High Court · 2025

years, Occ- Private Employee, All are R/o H.N-o.3-95, Sri Sri Nagar colony, Turkayamjal X roads, Abdullapurmet Manflal, Ranga Reddy pistrict. ..,..PEITtONERg AND 'I 2 .) The State of felangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, TS Secretarial, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. The Revpnue Divisional Officer, Thurka Yamjal Division, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondent authorities in not considering the application dated-23-06 -2022 and online applicaticn vide Application Nos. 2300001 029, 2300001 033, 2200001 037,dated- 02-01 -2023 to mutate the petitioners name in the revenue records and issuance the Pattadar passbooks in respect of the lands in Survey No.279 admeasuring Ac.S-00 gts situated at Thurka Yamjal village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State is illegal, arbitrary and violative principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the application dated- 23-06- 2022 and online application vide Application No's. 2300001029, 2300001033, 2200001037, dated- 02-01-2023 to mutate the petitioner name in the revenue fecOrds and issuance the pattadar passbooks in respect of the lands in Survey No_279 a{measuring Ac.5-00 gts situated at Thurka yamjal village, AbQullapurmet Handal, Rarliza Reddy Distript, Telanganq State. O:1 OF 025 fetition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circqmstqnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High eourt may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the application dated-23-06-2022 and onling applicalion vide Application No's 2300001029, 2300001033 2200Q01037, daled: 02.01-2023 to mutate the petitioners name in the revenue records and issuaoce tl,re na{tgdar ppsslooks in respecl 9f the lqn6s in Suryey l.!9 ZZe qamgasqfi0p 14c.5-0p gts situated at Thurka Yamjal viltage, Abdultapurmet l\,!q4da!, Rangq Reddy District, Telanganp State, pending disposal of the writ petition. 6pgnse! for the Pqtitioners : SRI P.NOMULA PRASANNA KUMAR Coynse! for the Respondents : SRt L.RAV|NDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The CorJrt at the stage of admlssion made the following ORDER :n:s. HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8435 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the representation, dated 23.06.2022 and online applications uide Nos.2300O01029, 23O00O1O33 and 22OOOO|O37, all dated

02.O1.2023 submitted by the petitioners to mutate their names in the revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.5.OO guntas in Sy.No.279 of Thurka Yamjal Village, Abdullapurme t Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefs.

2. It is stated that the father of the petitioners by name Bommaraju Ramulu (r! Chakali Ramaswamy was the pattadar and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.S.OO guntas in Sy.No.279 of Thurka Yamjal Viliage, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. I t is further stated that the name of the petitioners' father was recorded in the revenue records as enjoyer. It is further stated that after the death of their father, when there was a dispute among the co-sharers, the petitioners were constrained to institute a suit for declaration uide I 1 CVBR, J wp_8435_2025 O.S.No.881 of 2008 on the hle of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Redd-v District to declare them as sucr:essors-in- interest of their lather and the said suit was allowed uide judgment and decree, datcd 1 l.l2.2OOa. The-reafter, they made a representation, dated 23.06.2022 and individual online applications, datcd O2.O 1 .2O23 seeking to mutate their names in the revcnue records in respect of the subject land. The grievance of the petitioners is that even after receipt of the said applications, the respondent authorities did not consider the salne-

3. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and Srr L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader fcrr Revenue appearing lor respondent Nos. I to 4 and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

4. i, Lcarned Assistant Govcrnment Pleader for Revenue appearing for the rcspondents, placing reliance on the written instructions, has submitted that the petitioners' applications have been verified and as pcr the Khasra Pahar-ri for the year 1954-55, the land to an extent of Acs.67.39 guntas in Sy.No.279 is classified as Sarkari i.e., Government Land. It is further 3 CVBR, J wp_843s 2025 submitted that out o[ the same, the land to an extent of Acs. 15.O 1 guntas was assigned to various individuals under landless poor quota and certain lands have been resumed under the provisions of the Telangana Assigned Lands (POT) Act, 1977. Learned Assistant Government Pleader further submitted that the land to an extent of Acs.12.25 guntas was alienated to CCLA Employees MAC Housing Society for housing purposes and the same is under physical possession of the CCLA employees and a compouncl wall was also constructed. It is further stated that the land to an extent of Acs.35.15 guntas was handed over to the T.G.Housing Board Authorities for constructions of houses under Rajiv Gruhakalpa program and now, houses have already been constructed. Further, the land to an extent of Acs. 12.O0 guntas was allotted to the TGRTC uide G.O.Ms.No.130, dated Og.O2.7gg3 and the same is under the physical possession of the TGRTC. According to the respondents, there is no vacant land available for considering the claim of the petitioners and as such, they have rejected the petitioners' applications and no applications are Pending.

5. In vievv of the above submissions and since the relief sought rn this writ petition is only for consideration of the online \ ) 4 CVBR. J Wp 8435 2025 applications and as it is stated by thc lcarned Assistant Government Pleader that thc said applications are rejected, this Court deems it appropriatc to dispose ol this writ peti[ion directir-rg the rcspondent authoritics to cornmunicatc the rejection orders to the petitioners and if the petitioners are aggrieved b1'the said rejeclion orders, they are at Iiberty to avail the remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with Iaw.

6. With the above observations, this Writ Pctition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs

7. As a sequel, the misccllaneous petitions pcnding, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/' a\ ,3Bir'#+""["'Hl[ '/ \ ', st"r,oN oFFlcER 'o ',. ,n" Principal Secretary' Revenue Department' T$ecretanat' state of ' z ii" ol.t'i"t c'ri::t91;1Tfli5:+fl1'?;sff1,1", ,,u,",on' Ransa Reddv I. in" R"'"n'e Divisiq i"irnguni at HYderabad' ret Mandal, Ranga Reddy^District. District. l*::t: gt*SHHJ{jEiiiH'iirit' co.i't t"' the state or rerangana at B'"l"itii JRiJtoMULA PRA.ANNA KUMAR' Advocate toPUcI iwo CD CoPles 4 5 0 7. SA BS I ,c j., _* o 1r, 4 (,, HIGH COURT DATED:2010312025 a) .:Z o 4(ETY o s s' .\s ORDER WP.No.8435 of 2025 c d. DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. /o // ,u ,4 ,/9 /t4 ,