The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of Lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the arbitrary and high handed action of the respondents 2 to 5 in forceful dispossession of petitioner from the agriculture property in Sy.No.43/E to an extent of Ac.1.20gts situated at Jannaram Village and Mandal, Mancherial (formerly Adilabad) District covered by Assigned patta granted in 1993, now alleged to be allotted by 3rd respondent/ Mandal Revenue lnspector for formation to the Sth respondent for formation of burial ground and dockyard, thereby dumping the construction material (sand, bricks, Stones, steel, cement and iron)as wholly illegal, unjust, without jurisdiction andior authority of law, unconstitutional, violation of Article 300-A and 21 of the Constitution of lndia, Human Right and consequently direct the responrl ,nts refraining them proceeding further for the aforementioned purpose lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Colr : may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 herein refrain from forcefui drs 1 ossession of land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No. 43lE to an extent of Ac. I 20 gts situated at Jannaram Village, and Mandal, [t/anchirayal (formepl,, Adilabad) District, proceeding with digging the land to raise the basements for I rrmation of dumping yard and burial ground. pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI RAKESH KUM 6 R, AGP FOR RREVENUI Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI G. NARENDER REI) )Y The Court made the following: ORDER +.ran,, 1 I I I I i I ! I I i I i : . THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.9826 OF 2O2O ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constirution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the arbitrarv and high halded action of the respondents 2 to 5 in forceful dispossession of petitioner from the agriculture property in Sy.No.43/E to an extent of Ac- 1.20gts situated at Jannaram Village & Mandal, Mancherial (formerly Adilabad) District covered by Assigned patta granted in 1993, now alleged to be allotted by 3.d respondent/ Mandal Revenue lnspector for formation to the 5s respondent for formation of burial ground & dockyard, thereby dumping the construction material (sand, bricks, stones, steel, cement and iron) as wholly illegal, unjust, without jurisdiction and/or authoritv of law, unconstitutional, violation of Article 300-A & 21 of the Constitution of India, Human Right and consequently direct the respondents refraining them proceeding further for the aforementioned purpose and pass such other order or orders ..."

2. Heard Mr. Srinivas Rao Putluri, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Rakesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Government Pleader for Rer.enue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr.G.Narender Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.5.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to dispose of this Writ Petition in terms of the order dated 07.O7.2O2O 1 t

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and learned counsel for respondent No.s concede to the said reque$t. \ t 2

5. For better understanding, the operative por.r ion of the order dated 07.07.2O2O is extracted as hereunder:_ "Har,'ing considered the above made subm r the learned counsel for the parties, the ollicial r,: directed to conduct a survey, after putting the petit( and identi$. lhe lald admeasuring Ac. l-20 guntir the petitioner in Survey No.a3/E. respondents / surveyor shall take into consideral. memo, if an1,, issued by the petrtioner and als pertainrng to allotment of the buria_l ground while c surwey. However, if tl-re ofhcial respondents wal t extent of the land belonging to the petitioner Par-rchayat for establishing a burial gror.rd, they arr "o-p".r. petitioner. Any construction activitv foi establisfri ground shall bc done only after conclusion of surve z respondents. accordalce u.ith law, after paying . sions of both pondents are ner on notice, belongrng to 'he ofhcral ln the work ) the sketch rnducting the to allot alry .o the Gram free to do so rlion to *re Lg the burial by the ofhcial Post thrs case on lO-Oa-2O20". 6 Having regard to the submissions of br,1 h the learned counsel and on perusa_l of the material available )n record, this Court without making any observations on the mr:.its or demerits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the Writ petrt on in terms of the order dated 07.07.2020 passed by this Court, rlo costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if aly, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII soA+ \f' t .S. GOWRI SHANKAR STANT REGISTRAR \ SECTIoN oFFICER To, I IB,trJffii"t:::crerary, Revenue Department, Secretarii t Buitdinss, , 2. Ihe fdhsitdar/tvtandat F olficer' Jannaram Mandz , Mancherial ( ^ t-ormerty Adilabad) Dist;iecY:nue J. ltle Mandal Revenue lr Jannaram Revenue Mar lal, Mancherial . (Formerly Adilabad) oi.l?8ttto'' : ii:#f,;ii[il:'Ji*[?l"pment orricer, Jannaram rva dar, Mancheriar ( ] iJ"?,iff i:l?a 3#ff,3ll,"Jl"r't J i n n a ra m, Jan naram Ma r Ja r rVra ncheria r 6. Une CC to SRt. SRTNIVASA RAO PUTLURt ,Advocate t( PUCI t I .E i!-{Rq-sffi ', :. '-ir - .. y ,/ Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Telangana, at 8. O-ne CC to sRl. G. NARENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies Bl/ PVL I, I I I I I i i I I I I I I { I i { HIGH COURT DATED:1110912025 t t q ( ORDER WP.No.9826 of 2020 (' 1 l'. U i\ 03 r zut * D,- ,../. 6 >l a lt, // DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I a Ltl ltt--