Mehdipatnam v. Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 s. 8(4)
Judgment
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court Made the Following : ORDER: Sri B.Srinarayana, learned counsel, representing Sri M.Ravindranath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have no instructions in the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
21.06.2004 ______________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
#1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
#2. The District Collector – Custodian of Evacuee Property, Hyderabad.
#3. The Manager-Officer of Evacuee Property and the Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda, Hyderabad.
#4. The Revenue Inspector, Golconda, Hyderabad. 5. 2 CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 6. 2 CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 — s. 8(4).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Jun 2004. The bench was V V S RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.