Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2009
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 226
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any steps on the representation made by the petitioenrs dt. 9-02-2005 for providing police protections to the petitioners to protect their property in Survey No.72,73 of Karipikonda Vilalge, Hanmakonda mandal, Warangal District from the land grabbers is illegal arbitrary, and viloation of Art. 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to provide police protection to the petitioners to protect their property in Survey No. 72, 73 of Karipikonda Village, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.VENKATESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 2525 of 2005 05-02-2009 Oral Order: As the substantive writ petition – W.P.No. 9761 of 1995 – is dismissed as ‘not pressed’ today, the grievance in this writ petition also does not survive for adjudication. This writ petition is also dismissed. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 05-02-2009 Pvks
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 05 Feb 2009. The bench was GODA RAGHURAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.