Represented by its Trustee v. Raik-umar s/o

Judgment

1. 2 Valluripalli Rattaiah Seethamma Charitable Trust, 6-3-871 , Snehalata, prggnlgndg Roa.d,_Begumpet, Hydera bad, Telangana - 5000 1 6 Represenied by its Trustee, V Rajkumar_s/o Raja Ram Mohan- Rao. Aged about'Sa yeJrs, Occu. Business, Rl/ o Plot No. 30, Apama Orchids, lzzaL Nagar, Madhapur, Serilingampally, Kondapur, Hyderabad - 500084. Valluripalli Rattaiah Seethamma Vignana Jyothi Residential School, 4,45, Bachupally, .li,4edchal - Malkajgiri Dislrict, Hyderabad - 500090 Represented by.its Adminiskative Officer, K. Srinivasa Ra6, aged about 45 years, Resideni of Hyderabad. AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....PETIT'ONERS Z. ffe_ O.epgty lnspector of Survey, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Office, Malkajgiri Division, Medchal - Malkajgiri District. 3. The District Collector, Medchal - Malkajgiri District. 4. The Revenue Divigional Officer, lvlalkajgiri Division, Medchal - Malkajgiri District.

5. The Tahsildar, Bachupally Mandal, t\,4edchal - lValkajgiri District. 6. The Mandal Surveyor, Bachupally Mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District. 7. Assistarit Director Survey and Land Records, tvledchal-Malkajgiri District. B. N. Jyothsna Devi, Wo. N. Krishna Rao, presently Residing at 14g20, Brookhaven Pl Chesterfield IvlO 63017 USA Repiesented 6y its power of Attorney K. Satyanarayana S/o. Late Venkateshwara Rao Occ. Retired Employee, Rl/o. PlotNo.90, H.No. 1-6512190,sth Ftoor, Road No.7, Kavuri Hills, Phase-ll, Madhapur, Hyderabad- 50008i.

9. Speed lidyut Ventures Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Director K. Karunakar Reddy S/ o. Lakshminarsimha Reddy Aged abotit 58 years, Occ. Director at i i Spegd Vidyut Ventures Pvt. Ltd., Office at 4th Floor Sen ushi Towers, plot No. 21, Road No. 2, Raju Colony, Banjara Hills, Hyderabac- 500034.

10.K. Karunakar Reddy, S/o. Lakshminarsimha Reddy, Agt d about 58 years, Occ. Director Speed Vidyut Ventures pvt. Ltd., Office dt 4th Floor S<jmushi l9we1s, PIot No.21, Road No.2, Raju Colony, Banjarz tiils. Hyderabad- 500034. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under, Article 226 of the Constitution of lntll circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularl 7 Writ of ltrlandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents. actions of Respondent No.2 in issuing the Notice bearinLl served upon the Petitioner on 15lO3t2O2S (purported ly, wherein it is stated that the Respondent No.2 would demarcation of the land in Sy. Nos. 142, 143, 144 and 132 t Bachupally Mandal, Ir/alkajgiri Division, tVledchal - Malkajgiri t at 10.30 AM as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona principles of natural justice and consequenfly, set aside tlr No. B/ 5561 2025 served upon the petitioner on 151) (purportedly, dated 10/03/2025) issued by the Respondent Nc

r praying that in the High Court may be one in the nature of nore particularly, the File No. 8155612025 dated 10/03/2025), )onduct survey and f Bachupally Village, istrict on 1910312025 and in violation of Notice bearing File 12025 at 5.30 PM l. LA.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CpC praying that in the ci-r urn51sn"". stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court m. ) be pleased to direct the Respondents, rnore particularly, Respondent No. 2 nct to take any further steps pursuant to the Notice bearing File No. B/ s56/ 1125 served on the Petitioner on 1510312025 (purportedly, dated 10/03/2025) rcluding conducting survey on 1910312025. I.A.NO:2 OF 2025 Between 1 M/s Speed Vidyut Ventures pvt. Ltd., Represented bv its )irector K. Karunakar Reddy S/ o. Lakshminarsimha Reddy Aged at rut 5g years. Occ Director at Speed Vidyut Ventures pvt. Ltd., Office at 4tl :loor S6mushi I i I I l . i I I i i l I I L I #lf5;: Ptor No. 21, Road No. 2, Raju Cotony, Banjara Hiils, Hyderabad_ 2 F:[]j[$if ..,,""-f li**'iTits,sit1"l.3fl ,,; j3ff l;B,,ili: ,fr ??Jjis#f, !?, Plot No. zr, Roao rrro. z, Ralu c"r"',iv, Eiii]o'Hirrr, Hyderabad_ ....pETliloNERS/g'h & 1o,h RESpoNDENTS AND 'l Valluripalri Rattaiah seethamma charitabre Trust, 6-3-871 , sneharata, Greenlands Road, Begump"t. ff yJ.rrU"i, T"irng"n" _ b000.1 6 Represented by its Trustee. V. Raik-umar s/o (aja nrm'vJi,,ln'nro, Aged about 54 vears. occu. Business. Ry 6 ptoi.ry; aiiinp"'i''ir''i5iiiiar. i,,jin"rffi"i,/"ritIJli: Seritingampary, Kondapur, Hvo"*bij:tbo&i "' 2' Valluriparri Rattaiah seethamma Vignana Jyothi Residentiar Schoor, 4-45. Bachuparv, Medchar .rr,rirti;gi,.i r;i!iii"i, svl!|"bad - 5000e0 Represented bv its Administrative officer, (:s,i;i;;;"R;6. ;ba a'our 45 years, Residenr of Hyderabad. .,...RESPONDENTSM/RIT PETITIONERS v' r(r I 'rrru'P Department, Secreiaria(, nvleraniJ"

3. The State of Telanoana, Represented by its principal Secretary, Revenue 4. The Deputy lnsoector of Su ye-y, Olo. The Revenue Divisional Office, Matkajsiri Divisibn, rvreocnji _ nilrr<"ttgiii' ;ir#i""" 5. The District Collector, lVledchal - Malkajgiri District. u l[:r[ir"rre Divisionat Officer, Matkajsiri Division, Medchat - Ir/atkajgiri

7. The Tahsildar, Bachupally Mandal, Medchal _ Malkajgiri District. B. The Mandal Surveyor, Bachupally fVlandal, Medchal - tMalkajgiri District. 9' Assistant Director Survey and Land Records, IVredchar-Markajgiri District. 10. N. Jyothsna Devi. W/o. N .Krishna Rao, presenfly Residing at 14820, Brookhaven pt Chesterfierd Mb 630i; uSX R;[rr"J!n,"0 by its power of Attornev K. Satvanaravana slo. [ate venl;i;.,;,il;;; Rao occ. Rerired Emptoyee, Fl/o.-ptor tri, s.,-i.ruo. i"_6yrlrd, ;iil'ffor, Road No. 7, Kavuri Hiils, phase-l, Mad hapur, Avo "iioro---sboo?l'"''" .....RESPONDNETS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 1g-03-2025, passed in w.p.No.8349 0f 2025 in the interest of justice. l I Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI AVINASH DESAI, SENIOF )OUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI M.PRANAV 9:y.ry_"t for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7 : SRI L.RAVINDER, / ,cp FOR REVENUE counsel forthe Respondent Nos.8 to 10 : sRr p.vlsHNUVAI DHANA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E'V'VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.8 349 of 2025 DATE OF ORDER: O2'i2'2O25 Betweetr: Vailuripaiii Rattaiah Seethamma Charitable Trust and others AND ..Petitioners l The State of Telangana' rep. bY its PrinciPal Secretary' Revenue DePartment' - il...rrtf*' ''yderabad and nine others ...ResPondents ORDER: This Writ Petition' under Article 226 of the Constitution of India' is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue a tttit, order or - dir-e1t1on more partiaiartg one in the nature of Wit of Mondamus' \ectaing the action of the Respondents' more ff"i*ilno," iie actions of Respondent No'2 in,iss.uins the 'ir,",'.. f,,)1rn"s rite uo.B/sia/zozs serued. upon the petitioner on I st oi'zozs (purportedlg ' --- -tltrra !!'r!! !!!rq--iffil Page 2 of3 1O/O3/2O25), uherein it is stated that the Res tondent No. 2 utould conduct suntey and demarcotion oi he land in Sgt.1Vos. 142, 143, 144 and 132 of Bachupallq Village' Bachupally Mandal, Malkajgiri Diuision, Me lchal - Malkajgin Distict on 19/03/2025 at 1O.3O AM ts being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in uicl ttion of pinciples. of natural justice and consequently, stt aside the Notice beaing File No.B/ 556/ 2025 serued t pon the Petitioner on 15/O3/2O25 at 5.3O PM (purportec'l 1, dated 1O/ 03/2025) issued by the Respondent I\\ .2 and pass.. . "

2. Heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned Seri)r Counsel representing Sri M.Pranav, learned counr,( i for the petitioners, Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant iovernment Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and Sri P.Vishnuvardhana Reddy, leaned counsel 2.1 pearing for respondent Nos.B to 10 and perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for hear i rg, iearned counsel appearing on both sides in one voice v', uld submit that due to afflux of time, the notice to conduc , survey on

19.03.2025 has attained fina-lity. Thereflore, the , ause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. : ence, seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous. I ( -7 Page 3 of3

4. Recording the said submissions, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. It is made clear that this order will not preclude either of the parties to work out their remedies in accordance with law. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /ai SECTION OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. One CC to SRI t\il.PRANAV, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI P.VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies SA GJP {L I I I I i I HIGH COURT DATED:0211212025 ORDER WP.No.8349 ot 2025 ii.lt. :i i ,/*1 {.) \ 'rl,Z M IEC I' .. .. + DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. (* 9\ \v >o