The High Court · 2025

Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K. KIRAN MAYEE Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 to 8: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.8187 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and with the consent of the learned counscl appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage. 2 . Having regard to the natu re of lis involved in the Writ Petition and the manner of disposal, this Court is of the view that notice to unofhcial respondent Nos.5 to 8 is not neccssary for adjudication of the present Writ Pctition-

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the respondents-au thorities, in particular the 4th respondent is interlering in the civil disputes in respect of petitioner's land in survey No.160lll1, 1601211, and 160/3 in all admeasuring Acres 9.17 guntas situated at Maganoor Village & Mandal, Narayanpet District, at the behest of unofficial respondent Nos.S to 8, without any authority of law, which action it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary-

4. Per contra, Iearned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4 would submit that the 5th respondent 2 :'.Q?q!i; had approachcd the respondents-authorities arrcl submitted a complaint on l)1 .O'2.2025; that the authorities after receiving the aforesaid r:omplainl made a GD entry and caus,:d preliminary cnquin- into ti'e contents of the complaint, whi;l-r rcvealcd the disputc to be ciuil in nature; and thus, the authoritres have closed the aforcsa id q,:rrlplaint as ,civil in nature, and infirrmed the same to the ,5tr, respouricnt on 13.O2.2025.

5. Leanred ( iovcrnment Pleader for Home further submils that except causing ltrcliminary enquiry into the complilint lodged by the 5th rcspondlnt, the responden ts-autl-rorities ar( noL inte rfering in the civil disputes rhal lxay exist between the petiLioner ancl responclcr-rt Nos 5 to 8.

6. Thc elforesajd submiss.ion made by the learne,l Governn-rent Pleader for Horne appearing for official respondents is taker.r on record .

7. Having resard to the submissions made as above, and since, the respondents authorities, basing on the complair-r, made by the 5th respond,:nt on 04.O2.2025, having caused prelirninary enquiry and closcd tht, aforcsaid complaint as 'civil ir. nature' on

13.O2.2025, this C-.ourt is of the view that responden ts-authorities are to be directl d no[ to irltcrfere in the civil dispu:tes cxcept in accordalrcc u.i [h Lar,,'.

8. Subject to the above observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

9. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending these writ petitions shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. P. PADMANABH DEPUTY RE EDDY STRAR Home Department 1 . The princi pal Secretary, State Secreta riat Buildin g, Hyderabad 2. The Superintendent of police, Narayanpet District 3Th e Circle lnspector of Police, M atkal, Narayanpet District 4. Th e Station House Officer, P.S Magan oor, Nara yanpet District 5. One CC to Smt. K. Kiran Mayee Advocate IoPUC 6. Two CCs to GP For Home High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana SECTION OFFICER To, MBC s HIGH COURT TVK,J DATED: 1910312025 a oR 1Hts Si'{ ( o e 4 ff, * L^ ( ORDER WP.No.8187 of 2025 DISPOSING OF WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS d (r(,r'