✦ High Court of India · 20 Mar 2025

Smt. Kesu Subba Rajamma v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 20 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
20 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,029 words

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not processing the application daled 12.03.2025 lor release of power supply to the petitioner s PIot Nq. 49 in Survey No. 'l 1/19, 11t2O and 11121 , admeasuring 300 Sq. yds situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally IVlandal, Rangareddy DistrictaSillegal,unjust,unlavyfulandconsequentlydirecttheRespondentsto process the applicatiorr dated 12 03 2025 and to release the service connection alongwiththeelectricalmeterswithoutbeinginfluencedbytheinstructionsofthe 6th ResPondent t.A.NO:1 OF 25 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state( in theaffi$avitfiledin,strpportofthepetitiol,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto directtheRgspondentsIto5toprocesstheapplieationdatedl2'Q3.2025andto release the service cr>nnection along with eleglrical meters to the petitioner s Plot No. 49 in Survey No 11119' 11120 and 11{?1, admeasuring 300 Sq yds situaled at Khaname! Village, llerilingampally Man(al, Raqgarp{fly District wlthout being inflgenqed by the inglructlons of the 6th Respande4t Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms' NIKITA GQENKA Coqnsq! for the Respondent No.1 ! GP FqR ENEBGY Counsel for the Reepondent Nos'2 to ! j lEI,$SjEEDHAR iol-rrriirnu iioweH Dl$rRlBuroN opMPA'-{Y qF TELANGANA LlMlrED counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI G'MAPHUSUOHAN REDDY' SC FOR onEafen HYDERAb,AD MUNIcIPAL coRPoRATlol{ The Cqurt qt the st?ge gf admlssign made the following ORDER REDDY' ScC FOR THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.S343 0F 202s ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself

2. This Writ Petition is liled, under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: - "...ro 6sue an appropiate Wit, order or clirection more pe"lTicularlA one in the nature of Wrtt of Mandamus declanng the actton of the Respondents in not. processing the apptication dated 12.O3.2O2Sfor release ofpower suppty td tte petitloner's Plot No.49 in Surueg No.ll/j9, 11/2O and 1l/21, admeisuing 3OO Sq. gd-s situdted at Khaiamet Village, Seilingampatty MandaL Rangareddg Di-strtct qs illeltal, unjusL unlatufuL and corLsequerllLA darect ttte Respondents to process the application doted 12.03_2025 and to release the seruice cor..nection along uitlL tlle electrical neters uithout beiq inJluencetl by the in-structtons of the 6h Respondent and to po,ss...'

3. Heard Ms.Nikita Goenka, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Energ, for respondent No. l; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 5; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for , I respondent No.6.

4. Learne<l counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.9792 of 2023, dated 1 1.O4.2O23, and requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also. 2 PK,J rrp 83.13 2025 The same is no.- seriously disputed by the learned Government Pleader as well as learned Standing Counsel for the re sporldents' ln view oi'1.he above submissions and for the reasons atike in 5. the order of this Court in W.P.No 9792 of 2023, dated 1| 04'2023' this Writ Pctit ion is disposed of directing the resporlde nts to constder the zrpplication, dated l2'O3 '2025, submitter:l by the petitioner, for re ease of power supply to the petitioner's [)1ot No 49 in Survey No.11i 19, 11 l2O and, lll2l, admeasuring 300 Sq yds silualed at KhetrLamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R:Lngareddy District, Telangzrna, and pass appropriate orders, in a':'-ordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably u'ithin a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of t'rLis order' subject to the p:titioner making necessary paymeni, as stipulated undcr the trlec tricity Act, 20o3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stanrl closed' Thcrc shall be n I order as to costs' sD/-T. TIRUMALA DEVI / asstsrarur REGISTRAR / /,\ //TRUE COPY// To vl SECTION OFFICER 1 . The principal sjecretary, power and Energy Department, secretariat, state of as ins Di recro r,-r^e!an€na n a State So uth e rn Power. , ff 5 tt T,liJL'5Ho:il, " Distribution Conrpany Li"it"i] Hi'"s its office at Mint compound' Secretariat' , ?il:"Jt'3flnal E nsineer, Telangana State southern Power Distribution " ;;;;;t Limitealoperation, K;ndaput' Hvdqllb3d 4 The Assistant Divisionaiilfi"t"' i"r"pg91a 6tate Southern Power Distribution cornpany LitiitJJ' opl*tlo'nlrond'p"' Hvderabad' 5 The Assistant engin""','t"iJn#; siil; pouJhern Power Distribution ' ;';;;;;i.ii'o] op''"tion' Alrapur' Hvderabad f k /' Qircle, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

6. The Qommissioner, Greater Hyderaba{ [/unipipal Corporation Hyderabad 7 Two QQs to Gp FOR ENERGY, High Court fo1 the State of Telangana at B One CC to Ms, NIKIIA GOENKA, Advqcate [OPUCI 9 One QA to Q$IN.SREEEHAR BEDDY, SCC FOR SOUTHERN POWER HYderabad. [QUII DISTRIBUTQN C9MPANY AF TELANQANA LIMITED 'l0. One 8.Q to 9El G.MADHUSUDHAN REppY, SC FoR GREATER HYDEBABAP MUNlCIPAL CORPORATI9N, Advocate (OPUC) I 1 1. Tyvo QP Copipo SA BS t I HIGH COURT DATED:2010312025 ORDER WP.No.8343 of 2025 C C. TODAY t I ( l 1i a .\9 sTAre v o q lqun $t5 2 l (1 tt. 0Esi,r\ic\ + :. DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. ?A I 2) Itt

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments