✦ High Court of India · 10 Nov 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 10 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
10 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,761 words

1 . Banuru Raghupathi, S/o. Bhanoor Kistaiah, Aged abou-t . 33 Years, Occ Asriculture, Rt/o. D. No. 1-9s (Old No. 6-70), XIiO"*"-VirhgL, cJiin"r,eru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

2. Bhanoor Sandeep Kumar, S/o. Bhanoor Narsimhulu, Ag-ed about 3q -YeqR' Occ. Agriculture,'Ri/o. D. No. 1-96, Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Reddy 3. The Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. 4. The Village Revenue Officer, Office of the Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

5. The Panchayath Secretary, Kardanur Gram Panchayath, Kardanur village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pteased to issue a writ, or direction more pafticularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their property admeasuring 101 2 Sq. Feet having Door No. 1-95 (Old No. 6-70) situated in Sy. No. 1 0 of Kardanur Village' Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District without any notice and following of due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 not to disl r ssess the petitioners from their peaceful possession ofthe property admeasuring ()12 Sq. Feet having Door No. 1-95 (OId No. 6-70) situated in Sy. No. 10 )l .Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor. r may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 not to dispossess the ltditioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admer rr u,ring 101 2 Sq. Feet having Door No. 1-95 (OId No. 6-70) situated in Sy. No. '1 ) of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District pendir; rlisposal of the Writ petition before this Honble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.M.SWAMULU Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.S : SRI G.NARENDER RE t OY, SC FOR GP W.P.No.'|2256 OF 2021 Between: G. Sathyanarayana, S/o. Gouri Yadaiah, Aged about 42 Y,* rs, Occ. Agriculture R/o. D. No. 't-bgt2, Kardanur Village, pitaricfieru lr,tdnd;t, li rida-R"oov'tnr"iirrj District. AND 1 2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary l:venue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Ret c y ...PETITIONER The Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Distri ; 3 4, The Village Revenue Officer, ffice of the Tahsildar, Pa.i rrcheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Dstrict.

5. The Panchayath Secretary, Kardanur Gram Panchayatt , h.ardanur village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS . ...,,1 // .,/'/ : j t I I I I ! ! I i I I i l i I I I i i i Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affklavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the zt{h and 5th Respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their property admeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 having Door No. 1-99/2 situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Distr'rct without any notice and following of due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to interfere/d ispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession of the property admeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 Guntas having Door No. 'l -99/2 situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to interfere/d ispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 Guntas having Door No. 'l-99/2 situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honble court. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.M.SWAMULU Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondents No.5 : SRI G.NARENOER REDDY, SC FOR GP W.P.No.'|6673 OF 2021 Between:

1. Gouri Mallaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged 54 Years, Occ. Agriculture, Residents of Kardanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

2. Gouri Yadaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged about 60 Years, occ. Agriculture, Resklents of Kardanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

3. Bhanoor Kistaiah, S/o. MaHaiah, Aged about 54 Years, Occ. Private Service, Residents of Kardanoor Village, Patancheru lvlandal, Sanga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. 2 3 4

7. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary levenue uepartment, Secretariat, HyiJeribad. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Rer < y. The Tahsildar, patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Distri ; The Village Revenue Officer, ffice of the Tahsildar, pa i rcheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District. The Panchayath Secretarv. Kardanur Gram panchayat, (ardanur village, patancheru lvtandat, Sang:d Reddy Disarict.' The Station House Officer. BDL Bhanoor police Station, F €rtancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Dist. Gulam Mohammed Sateem S/o. Lqle Gulam Murtuza, t S 2d 71years, occ. Pensioner, R/o. Ka rda noor Vilrs., i;d;ffi i nsa Reddy District "i.ii'tiii,E r I = ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indii praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the - 1rh court may be pleased to issue a writ, or direction more particurarry one in t o nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the respondent No. 4 to 6 i r interfere with the peaceful possession and enjsyrnsnt of the petitioners tcuse site property admeasuring 0.03 1/3 Cents each in Sy. No. .t 0 of Kardanur \ illage, pat Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District on the instigation r1. 6th res without following due process of law. as illegal, arbitrary, E r c unconst itutional and consequen'y direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to ir r:rfere/dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession of the proper y ;:dmeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 Guntas of each situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur / llage, patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District. pondent ancheru lA r{o: 1 oF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the cir; in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court I direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to interfere/dispossess t I their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property adn r 1/3 Guntas of each situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur V ll Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District pending disposat ot before this Honourable court lrnstances stated e y be pleased to r petitioners from e suring Ac. 0,03 tge, Patancheru he Writ petition ,i l lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Gulam Molqmmed Saleem,. S/o._ Late .Gulam Murtuza, ASed 71 years. Occ. Pensioner, Rl/o. Kardanoor Viitage, paG;ct e, Mffi;i, b;gl'ftldoy'oili#i "* AND 1

3. Gouri Mallaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged 54 years, Occ. Agricutture, Gouri Yadaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged about 60 years, occ. Agricutture, Bhanoor Kistaiah, s/o. Maflaiah, Aged about 54 years, occ. private service, **""nts of Kardanoor Vifiage, patancheru Mandat, Sanga Reddy Al!,i::. ...PETITIONERS/R.7

3. The State of Telanoana Rep.. by. its.principal Secretary, Revenue I I LvrrY i vvvr vr! Depa rtment, Secreia riat, Hvbeiioi?. ...RESPONDE NTS/PETITIONERS

4. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Reddy. 5. The Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. 6. The Village Reygnue Offrcer, Office of the Tahsildar, patancheru Mandal, 7 The Panchayath Secretary, Kardanur Gram panchayath, Kardanur village, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District Patancheru Mandal, Sangia Reddy Districi.

8. The Station House officer,_ BDL Bhanoor porice Station, patancheru Mandar, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Dist. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders passed in r.A.No.1 of 2021 in w.p.No.16673 of 2021 , dated 27-07-2021. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.M.SWAMULU Counsel for the Respondents No.{to4: AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5 : SRI G.NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR Gp Counsel for the Respondents No.6 : Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.7 : -- The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ]I,ISARATH WRIT PETITION Nos. 1(X)91 L2256 16( 73 of2O2L COMMON ORDER: These petitions are coming for hearir 51 since 202 1. On 27.IO.2O25 when the matters were call( < , there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the matters were directed to be listed under I .r: caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matte rs were called, there is no representation. It seems that he petitioners are not interested to prosecute these cases.

2. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions a:t dismissed for non-prosecution/defau1t. No order as to co J :t;.

3. Pending miscellaneous applicaticr r;, if any, in these Writ Petitions shall also stand closed. SD'.A.} . ;. GOWRI S}TANKAR S ISTANT REG]S ,^{s //TRUE COPY// r SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to SRI G.M,SWAMULU, Advocate. [OPU\ 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court forthe Sla rr of Telangana.

3. One CC to SRI G NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR GPFS. [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR HON/E, High Court for the State : '[elangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies. BSK BS HIGH COURT SK,J DATED:1011112025 :: -l f * 71 i8 W 1 Sn oHi i A $>;,' ,:-..2 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.10091, 12256 & 16673 ot 2021 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS l , l : : I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I '| j I I t i I i I i I I i i a. )

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments