The High Court · 2025

1 Smt. Amgoth Hindu, Wo Balu, Aged about 43 years, Occ.Roti Maker, R/o Road No. 7, Singareni Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2 The State of Telangana, Through P.S., Saidabad, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for Telangana State, Hyderabad. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN BOTH PETITIONS ,..RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT IN BOTH PETITIONS j *Glr/ .e, -r/ l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 320(6) Crl.p.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\/emorandum of Grounds of criminal petition,the High court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Respondent No. 2 to compromise the matter with the Accused/ Petitroner for the offences U/s 505(t )(b)(c), 3Za R/w 504, 506 290 and 295 of lPC, in cc No.847412023 on the file of vil Addt Metropotitan I\/agistrate at L B. Nagar; l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 320(2) crr.p.c., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition,the High court may be pleased to record compromise and quash the proceed-ings in CC No.847412o23 on t e file of Hon'ble vll Addl Metropolitan lr/agistraie at L. B Nagar in CrlP No 3864 of 2024, This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RApoLU BHASKAR, Advocate for the Petrtioner and sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and sri A suhas, Advocate appear for the Respondent No.2; The Court made the following: ORDER +: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION No.3864 OF 2024 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No,8474 of 2023 on the file of the learned Vll Additional t\/etropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad

2. The petitioner is sole accused in the Calendar Case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 505(1)(bXc), 324 read with Sections 504,506, 290,295 of the lndian Penal Code, 1860

3. Heard Mr.Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and t\4r.A.Suhas, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/de-faclo complainant

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2/de-faclo complainant filed l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C. No.8474 of 2023. 2 ' :i l. 1.Not.2 o ) r.,1 2a25 infatd (.)r/. P.No.)E61 of 2021

5. This Court vide ordet dated 03.03.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary. High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 06.03 2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace between the parties, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. Sfate of Punjab and anotherl and Anit Mishra v. State of lJ.P.2; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.l528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice. | 2o1z (1o) scc 303 '? 202< INSC t89 3 2019 (5) scc 688 I I I I I I i I I I I i I : t . I i I i ,. 3 N7t{,/ IL1.Not.2 and ) ol 2025 ir/and Cr/.l).No. )861 o1 2021

8. Accordingly, l.A.Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, all the proceedings in C C. No.8474 of 2023 on the file of the learned Vll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused. q ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT RESISTRAR k tt\ / \v ,/ SECTiOTIOFFICER To, 1 The Vll Addl, Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Saidabad P.S-, Hyderabad 3. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC] 4 One CC to SRl. A SUHAS Advocate [OPUC] S. iwo CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,-High Court at Hyderabad (OUT) 6. Two CD Copies (Alongwith a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) VSM/gh Y<- )t'..1 HIGH COURT DATED:1310312025 I I I I I tiE I,a t') a. ( ,! lzstiizo25 ;, / 2 d) .L ORDER !A.NOS.2&30F2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.3864 of 2024 ALLOWING THE IA.NOS.2 & 3 OF 2025 AND DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION .cnx(th 'x,p (\\' '.,/ ,'-B I I I I IN TT{E HIGTI COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD I.A.No. oF 2024 IN CRL.P.No. 3864 OF 2024 BETWEEN: Smt. Amgothu Hindu Wo Balu, Agcd about 43 Years, Occ:Roti Maker, R/"o Road NO. 7, Singareni Colony, Saidabad' Hyderabad. ANI) l. The State of Telangana Police Station Saidabad, Rep., through Public ProSecutor, Honor4ble High Court of Telangana, at HYderabad.

2. Smt. A. Nagma Wo Raj Kumar, Aged about 3 1 Years, Occ: Labour, R/o Singareni ColonY, Saidabad, Hyderabad. ..Petitioner/Accused . ...Respodnents/ ComPlainant' ...ResPondent/ De-facto ComP1ainant. JOINT MEMO I It is submitted that, basing on a complaint given by the 2nd Respondent herein the Police Saidabad Potice Station, registered a case in Crime No'06/2023 for the charging the offence under Sections 505(1XbXc), 324Nw 504' 506' 290 and295 of IPC, against the Petitioner herein and the same is pending before the Hon'ble VII Addl Metropolitan Magistrate, R' R' District at L' B Nagar vide CC No.847412023. 2 ThePetitioner/AccusedhasfiledaCriminalPetitionvideCrlPNo'3864/2024 before this Hon'ble court, seeking quash the proceedings in CC No' 847 412023 afi ,lf I , :l l I I I I I I I i l d ( the same is pending before this Flon'bie court. During pendency of above criminal petition, at the jnstancc of elders and well wishers the matter was settled between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2. The Respondent No.2 agreed to cornpromise wilh hcr to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioner.

3. It is further subrnittcd that, the Respondent No.2 has'no objection to quash the proceedings in cc No. 8414/2023 on the file of Hon'ble vII Addl Metropoiitan Magistrate at L' B. Nagar against the petitioner. As such, the petitioner and the Respondent No.2 have filed the petition seeking Hon'ble court to recor<I the. compromise. Thc contents mentioncri the said compromise petition is true and ' correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. the said compromise is entered with free will and consent and without undue influence from anvone. Hence this joint memo. In view of the above it is prayec that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to Record the .joirrt memo of Compromise and quash proceedings in CC No.84l4/2023 o, the fire of Hon'ble vII Addr Metropolitan Magistrate at L. B. Nagar, and pass such other ordcr or orders as are deerned fit and proper as are 'deemed fit and proper in the interest ofjustice. Counsel for the P fr,#" Petiti Counse.l for the Respondent No.) fr F\eAl"et RespondentNo.z,oe-#cio Sk k.=