The High Court · 2025

THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.8635 of 2O25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission

2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: "To issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particuiarly one in the nature of Writ of Maldamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the power supply to the Petitioners property bearing Plot No 86 in Category MIG of the Miypaur Residential Complex in Sy No 20 alrd 28/l admeasuring 258 33 Sq yds srtuated at Miyapur Village Serilingampally Marrdal Rangareddy District as illega-l null void arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to release the power supply without insisting for occupancy certihcate".

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Energ, for respondent No. 1, Sri N. Sreedhar \ Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos.2 to 5 and Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 and perused the record.

4. Today, when the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present 2 writ petition is siquarely covered by the order dated 26.7.201g passed by this court irr w.P.No.26oB5 of 20 18. The same is not seriousry disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondentsr

5. In view ol rhe above, for the reasons alike in the said order, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to r.elease power supply to the Jrremises of the petitioner subject to the compriance of terms and conditions and on furnishing an underta_l<ing to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal corporation within a prescdbed period, a,d if no such occupancy certificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate ac ticn in accordance with law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous ;rpplications, if aly, pending in this writ pr:tition stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY REGISTRAR AS S TANT To, 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 uECTION OFFICER The Principal Sl€)cretary, Power and Energy Depa(ment, Secretariat, Hyderabad-50()022. The Chgrman and Mana_ging Director, Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telang;ana, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. The Superinterrcling Engineer, Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, opL.ration Medchal Circle, Medchal_ The Divisional Engineer, Southern power Distribution Company Ltd., of Tolangana, Ope'ation, Kukatpally circle, Medchal. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Southern power Distributior] ComDanv Ltd., of Telangitrra, Operation, Miyapur Sub Division, Medchal The Commiss,iorer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Serilingampally 21one, Hyderabad. One CC to SRI. NIKITA GOENKA Advocate [OPUC] ,ry / //

8. One CC to SRt N SREEDHAR REDDY SC FOR TGSPDCL tOpUCl 9' one cc to SRr c. IMADHUSUDHAN REDDY sc FoR Greater Hyderabad \rI\ \'r''rter nyueraoao Municipar corporation loeucl

10.Two ccs to Gp FoR ENERGY ,High court for the State of rerangana. [oUT] 11.Two CD Copies / .-..(Along with the copy of court order dt:26ro7r2o1B in w.p.No. 26085 of 20i8) KKS GJP / HIGH COURT DATED:2110312025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.8635 of 2025 $E 5'r,lre 1 !< 2 4 t'1AF 825 a *,. ':(j DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS ./q /'.s ,/J,/1 THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACIIANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26O85 of 2018 ORDER: Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southem Power {1 Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents I to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for 4rh respondent.

2. It is stated by learned couirsel appeiiring for the petitioner as ."vr11 as dn R.\iinocl ltedclrr'. S landins counsel appearing for respondent Nos.I to 3 that the issue in this Writ Petition is iovered, br: the oider of this Court dt.23.03.2O 18 in !V.P.No.9789.of.2C18. .

3. Thei:efore ft.ir reasons alike. this lVrit Peririon is also disposed of rvith a directiol to the respondenrs to reiease the power supplv to Lhe prerniscs ol ihc pctitioncr sul:ject to the complialce of the terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certihcate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occuparcy certificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance wth law. There shall be no order as to 2

4. Consequenth., miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha.ll stand dismissed. 26tr, July, 2018 M.S.RAMACIIANDRA RAO, J