High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the filed therewith' the High Court may be circumstances stated in ift" oleased to issue writ order or ;t""d; more particularly one in- the nature of Writ :ifi"r;;;;; o".irii"g tl'"-in lction of respondent no' 't to 3 for not considerins oetitioners representation. O"iJ"" os- 12-i024 and 30-12-2024 and to rectify the I;;",r;';#0. ov'o"i"ti^g";;";i Jrtt" in pahanies by addins as patta land in oahani records and other ru-r"nr" records in pahanies records and other revenue r#?;'il;p=lt .i p.tit,"r"r. r.r".i and 2 agr'rc.urtural dry land an extent of ;;;.00 gt.- in Sy. 26'lna situateo at Thattikhana Village' Thattiannaram Grampanchayat, Abdullapui'"t fr'f"nA'f ' R'R' District' which is illegal' arbitrary' unjustified violation or prinipriot natural justice and Article 21 and 300 A of lndian No'1 to 3 consider the Constitution uno petitioner No. 1 and z r."p1"'LnLtlon dated oi€-lz-zozq and 30-12-2024 and to rectify the revenue record;;;;;l"iing r""ni pit]i-'l pahanies bv adding as patta land in pahani and otner revenue rJcords in respeit of petitioners No'1 and 2 aoricultural dry land un "'t"ii oi ni'5'00 gts' in Sy' zo /Aa situated at Thattikhana "nuduttapurmet Mandal' R R' District' in iiL;:"iiriil;;;; ,""oiOrn." with Law in the interest of Justice direct tfr'e 1e1o^o1!ents c'l'pln"nuvat' "on."q'u"nity- IANO:1OF2 025 Petition under sectron 15i cpc praying that in the circumstirnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tnulign Court may Oe pf,:"slOio Jir"ct the Respondent No.1 k) 3- to consider the petitidner No. 1 ano z'r:fiesenlulion. dated 09-12-2024 anrr 30-12-2024, to rectify the revenue recorcrs by dereting lavani patta in pahanies by adding as patta rand in pahani record. lno-ot",. revenue records in respect of petitioners No.1 and 2 4gricultural dry land an extent of Ac.5.00 gts., in Sy. 26 /Aa situated at Thattikhana Villag;.fhait;nnrr* Grqmqglclravat, Abdulapurmet Mandar, R.R. District, o"noi"s"l;.fi.J"oi t" main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. J RAMMOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER .) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITTO N No.8695 of2O25 oRDER: This Writ Petition is hled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: "...to issue rvrit order or direction'more particularly one in tl:e nature of Writ of h{andamus declaring the inaction of respondent Nos l to 3 fol not considering petitioners repiesentations dated on 09 '12'2024 a;;rd' 30 '12'2024 aitd to rectify the revenue records by deleting lavani patta in pahaaies by addrng as patta land in pahani records and ' other revenue records in pahar:ies record's ald other revenue records in respect of petitioner Nos'l ald 2 .ri dry land an extent of Acs'5'00 gts'' in Sy'26 "g.i.rft i7" situated at Thattikhana Village' Thattiannaram brzrmpanchayat, Abclullapurmet Mandal' R'R'District' which is illegal, arbitrary, unjustificd violation of principal of natural justice and Article 21 and 300-A of Indian Constitutionandconsequently,directtherespondentNos.l toSconsiderttrepetitionerNos.land2representation dated 09.12.20 24 and 30 '12 '2024 ald to rectif]' the revenue .".o.d" by deleting lavali patta in pahanies. by adding as p*," rrrri in pahani arrd oti-'"t revenue records in respect of petitioncrs Nos'l and 2 agricultural d'y- lurrg an extcnt of Ac. 5.0O gts', in Sy'26 /Aa situated at Thattikhana Village' ThattiannaramGrampanchayat,AbdullapurmetMandal, with law in the interest of R.R. District, i" atco''dT '"e Justice and Pass..." 2 Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective Parties' I I I

3. It is sta.ted that the petitioners are tJle pattaclars and possessors ol agricultural land to an extent of ,\cs.5.00 guntas in Sv.No.26/Aa situated at Thattikhana Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same under registered sale det:d uid.e document bearing Nos.lO61, 1062, 1063, 1O64 of 1995, dated 30.08. 199S. It is also stated that responderrt No.3, uide proceedings No.E/lg85/1998, dated 10.02.19()g, has issued pattadar passbooks ald title deeds uid.e,t patta Nos.75 and 76 to an extent of Acs.2.2O guntas each, in favour of the petitioners. The case of the petitioners is that despite the same, the land in their possession has been classified as [avoni patta in the revenue records, which constrained them to submit an application seeki ng for deletion of the said land, but the respondents ha,re not considered the sarne. It is further stated tha.t the petitioners have instituted a suit for injunction uide O.S.No. 1295 of 2003, restraining the respondents ]rerein from interfering with the peaceful possession of the subject property a,d lor seeking rectification of revenue entries and for consequential amendment of revenue re cords -t) classifying the nature of the lald as Patta lands, instead of lavoni patta lands and also submitted representations dated 09.12.2024 and 30.12.2024 seeking for modification and rectification of the revenue entries in respect of the subject property. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents a-re not considering the said representations for modi[,-ing/amending the entries in the revenue rccords and for consequential issuance of the pattadar passbooks.

4. Admittedly, it is stated that the petitioaers have purchased the subject land through registered sale deed uide docttment Nos. 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064 of 1995, dated

30.08.1995 and their names were entered in tlle revenue records ald pattadar passbooks have also been issued in their favoui. It is also stated that initially the nature of lands has been depicted in the revenue records as patta lands, but recently in the year 2024, the nature of the land has been wrongly classified as lavoni patta lands and as such the petitioner frled representations seeking for correction of the said entries. Thus it appears that there are disputes with regard to the nature of the L,urd, its classificalion and rectification of entries in the r:evenue records ald for consecuential issualce of the pattadar passbooks.

5. It is a settled larv that the writ petition ls not a remedy for directing the respondent_authorities to rectify the entries in. the revenue records or to reclassifv the entries in tl-re revenutj records and for conseq uential amendment o1' the records and for issuance of pzrttadar passbooks. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the action of reclassifying the patta lands, they are at liberty to in stitute appropriate suit before the competent Civil Court and obtain necessary declaration that the subject lan<ls are patta lalds. Thereafter, the petitioners a-re entitted to make appropriate application seeking for amendm,:nt of the revenue records and for consequential issuar.rce of pattadar passbooks in accordarrce with law.

6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall sta;rd closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD UTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

3. 4 E

0. KKS GJP \ The Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, f.S. Thp. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Kongara Kalan, Hyderabad' T'S' The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet, Ranga Reddy District,T S' One CC to SRl. J RAMIVOHAN RAO Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telar4jana' Two CD Copies * - r{tr S lA, ( of( a,^ o 1i iin 2m5 a c .oi..r' J HIGH COURT DATED:211031202s ORDER WP.No.8695 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o)*t' h(*