooperatives Reddy District Coopera-tive, Kongaia Kalan, Ranga Reddy District - 501510.

5. One CC to SRt CH. JAGANNATHA CHARY, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two ccs to GP FoR coopERATroN, High court for flie siai6 of rerangana. 7. Two CD Copies BN/ASK HIGH COURT DATED:2210112025 t I ORDER WP.No.21000 of 2023 <..,G==; ii ( :_) I I 1B tt'l 2[?5 Ct .!' a- . -':. ' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?t Ad,i \ oCePJLr

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments