l . Smt. E.Sudharani v. 1. The Government of

disposal of the Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: E. Ramakrishna S/o Late Bheemaiah, Aged about 60 years, (l )c: Agri., Ryo Sulthapur Village of Pargi Mandal Vikarabad District AND ...PETITIONERyRESPONDENT No., /RESPONDENT No.4

1. Smt. E.Sudharani W/o Late Narayana, Aged: 50 years )cc: Housewife 2. E. Ramulu, S/o Late Bheemaiah, Aged: 52 years, Occ: r;ervice, Both R/o Medipally Kalan Village, Pudur Mandal, Dist: v karabad

3. The Government of Secretariat, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS/PETITI,: NERS/PETITIONERS Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue,

4. Special Tribunal, O/o Collectorate Vikarabad Proper & [ istrict. 5. The Tahsildhar, Pudur [\/andal, District: Vikarabad. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS No.1 to 3/RESil ,ONDENTS No.1 to 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rrz y be pleased to pass an order to Vacate the orders passed in l.A. No.1 of 2021 ir W.P. No. 20596 of 2021 , dt:23'd April, 2021 and dismiss the W.P., {o meet the e rds of lustice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. VIJAYA BHASKAR REI) )Y Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: SMT. S. SRAVANI-I ll, AGP FOR REVEN J = Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: SRI BAJRANG SINGH II AKUR The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.1O596 of 2O2L Date:O3.12.2O25 Between Smt E. Sudharani and another And .. Petitioners

1.The Government of Telangana,rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others. ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri K.Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Smt S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Bajrang Singh Thakur, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 2 This writ petition is filed questioning the order bearing No.D | /42 /RDO IVKBISPL.TBL2O2|.C I ITOS l 2018-(VKB) dateci 2I.O1.2021 passed by the respondent No.2 as illegal and arbitrary. 2 SK, J W.P.No. 10596 of 202 I

3. Learned Counsel for the petitiolL )rs submits that without giving opportunity to the retitioners, the respondent No.2-Special Tribunal has pass:d the impugned order on 21.O1.2021 and the same is contl jrJ ro the orders- of this Court in W.P.(PIL).No.20 of 2021 :ated Lg.O3.2O2I and the impugned order has to be set asLde and remand the matter to the competent authority.

4. On the other hand, learned : tunsel for the respondent No.4 submits that the Tahsildir , pudur Mandal has passed the order without conductir g enquiry and without issuing notice to the respondenl J Io.4 being legal heir of late Bheemaiah and the respond: et No.2_special Tribunal has rightly set aside order passed lry the Tahsildar directing the parties to file fresh petili )n along with documentary evidence showing their relatrr nship rvith the pattadar so as to grant succession in their ,j vour basing on the records and enquiry and without doine the same, the petitioners filed the present writ petitio-,l He further I I I -7 3 SK, J W. P. No. 10596 of 202 i submits that the Tahsildar has to conduct fresh enquiry by issuing notice to the petitioners as well as the respondent No.4 as per the procedure for issuing pattadar passbooks 5 In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of by setting aside the order bearing No. No.D1 l42lRDo lvKBlSPL.TBL2)2|.Cl 1705 / 2018-(VKB) datedc 2I.O1.2021 passed by the respondent No.2-Special Tribunal and the matter is remanded to the Tahsildar, Pudur Mandal for conducting denoua enquiry after issuing notice and opportunity to the petitioners and the respondent No.4 including their personal appearance and pass orders under Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights ln Land) Act, 2025 as expeditiously AS possible within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till passing of the orders by the Tahsildar, Pudur, both the parties are directed to maintain status quo existing as on today in all aspects. No order as to costs. 4 SK, J \o. 10596 of 202 I

6. Miscellaneous applications pending, if er iy in this writ petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII

1. The Prl- Secretary. Revenue Department, G SeQretariat, Hyderabad SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL DEI) JTY REGISTRAR. u \sr cTtoN oFFtcER mer of Telangana,

2. Special Tribunal, O/o Collectorate Vikarabad Vikarabad Drst ct. 3. The Tahsildhar, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District. 4. One CC to SRI K. VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDy Advocate [O: JC] 5. Two ccs to GP for Revenue, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. One CC to SRI BAJRANG STNGH THAKUR, Advocate top _ ll 7. Two CD Copies t.av To MP BS I t HIGH COURT DATlD:0311212025 t o a. !4 E 4 ..\a, () Lt- t; \..!\) \ (.. ,.) -1n + C.t ,( a C ORDER WP.No.10596 ot 2021 DISPOSING OF THE \^'RIT PETITION WIT{OUT COSTS I \7