High Court · 2025

Prosecutor, High Court at vears, Occ. labourer R/o' bist-sossos. ...ResPondents petition under section 528 0f BNSS .pr.uyllg that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand'#"t 6'""0t of Crimin-al Petition' the High Court may be oleased to quash tn" protlJ'gi-against petrtion"JR""ut"d Nos' 1-3 in SC No. 156 ol 2o22on the tile ;ilft6 SJnior Civil Judge Sircilla' r.A. NO: 10F 2o25 Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand'#"f ol*oi'ot c'llni'i'r Fetition'the High Court may ".rr"iurtnei proceeaings incruding appearan-ce .of be preased preased oetitloners/Accused Nos. i lil it'i',r;-. t\a-it zOiz on the file of Honble Senior birit Judg" Sircilla.. "t"v i i i I I I , a'. - t. A. NO: 20F2 025 iI::Tt?Aii:ffi :ilrg3,3X,gxfi,?1il*,fl " "Petitioner/RespondenuDe-facto fl :,:?5?$135!;;,l"oourerR,o comprainant in r.A No 2 and 3 0f 2025 1 And .l . Namilikonda Srin _ Businest i; il r.i,.i:.sl?,jli,g[?,Xil]:;l?,,,?:,.,#H:n,ll,.r._".ilfiouo.. : }a :'l{:txx ),:l: ll,l ; :,: 1 ft,,;.ru# ;,,,.,.",t i 0 cc B u s i n es s R,o H N o '|3?l?b:?ii"?!rrill.,.fi "?33if ;klslt:iing;,,#:,,:sss*,oHNo in l.A No 2 and 3 of 2O2S ...RespondenUpetitioner/Accused lffijnt:o"f relangana' Represented bv its pubric prosecutor, t High court at . ..Petrtron under Section rn^theMemor,;;ffi r"i..?,ffi :its:?;Tthecircumstancesstated 3f i','J'fl :""'",i#t,,l=ff [l"Ji;iil;lg*]l:F,:,,':"+dl,::,,[".i::x## ;,",6,r"r,r,(fl t.A. NO: 30 F 2025 Petition under Sect. stated in ,;" ., ",-,.i0=,"i1^d.ii:lri.'#..: ,|fi]i,J-,"lilfl,.:.,,::"r,ilU:liT:; i3r!,:;;:fl",;,:?;il[i":"mpromise "t,t",",ilno quash rhe sc No 1s6 or senior Civit Judge Sircila, in the interlsl Irlir,,"I] This petition comin crounos or'c"r#;,;:;ll:^"1-lor hearino, upon perusins the Memorandum or sn u r ru r s n r xnvin :[r,,I.4 iq: lr:"ill?,? i [,,:r.:,]i:*# ii#:X f# Veeramalla, learned Ajaitional puo[c' piosJcut"or"on oenaf of the Respondent No 1, and of Sri Mr Shakapuram Ramesh, nJ""""i" f"r the Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: COMMON oRDER .i SRI JUSTICE N'TUKARAMJI THE HONOURABLE LA No s.2 CR lMt NA L P ETI NA D 3 OF 20 25 o .3 978 OF 2025 CO ER M d under Section 528 of Bharatiya (for short 'BNSS' 2023') seeking inst the petitioners in S C No'156 of or Civit Judge' Sircilla MON ORD This Criminal Petition is file Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023 quashment of the Proceedings 2022. onthe file of the learned Seni 2. The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos 1 to 3 in the Sessions Case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307' 290' 506 read with Section 34 of the lndian Penal Code' 1860' 3. Heard tr/ls Sahiti Sri Kavya Mukkera' learned counsel for the petitioners' Mr'Jithender Rao Veeramalla' learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No l-State and Mr'shakapuram Ramesh, learned counsel for the respondent No 2/de-facto complainant' 4. Pending this petition' the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No 2/de-facto complainant filed lA'Nos'2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedinOs aOainst th1 petitioners/accused Nos l to 3 in S'C No '156 of 2022 1 . I I ;i'; 2 "

1. r..\u'.) 1a 1 t o1 26-,- u n'" "" "i!i!'! 1s'w'202s rererred the parries ro the r;:.::,,*",,on and ro veriry the " ' Irc oecretary, High court Legar s. This court vide orda. A^.^ _, _ Hish courr ,"r", a"*,llTt^:'"0 vorunrariness,, ",,,,,n",i]."",ilff services committee, ha. .,,n^.,*.^_- the parties *uru ,o"n,l] verification of Aadhar that the parties nrr"'"'0"'o"ntity settlemenucompromise. submitted report dated 24 o3.2o2sstaring -ified by their respective cards ,r. ,;:':;:r,":J" "; - - - Yvr(r rl,,ut coercion entered into willfully and without r

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned perused the materials on record counsel and 7 ' Having considered the a,egations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicabre setrement between the parties and to restore peace betweern the parties, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. Sfafe of punjab and anotherl and Anil lltlishra v. State of ll'P.2; state of Madhya pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned rn vrew of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Cr.P.C./528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of proceedings Section 4g2 fstice '2012 (10) scc 303 'z 2oz+ tt'tsc t89 t zorg (s) scc esa t i I I ! I i I i : 1 I I I ! 3 NlltJ I. Liroi.l ,tntt ) r'l 202i, tfi/atitt Ci.P No3978 01 2025

8. Accordinslv' l'A Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed *T"t'ltll^ all the proceedings in SC'No 156 of 2022' pending on the file of the learned senior civil Judge, Sircilra, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accused Nos l to 3' I ln the above terms' the Criminal Petition is disposed of Pending miscellaneous applications' if any' shall stand closed' ,r?',j#REBi'"+[Ik //TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER To,

2. J, 4 5 The Addl Judicial First Class Magistrate at Sircilla' The Station House Officer'P S YellareddyPet' Raianna Sircilla District One CC to SRl Mukkera Sahithi Sri Kavya' Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Mr Shakapuram Ramesh' Advocate[OPUC] Two ccs to the pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana, at Hyderabad[OUT] 6 Two CD CoPies /loronnwith a copy of Joint Memorandum) Chs/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:09 t}4t2}2s ti1, o c (,j., cI' \ (\'' c 11 q F P ?ffi * DrSr,nTCtri1) COMMON ORDER |.ANOS. 2 AND 3 0F 2o2s IN/AND CRLP.No.3978 of 2O2S / A- 7 ! I4 tl,TlS\}3,?'-:T'+ fli?3;3 AND 3 oF 2025 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD r.A.No 3 -in cRL.p.No. )1tf oF 2025 oF 2025 BETWEEN Shivaraki Narsimhulu S/o Chinna Rajaiah 19e:.32 Vears, Occ: labourer x,'fi ,i,il i i; l iiji;Ti,J,x?.,?,1.. AND ... Petitione r/R espon denU De-facto Complainant l.Namilikonda Srinivas S/o Namilikonda Narsaiah 19",.11 .years, Occ: Busrness 1,i3._1,wo;.!_+.S, Rajannapet, Armaspur, Karimnagar Dist_s05305 2. Namilikonda Narsaiah S/o Narsaiah 19u'.1q years, Occ: Business xro; H.No: 3_43, Rajannapet, Almaspur, Karimnagar Dist_505305 G

3.Namillkonda Sharath S/o Shankar Age;40 years, Occ: Business R/o: H.No: 3_3_74t8, yettirlOOipeta Rajannapet, Karimnagar Dist_sb53o5 r Mandal,

4.The State or retanganf,espondenuPetitionersAccused Repre^sented by its public prosecutor. Hrgn L'ourt at Hyderabad .. RespondenURespondent 1' tt is to submit that the ,r'3jHTffi compraint is that r have given a complaint before p.S. yellareddypet, Sircilla against the petitioners herein Accused Nos. 1_3 and police registered a FIR vide 222t2021 Under Sec 307, 290, 506 rtw 34 lpC, in which chargesheet is filed vide SC No. 156 of 2022, against the petitioners.

2. I submit that the intervention of the well-wishers and elderS Ol the both parties settled the matter amicably out of the court' That due to the said reasons, I came forward to ui'ithdraw the complaint for which I am also executed an Affidavit stating that I am ready to withdraw the above said case'

3. lt is submitted that the matter is settled out of the court' I am ready to withdraw the case against the petitioners considering all the above circumstances this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in SC No' 156 ot 2022' dated on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge Sircilla, othenruise the petitioners and their family members will suffer irreparable loss' That petitioner and be-facto complainant respectfully submit that, the above matter is settled out of the Court and that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to Quash the SC No' 156 oI 2022' on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge Sircilla, by compounding the offense in terms of compromise in the interest of justice and pass such other order or ordeis may deem fit and, proper in the circumstances of the case Hence, this Joint Memo. HYDERABAD DATE:19-03-2025 Counsel for Petitioner Counsel for pondent 4 Petitioner o.1 (N, 5",ini,ta1 Petitioner No.2 (rv, ,'lqsgit* ) ib',uJ g" J4- Petitioner No.3 (N 5hd.t9) ( ^/,/ J5b/obX Respondent ls wrsinhulo)