✦ High Court of India · 20 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 20 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
20 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,286 words

Acts & Sections

Petition Under Article 226 oI the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in .....RESPONDENTS the nature of writ of l/lrendamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.314/Part admeasuring 133.33 sq. yards and Plot No.313/Part admeasur ng 33.33 sq. yards, (total admeasuring 166 66 sq. yards) in Survgy Nos.11119, 11l20,and 11121, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Uqder GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S , bounded hy North Plot No.314/Part South Plot No.313/Part East Plot Nos.30B/Part and Plot No.308/A/Pa4 West 30'Ft. Wide Road., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and conseqllently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service corrnection without being influenced by the instnrctions of the Bth respondent. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under S,3ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affiQavit filed in support of the petition, tne High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2lo 7 lo receive the application and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.314/Part admeasuring 133.33 sq. yards and Plot No.3liliPart admeasuring 33.33 sq. yards, (total admeasqring 166.66 sq. yards) in lSurvey \os.11119, 1112q, aod 11121 , qituated at Khanamel (V), Serilingampally (lvl), Under GHMC, Ranga Rgddy District, T S. bounded by North Plot No.314/Pa1 South Plot No.313/Part; (ast Plot Nos.308/Part and Plot No.3OB/A/Pa(; West itC'Ft. Wide Road. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI THAKUR RO9PA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Resporndent Nos.2 to 7 : SRI N.SREEDHAR BEDDY, Sc FOR SOUTHERN POWER D|lSTRIBUTIONS COMPANY OF TELANGANA LIMITED Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL COPORATION The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.8365 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed, under Arricl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropnate Wit, order or d[rection more pdrticularlg one in the nature of Writ of Manclamus declanng the action of the Reipondents 2 to 7 in not receiuing the applicaton fofiL and relea-se the iruliuidual siruice connection to tlrc pettttoner, the Plot No.3l4/Part admeasuing 133.33 sq. yarrls and plot No.313/Part admeasunng 33.33 sq. yor<ls, (totaL atlmeasuiig 166.66 sq. Aards) tn Surteg Nos.11/19, 11/2O, and t1/21, situated it Xnono^& Ui; Seitingampoltg (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy Distict,7.5., boundecl bg NoAit: Plot No.314/Pdrt; South: pLot No.3l3/part; East: plot Uos.SOg/ part ind plot No.3O8/A/Part; West 30 F-t. Wrde Road., as iuegal, null, uoid, arbitrary an(l consequeitlg direct the respondents to receiue application and to reteaie the ind.iutdual seruice connection uithout belng inlTuenced bA the n_stnrctions of the En respondent and to pass..."

2. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government pleader for Energr for respondent No.1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 7; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.8. With their consent, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.32614 of 2015, dated 18.12.2O15, and requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ petition also. 2 PK,J wp 8365 2025 The same is o,rt seriously disputed by the learned Government Pleader as we[[ as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents

4. In vien of the above submissions and for the reasons alike in lh. order of this Court in W.P.No.32614 of 20 15, dated 18.12.2O15, lhis Writ Petition is disposed ol permitting the petitioner to li1e an online application seeking eiectricity service connection to the petitioner's subject premises r.e., Plot No.314/Part admeasuring 133.33 sq. yards and Plot No.313/Part admeasuring l3l).33 sq. yards, in Survey Nos. 1 1/ 79, ll 12.O, and 1 1/21, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, Telan,g:rna State, within a period of one (1) lt'eel< from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Upon receipt of such an application, respondent Nos.2 to 7 are directed to considr:r the said application of the petitioner for release of the electri<:tly power supply to the pe titioner's subject property within a period of two (2) weeks thereerfte r. It is however observeil that if responclent Nos.2 to 7 pass orders on petitioner's application granting release of the electricity polr'er supply to the petitioner's subject property, the same shall be subject to further direction that may be issued by the State of T<:Lrngana or the Hon'ble Apex Court in the litigation pending before j t arising out of the order dated 12.O9 .2012 passed in Writ Petitiorr lo.2O4O7 of 2OO8 and batch. To 3 wp 8365 2025 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/-T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER HYderaPqd Telanoana at Hvderabad-500022. Compa'ny Limited, ViOyuth Soudha, Sompjrguda,-Hyderabad' 1 The Pincipal Secretary, Power and Energy Department Secretariat' State of z L" Ci;i""an - t" - Managing Directar' Telangana State southern Power - ni.irilrtion Companv LimitedlVidvuth Squdha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad a in" Cnlet Cenerat M'anager, cgmmer9ial Mint Compound T G $ P Dq L' 4 Tie Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution s ih" 0*iJi"nat Engineer, operation Konbapur.r G 9 t ? 9 ! Iydgr.a?l-l. --, 6 The Asst Divisionil Enqineer, Operatibn Kondapur I G S P D C L, Hyderabad' 7 in" niit Enlineer, $ETQP/GHYD East AE oP Allapur TGSPDCL' e. I6e Oo;;missiQner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Cprporation' Qircle 20' 9 T;; ei; to cp ron ENERGY, High court far the State of relangana at ro ci'n" cc to dRl THAKUR ROQPA SlNGtl, Advocate toPucl ii 6;; ce to saT c.MADHUSUpHAN REDpY, 9c FgR GREATER uVoEdnaaD MUNIbIPAL coFoRATloN, Advocqte (oPUC) rz One 69 to sniN.SBEEpHAB ffEDDY, $-c FoR squrHERN PPWER- .-. '- nisln'i'Bilrrolrs OorvrphxY gi TELANGANA LlMlrED, Advocate (oPUc) Tank Bund Road. HYderabad. Hyderdbad IOUTI HYdeiaPad. 13 Two 9Q CoPlQs SA ,w HIGH COURT DATED:2010312025 ORDER WP.No.8365 of 2025 C.C. TODAY rat SfAr€ .\ti 7 ,J l.j -) 2 4 r{AR 2ff}5 \:- . ' * ) DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGET OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. # eLl

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments