The High Court · 2025

4. Sri Vanakayala Sai Kumar, S/o Late Vankayala Gandhi, aged about 43 years, Occ: Housewife, H.No.5-2-1 13, Shanti Nagar, Khammam Urban, Khammam, Telangana 507001

5. Sri Vanakala Vijaya Kumar, Wo Late Vankayala Gandhi, aged about 40 years, Occ: House Wife, H.No.5-2-1'13, Shanti Nagar, Khammam Urban, Khammam, Telangana 507001 ...Appellants Legal Heirs of the Sole Appellant Appellants 2 to 5 are brought on record as LRs of deceased sole appellant viz., Sri Vankayala Gandhi, as per Court Order dated 28-11-2022, vide l.A.No.1 of 2018 made in AS.No.361 2 of 2003. AND 1 Rayapudi Arwapalli., s/o.Venkaiah, aged 72 years, H.No.3-8-324, Guttala 2 1 4 Bazar, Khammam. .(Died)Per L.R. Appellants 2to6. Rayapudi Kantha Ratnam, Wo late Rayapudi Aruapalli, aged 70 years, R/o 3-8-324, Guttala Bazar Khammam Rayapudi Rambabau, S/o late Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 47 years, R/o 3-8- 324, Gullala Bazar Khammam Tummala Penta Kumaii, D/o Late Rayapudi Aruvapalli, aged 53 years, R/o Ramalayam st. Jaggayyapet, Krishna District. R2,3 & 4- dismissed for default court order dated 1512111 R/o. Ramalayam st. Jaggayyapet' Krishna District'

5. Tummalapalli santha Kumari, D/o Late Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 45 years' 6 Ekkata pushpavaili, ;7;i;i; Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 40 vears, R/o Guttala ...Respondents of deceased R'1 as per Court Bazar, Khammam Respondents 2 to 6 are brought tl-11"9id^ ": ^LRs order dated 07-06-2010 made in ASMP 848 of 2010' l.A. NO:2 oF 2002{CMP. NO: 22133 0F2002) Petitionundersectionl51CPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit treo rn supJort ortne ptiition' ine Hign Court I:I^1" Pleased to 'Judgment dated 22-04-2002 passed in ;it O.S.No.75 of 1998 on tne tife ottlre Senioi Civil Judge, Khammam' including the "? execution thereof . operation ot oJciee- and Counsel for the Appellants: Sri D'S'N'V' Prasad Babu Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court delivered the following: 'tUOCfUel'lf *i;E!PiiEiEEEiI*l+: THE HOI{OURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT No.3612 of 2OO3 JUDGMENT: Challenging tht jr.rrlgllcnt irnd rlccrt'e dated 22.0'1.2OO2 passed in O.S.No-75 of ig!)8 bt' ihe lcarrncd Scnior Civil Judge, Khammam, thi: 1-'1351111, Alrpea.l Suit is filed

2. The brief iacts ol lhc casr' :rre ihal the rt--sponder-rt filed the suit for the recoi,cn of tili irrnolrnt of Rs. 'l ,53,826i - based on trvo promissorv notcs cxc('utr:d by thc appellant. The appellant iiled a n'rittt:r-r statrrircnt Lrcli;re the trial CourL, denying the executiorr o1' rhr-' prortissory notes. Bascd on the pleadings, Lhe trial court frarne(l lour issues. On behalf of the plaintiff, PW.I u'as cxarr,inecl, ar-rcl Ex.A I to A4 rvere marked. On behalf of Lhc dcfr:nclant, DW. I u]as cxa mincd, but no exhibits r,r.cre marked, Alrcr cxzrmining the evidcnce, the trial Court, vidc order datc-d 2'-2.t)4.2OO2, ckcrced thc sr.tit for a sum of Rs.1,53,82(;/ - rr,,ith r:osts anci future interest at 24oh per annum on Rs.90,OUO i :rnd Rs..}(i,OO0/ - lrom the datc ol the suit until tl-rc c]atc ol decrcc. Additionalll', it ordered interest at 67o pcr eulrlum from thc clatc of decrec until , I 2 SKS'J A.S. No-3612 of2OO3 realizertion. Aggrieved thcrebv, the appellant Prr-ferred thc prcscnt aPPeal sttit Ilear<1 Sri DSNV Prasacl Ballu, Ie'rrrrrccl cotttlscl 3. appcaring on behalf of the rlppellant Dcspitc sr:rr ice of notit:e' none appeared on behalf oI the respondents' Learnecl counsei for the appelllint sttbmrtli:cl ttlilI th(] '21)o2 Thc

4. suil rvas clecrced for Ri 1,53,8261- in thc -vcitr appellant paicl i,rn amourlt of Rs 1,43,31O/ on Ob 01 20O3 and is willing to pzry thr: remaining amount trnrl lrr' prll'r'ecl the Court Lo Pass aPPropriatc orders'

5. Upon consideration of the submissions itttti pelrr'tsltl of the matcrial on record, rt is noted that the t'rppt'llirnt paid 'rtl am()unt of Rs.1 .43,31O I ' onc vear alte r the tlt'r't-ee' and the suit amount is Rs. 1,53,826/ The appellant is nor'r' reacll' to pay the rernirining amoul)t Hou'cvcr, the tri;rl Court hzrd orclcrcd intcrcst aL 24oto pcr annum from thc date of thc suit till thc date of decree , anc)' 60/o pcr annum from lhc cluttc ol decree lill rczrlization. As the appcllant alrcurclv paid the majority of the amount in thc ycar 2OO3, it is dirt'r:ted tl-rat for 3 SKS,J A.S.No.3612 of 2Oo3 the rcmaining bzrlancc, the trppcllar-rt shall deposit the remaining amount at 6'/o per anllum ir-r the trial Court r'r'ithin (4) weeks from the date of receipt o[:r cop,r' of this order'

6. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is clisposed ol-' There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneotts applic:itions, if anv pending, shall stand closed SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD DE UTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII CTION OFFICER To, '1. The Senior Civil Judge, Khammam. 2. One CC to Sri D.S.N.V. Prasad Babu, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies kam/gh HIGH COURT DATED:1710612025 IPt:' S I 3i,1It- 2025 ;) Ai( ,,| G) ir\ * JUDGMENT+DECREE AS.No.3612 ot 2003 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 3385 ] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO'THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT NO: 3612 OF 2003 Between:

1. Vankayala Gandhi, S/o.Ramaiai, Canvassing Agent, H.No.2-2-271, Opp Sudershan Nursing Home, P.S.R.Road, Khammam.

2. Smt. Vanakayala saraswathi, Wo Late Vankayala Gandhi, aged about 65 years, H.No. 5-2-113, Shanti Nagar, Khammam Urban, khammam, Telangana 507001

3. Smt. Kannegondla Jaya Laxmi, Wo Ashok, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, H.No.3-6-2, Gandhi Nagar, Khammam Urban, Khammam, Telangana 507003

4. Sri Vanakayala Sai Kumhr, S/o Late Vankayala Gandhi, aged about 43 years, Occ: Housewife, H.No.5-2-1 '13, Shanti Nagar, Khammam Urban, Khammam, Telangana 507001

5. Sri Vanakala Vijaya Kumar, Wo Late Vankayala Gandhi, aged about 40 years, Occ: House Wife, H.No.5-2-1'13, Shanti Nagar, Khammam Urban, Khammam, Telangana 507001 ...Appellants Legal Heirs of the Sole Appellant Appellants 2 to 5 are brought on record as LRs of deceased sole appellant viz., Sri Vankayala Gandhi, as per Court Order dated 28-11-2022, vide l.A.No.1 of 2018 made in AS.No.3612 of 2003. AND

1. Rayapudi Anvapalli., s/o.Venkaiah, aged 72 years, H.No.3-8-324, Guttala Bazar, Khammam.

2. Rayapudi Kantha Ratnam, Wo late Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 70 years, R/o 3-8-324, Guttala Bazar Khammam

3. Rayapudi Rambabau, S/o late Rayapudi Aruvapalli, aged 47 years, R/o 3-8- 324, Guttala Bazar Khammam

4. Tummala Penta Kumari, D/o Late Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 53 years, Rl/o Ramalayam st. Jaggayyapet, Krishna District. R2,3 & 4- dismissed for default court order dated 151211'l

5. Tummalapalli Santha Kumari, D/o Late Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 45 years, R/o. Ramalayam st. Jaggayyapet, Krishna District.

6. Ekkala Pushpavalli, D/o Late Rayapudi Arwapalli, aged 40 years, R/o Guttala Bazar, Khammam ...Respondents Respondents 2 to 6 are brought on record as LRs of deceased R.1 as per Court order dated 07-06-2010 made in ASMP 848 of 2010. Appeal filed under Section 96 R/w order XLI Rule 1 of C.P C. against the Judgment and Decree dl- 224-2002 passed in O.S.No.75 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D.S.N.V. Prasad Babu, Advocate for the Appellants and none appeared for the Respondents. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of; 2. That the appellant be and hereby shall deposit the remaining amount at 6% per annum in the trail Court within(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; and

3. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.V.S. PRASAD PqPUTY REGISTRAR \i SECTION OFFICER To, 'l . The Senior Civil Judge, Khammam 2. Two CD Copies 1p HIGH COURT DATED:1710612025 DECREE AS.No.3612 ot 2003 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT