It4.Suiatha v. The Government of lndia

Petition Undr:r Artrcre 226 of the constitution of rnciia praying that in the circumstances stat,:d in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particurarry one in the nature of writ .f [,4andamus. to decrare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned order No (1 )r2o17, dated 04r1or2017 of the 1st Respondent as communicated through G.O.lr,4s. No.133, General Administration (SR_l) Department, dated 0411012017 in making finar aflocation wherein ailocating the Petitioner to the state of Andhra pradesh (Ap) in respect of the Head of the Department i.e., A.p. Administrative Tribunar under the Administrative Department of Genr:rar Administration and set-aside the same in respect of the petitioner is concerrred as i[egar, improper, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to principrers of naturar justice and further direct the respondents to allocate the petitione:r to the state of rerangana as per the guiderines rssued by the 1st respondent. l.A.NO:1 OF 2021 Petition Under section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the impugned order No.(1)12017 dated o4r1o/2017 of the 1st Respondent as communicated through G.O.l\4s.No..,l33, General Administration (SR-r) Department dated o4r1or2o17 in respect of the petrtioner by directing the respondents to alocate the petitioner to the state of rerangana as per her option pendinE further consideration in the petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI B.KRISHNA counsel for the Respondent No.1 : DEpUTy soLtclroR GENERAL oF tNDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 4 & 5 : SRI B.GOVIND REDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 6 : G.p FoR GENERAL ADMrNrsrRATroN W.P.NO:10501 oF 2021 Between: 1 M.Kalpana, W/c. I\I.prucjhvi ,Kumar, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Co Programmer, Erstwhite enohra piaoE;h Xdr;"i;rtive Tribunat. mputer Purani 2 J Haveli, Hyderabad., Presently working- on deputation in the Oio the High $;;';id"dhaFradesh, Amaravathi, Guntur District' A P N.Srinivas, S/o. Late N-Yadaiah, Aged about 42 years' Occ Senior Assistant' 'E;;t*hil; A"dhra Pradesh p,o.iiiti,iiiu" Tribunai, Purani Haveli Hyderabad'' F;;;;.ily wort<ing on oepuGtion in the o/o the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A P' T.Laxrnan, S/o. Late T-Narsimha, Aged about 42 years, Occ Junior Assistant' E;ili;i6 fi;hra FiaOesrr nJministiative Tribunal Purani Haveli. Hyderabad., F;;;;rilt worr<inq on oepJtation in the O/o the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A'P' .....PETITIONERS AND I The Government of lndia, Rep by its tinder Secretary Department of ^ . P;;.;;;i ;;J Tiaining rrrrinii[rv 6f Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensions bipurtr""i, Lokanayik Bhavah, Khan Market, New Delhi' The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Chief Secretary' Gelr.eral nJ.inaiLiion Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi' Guntur District' The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Chie-f Secretary' General Administration Department, Secre'[ariat. Hyderabad - 5OO 022' The Advisory Committee, Constituted under the.Provisions of the Andhra pi'J'o"irl ir"6rgrnirrtion nil, ioi+' Rep bv its Member secretary' General^^ nifrriritrtion"fsnD) Stateof Andhra Prailesh, Secretariat' Hyderabad - 500 022. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep'by its Principal Secretary' SRD General Affii" i.ilrt,o. 1 s i-t ; oepartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Secretary' SRD General Administration (SR) Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad, 2 J 4 5 6 .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction' more particularly one in thenatureofWritoflVlandamus,todeclaretheactionofthe.lstrespondentin issuingtheimpugnedorderNo.(1)l2OlT,datedo4llol2olTofthelstRespondent as communicated through G.O.fr/s.No.133, General Administration (sR-1) DepartmentdaledO4tlot20lTinmakingfinalallocationwhereinallocatingthe PetitionerstotheStateofAndhraPradesh(AP)inrespectoftheHeadofthe Department i.e., A.P. Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Department of General Administration and selaside the same in respect of the petitionersareconcernedasillegal,improper'unjust'arbitrary'discriminatoryand - contrary to the guid'-'rines No.18(i) dated 29hor2oi 4 issued by the .1 st respondent and further direct the respondents to alocate the petitioners to the state of Telangana as per the guidelines issued by the 1st respondent. I.A.NO:1 OF 2021 petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operatron of the impugned order No.(1)12017 dated o4r1or2o17 0f the '1 st Respondent as communicated through G.o.lVls.No. i 33, Generar Administration (SR-l) Department dated o4l1ol2o17 in respect of the petitioners by directing the respondents to alocate the petitioners to the state of rerangana as per their option taking into the consideration of Guiderines No.1B(i) dated 2911012014 pending ,,urther consideration in the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI B.KRISHNA counsel for the Respondent No.1 : DEpury soLrcrroR GENERAL oF rNDrA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 4 & 5 : SRI B.GOVIND REDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 6 : G.p FoR GENERAL ADMrNrsrRATroN The Court made the following COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON 'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHII'DDIN WRIT PETITION Nos. 10463 and 1O5O 1 of 2O2l COMMoN ORDER: Mr. B.Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners' Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of 2 this Court to withdraw the Writ Petitions'

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are dismissed withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs' AS Miscellaneous applications, if any pending' shall stand closed. /iTRUE COPY// To

1. Two CC's to G P FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATIO State of Telang ana at HYd erabad. (OUT) 2. One CC to SRI B.KRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to DEP 4. One CC to SRI 5. Two CD CoPies UTY SOLICI TOR GENERAL OF INDIA, B.GOVIND REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) SA GJ o. SD/. C. DEEPI ANT R ECTION OFFICER igh Court for the Advocate [OPUC] HIGH COURT DATED:2 4t|9tzOZs COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.10463 AND 10501 ot 2021 .,.,...|:. \:, -, 't3 BIT rus ':is;jArc\ -rt':tl * ,. l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. @t3 YE