V.Satyanarayana v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, cooperation Department
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 07 Sep 2004
- Bench
- V ESWARAIAH
Outcome
Dismissed
Following the same, this writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
Judgment
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, cooperation Department, rep. by its Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner for Cooperation and The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Visakhapatnam, rep. by its General Manager.
5. The District Cooperative Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Yellamanchili Division, Visakhapatnam District.
6. The Madugula P.A.C.S.Ltd., Madugula, Madugula Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, rep. by its person-in-charge. ....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings dated 23.05.2003 issued by the sixth respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Sec.116-C of the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.6: Mr.T.Niranjan Reddy The Court made the following :
O R D E R: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this Writ Petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.3171 of 2003 and batch, dated
Operative part
30.08.2004. Following the same, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
07.09.2004 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner for Cooperation and The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nampally, Hyderabad.
The General Manager, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Visakhapatnam.
The District Cooperative Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Yellamanchili Division, Visakhapatnam District.
The Person-in-charge, Madugula P.A.C.S.Ltd., Madugula, Madugula Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2CCs to the G.P. for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT)
The G.P.for Co-operation
2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Following the same, this writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 07 Sep 2004. The bench was V ESWARAIAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.