1. Lalam Yamini v. 1. The State of

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be .....RESPONDENTS pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of ltlandamus declaring the action of the Respordents 2 to 7 in not processing the application of the Petitioner to provide for 3 Ph,ase, total Load of 5000 watts, vide Fleg.No. NR915254310363 to the petitioner, ther Plot No.62, in Survey No.11119, 11120 and 11121 , admeasuring 300 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHIr/C, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North Plot No.6'1 South Plot No.63 East Plot No.59r\ West 30' Ft. Wide Road., as illergal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to procerss the application and to release the ind,vidual service connection without be ng influenced by the instructions of the Bth respondent. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumsternces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be.pleased to direct the Respondernts 2lo 7 lo process the application of ther Petitioner to provide for 3 Phase, total Load of 5000 watts, vide Reg.No. NR9'1 5254310363 to the petitioner, the Plot No.62, in Survey No.11119,1112O and 11121, admeasuring 300 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (lt/), lJnder GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North Plot No.61; South Plct No.63; East Plot No.59A; West 30' Ft. Wide Road. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 : SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK wRIT PETITION No.832O OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent ol both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itseif

2. This Writ Petition is hled, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief "...to i-ssue dn appropiate Wnt, order or direction more parTicularlA one m the naturc of Writ of Mdndamus declaring lhe octiotr of the Respondents 2 to y in not processing the application of tlle Petitioner to prouide for 3 Phase, totdl Load of 5OOO lxdtts, uide Reg. No. NR915254310363 to the petitioner, the PIot No.62, in Snrcy No.11/19, 11/2O and 11/21, adneasuring 3OO sq. yardi, sih)ated at Khd\amet (V), SeiltgampaltA (M), under GHMC, Ranga Redd.A District, 7.5., bounded by Nonlt: Plot No.61; South: PIot No.63; East: Plot No.59A; West 3O' Ft. Wirle Road., as iLlegaL, nuLl, uoid, dtbitrary and consequentlg direct the respondents to process the applicatiotl and to release the indiuidual seruice connectiotr uithout being i{luenced bA the irutructions of the &h respoadent and to p(rss..."

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government Plcader for Enerry for respondent No.1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 7; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, \ for respondent No.S. ( I

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.9792 of 2023, dated 11.O4-2023, and requested I 2 PK,J Wp A32O 2025 this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ pctition also. The same is not seriously disputed by the learned ( iovernment Pleader as well as learned Standing Counsel for the resp,:ndents.

5. In view of the above submissions and for the rcasc,ns alike in the order o1'this Court in W.p.No.9792 of 2023, dated I 1,.O4.2023, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respr:,ndents to consider the application, dated 0g.03.2025, submittr:d by the petitioners, frrr providing 3 phase, totar Load of 5oo0 .r,r,atts, uide Reg.No.NRg 1ltil543 10363 to the petitioners, plot No.62, in Survey No.11/19, lIl'.2O and 71/21, admeasuring 3OO sq. yard:;, siruated at Khanamet (\/), Serilingampally (M), under GHMC, Rarrga Reddy District, Telangana, and pass appropriate orders, rn a,:corclance with law, as e;<peditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two (21 wecks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioners making necessary payment, as s;tipulated under the Electricity Act, 2OO3. Miscellanc-ous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Therb Shall be no order as to cost S. SD/- P. PADMANABHA ASSISTANT REG EDDY TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Telangana at Hyderabad-500022.

1. The Principal Ser:retary, Power and Energy Department Secretariat, State of 2. The Chairman -- 3um - Managing Director, Telangana State Southern power Distribution Cornpany Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hylerabad. 3. The Chief General Manager, commercial [Vlint Compound T G S p D C L, Hyderabad.

4. The SuperintenCing Engineer, Telangana State Southern power Distribution Company Limibcl, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 5. The Divisional E:ngineer, Operation Kondapur T.G.S.P.D.C_L 6. The Asst Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur T G S P D C L 7. The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur T G S p D C L \ To a ]i$ B. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Circle 20, Tank

9. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Bund Road, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. [OUT] 10 One CC to SRI THAKUR ROOPA S|NGH, Advocate [OPUC] 1 1 . One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, Advocate (OpUCC)c 12. One CC to SRI c.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, Advocate (OPUC)C 13.Two CD Copies SA GJP @* t C.C. TODAY I I y\a S IA, € 1 ( ; ?1 HAfl ttzs c) -b .-. * HIGH COURT DATE D : 1 910312025 ORDER WP.No.8320 o12025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS.