Sri G.Madhusudan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

The Tahasildar, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Smt.S.Renuka Devi, Wo. Sri S.Tulasi Dasu, Aged about 46 years, Occu House Wife, R/o.Flat No.505, North East Residency, Saidabad, Fyderabad. Sri S.Tulasi Dasu, S/o.Late Thavitaiah, Aged about-66 years, Occu Advocate, Rl/o.Flat No.505, North East Residency, Saidabad, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oI lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the atfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more parlicularly one in lhe .nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondent no.3 in calling the petitioner and his workers to the police station and detaining htm there for hours together and involving in civil matters at the .behest of the unofficial respondent as is illegal, arbitrary; contrary to law and in violalion of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere rn the civil dispute and also not to call the petitioner to their police station. l.A. NO: 2OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 20110 OF 2016) Petition trnder section 151 cpc praying that in th€ )ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High coL l may be preased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil disprrl l and also not to call the petitioner to their police station pending disposal of - ) above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition. .A. NO: 3 OF 2016(WPMP . NO: 40164 OF 20 6)1 Between: Smt.S.Renuka Devi, W/o. Sri S.Tulasi Dasu. Aoed a -S House Wife. Ryo Ftat No.5O5, North East nesiOendy, I rout 46 years, Occu jabad, Fyderabad. AND 1 2 3 4 5 6 ,State.of Tetangana, Rep by its principle Secretarl. Sri G.lr,lldhusudjrn Reddy, S/o. Late G.Chandra Reddv, 9c9u Kerd Emptoyee, R/o.H.No.1g_42, Kamalir Hyderabad-500 060. The Durldrngs, Hyderabad The Commissioner of police, Cyberabad, Gachibowli, F 1 The Station House Offrcer, police Station Adibaua, Cyb: The Tahasildar, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distr Sri S Tulasi Dasu, S/c.Late Thavitaiah, Aoed about_66 I R/o Ftat No 505. Norrh Easr Residenci, s;idabaa, i{ta,;, ...PETITIONER \ged about 62 years, lgar, Dilsukhnagar, or Home, Secretariat ierabad. abad, Hyderabad. t. rars, Occu Advocate, rbad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High Colr may be pleased to receive the additionar counter Affidavit arong with the marr riar papers in w.p. No.16321 of 2016. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt K.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI B.SESIBUSHAN RA,l Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI S.TULASI DAS The Court made the following: ORDER ! Ii : I l ; i ! I I I I i ; I I I I I I 1 THE HONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.16321 OF 2016 t i ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article226 of Constitution of India seeking the following reliefls:- "...to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondent No.3 in calting the petitioner and his workers to the police station and detaining him there for hours together and i[volving in civil matters at the behest of the unofficial respondent as illegal, arbirary, contrary to law and in violation of Article 14 and 2l of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil dispute and also not to call the petitioner to their police station and to pass such other order or orders as this Court deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court, by order dated 12.05.2016, granted an interim direction restraining the respondents from interfering in the civil disputes or exerting pressure on the petitioner flor settlement. It is further submitted that, subsequent to the passing of the I I said interim order, the respondents have not caused any interference, and that making the interim order absolute would suffrciently redress the petit ioner's grievance.

3. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home submits that the respondents have neither interfered in any civit disputes nor exerted 2 pressure on the petitioner for settlement, as atleged. It is cor tended that, in any event, since the petitioner's grievance already sii nds redressed pursuant to the interim direction, nothing further survives I rr adjudication in the present Writ Petition.

4. I have perused the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the submissions made and in vierv of the fact that the petitioner's grievance has been effectively redressed )ursuant to the interim order, this court deems it just and proper to make , he said interim order absolute. Accordingly ordered and this writ Petitior is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs- Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any. shall stand closed. To, 1 \ JAWAHAR REDDL-- -^ TAT.IT REGISTRAR sd/-l{l ASS |i /TTRUE COPY'/ ECTION OFFICER F \ The Princrple Secretary for Home' Secretariat buildrngri Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

2. The Commrssioner of Police' Cyberabad' Gachibowli' l-h lerabad' 3. The Station House Off icer' Police Station Adibatla' Cybe abad' Hyderabad' 4. The Tahasildar, Hayatnagar Mandal' Ranga Reddy Di:J ict' 5. One CC to SRI K RAVINDER REDDY' Advocate [OPU( | 6. One CC to SRI B SESIBUSHAN RAO' Advocate [OPU( | 7. One CC to SRI S TULASI DAS' Advocate [OPUC] R Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Court for the I tate of Telangana at HYderabad [OUTI qTwoCCStoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortht>3tateofTelanganaat HYderabad [OUTI

10.Two CD CoPies BSR HIGH COURT DATED: 1910812025 ORDER WP.No.16321 of 2016 ' . i{HE S, ]S JIN 2O , ,. -' .:.,. _ c)r;.1 !:\\ i6 -2.!i :.;l ) .f ( i 'i-) \'. *\'. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS @ \vr' \\^b