V. Madhusudhan Reddy, S/o. Late v. Srinivasa Reddy, Age

Petition Under A(icle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of .....RESPONDENTS i +:: wRlT OF MANDAMU S directing the respondents 2 to 7 to provide electricity connection supply to tiNos Domestic load of each 'lOKW and above the existing 1No 3-PH service is (l\2001430.o3KW-Cat-ll), thus making a total load of 53KW connection to the Ftersidential Building in Eastern Portion H.No.7-1-6211351 admeasuring 138.33 {iq Yards, situated at Sanjeeva fleddy Nagar' Ameerpet' Hyderabad, T.S,, bounded by North. 40,Wide Road, South' H'No'386/2RT, East. 30' Wide pes6, \,ry'6:st Portion of House. Without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the Blh respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection ta the abc,ve referred premises is illegal anfl qrbitrary' ' l.A.NO:1 OF2 025 Petitiqn under Section 't51 CPC praying that in th9 circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed ln support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents; 2 lo 7 lo provide electricity connection supply to 5Nos Domeslic load of e,ach 10KW and abovP lhe existing 1No 3-PH service is (42001430.03KW-Cat-ll), thus making a total load of 53KW Conngction to the Residential Building irr Eqstern Por_tion H.No.7-1-.A21R51, admeasuring 138.33 Sq Yards, sitLrated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, T S ' bounded by North: 40 Wide Road: Squth: H No.Q86/2BT; East: 3Qr Wide Road; west: portiqq of Housr: without insisting r.lpgn ocoupaney certificate from the 8lh 6espondent pgnding disposal of main writ pelition. Counsg! for the Petitittner : SRI THAKUR RQOPA SINGH Couns-el for the Respondqnt No.1 ; GP FO( ENEBGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 : SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR SOUT}iERN POWER DISTRIBUTIONS COMPANY OF TELANGANA LIMITED Qounsql for tfre Respondent No.8 : SRI K.RAVI MAHENDER The Court at the stag,€r of admissiqn made lhe following ORDER 1 THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA KARTHTK W.P.No.8648 of 2o25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is frled with the following prayer: "To issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 2 Lo 7 to provide electricity connection Suppiy to SNos Domestic load of each 10KW and abbve the existing lNo 3PH service is (A2O0143O.O3KW-CatJI), thus making a total load of 53KW Connection to the Residential Building in Eastern Portj.on H.No 7-1 621/351 admeasuring 138.33 Sq Yards situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, bounded by North: 40 Wide Road South: H.No.386/2RT, East: 30 Wide Road, West: Portion of House, without insisting upon occupancy certihcate from the 8th respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection to the above referred premises is illegal and arbitrary ".

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energz for respondent No. 1, Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and Sri K.Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel appearin L for Respondent No.8 and perused the record. 2

4. Today, u,hen the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated.26.T.2l0 1g passed by this court ir: w.P.No.260B5 of 2018. The same is ,ct seriously disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the responclents .

5. In view of the above, for the reasons a,like in the said order, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to rei.ease power supply to the prernises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy cr:r.tificate from the concerned Municipai Corporation within a prescriberd period, and if no s,ch occupancy <:ertificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate actiorr in accordalce with law. As a seqrel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.T. TIRUMALA DEVI GISTRAR o"^f'T'*' 'J.=tri" OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department Secretariat, State of To Telangana at F yderabad- 500922.

2. The Chairman and Managing Director, Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd, having its Corporate office at 6-1-50, [\4int Compound, Hyderabad 50Cr063

3. The Chief Geni:ral Manager, Commercial Mint Compound TGSPDC L, Hyderabad 4 Tfre Suferintending Engineer, Qperationl Baniarahills Circle TG$PDC L' Banjarahills. 5 The Qivisional l=rrgineer, Operation/ Greenlands Divlsion TGSP DC L, HyderAbad

6. The Aqsista4t Di,,risipnal Engineqt, Operationl Greeqlands Suh - Division /- ' :"',giaf,a0rq{tf :-,{:*.* T The Assistant Fngineer, SE OP l GHYD North / AE Sanjeeva Refldy Nagar, TGSPDC L, Hyderabad B. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corpqlation, Rep. by the Commissioner, 9 Tyo CQs to GP FOR ENERGY ,High Qqurt for the Qtate of Telangana at Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. Hyderabad [9Ur]

10.Qne QC- to QRI THAKUR ROQPA S]NqH, Advocate [OPUC] ;t 1.Qne CG to SBI K RAVI MAHENDER, Adypcate (OPUC) 12.Qne CC to SRI N.SBEEDHAB REDDY, $C FOR SOUTHERN POWER btsrnteurtoNls coMPANY OF TELANoANA LIMITED, Advocate (oPUc)

13. Two CD Copies SA B o HIGH COURT' DATED:21 l03,t201s r'i-: C.C. TODAY I I ORDER WP.No.8648 orf 2O2S * 1Hts slA 16: J( 2 4 fiAr] ?025 z. C) 1) t t D6- * DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAJUACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 26oA5 of 2O18 ORDER: ' Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for 4th respondent.

2. It is stated by learned counsel appqaring for the petitioner as well as Sri R.Vinod Reddy, Stalding counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 that the issue in this Writ Petition is covered by the order of this Court dt.23.03.2018 in W.P.No.9789 of 2018.

3. Therefore for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the power supply to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of the terms and conditions arrd on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation 2 / , within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certificate is produced within such period, it is open. to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordanr:e with law. There shrall be no order as to costs

4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall strared dismissed. 26h July,2078. M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J