High Court · 2025

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 in receiving, registering and releasing the Mortgage Deed without possession presented by the petitioner in respect of all that the 10 Percent of the total built up area i.e., 120.82 Sq.Meters., (1300.49 Sq.Feet), in the building, Flat Nos.101 and 102 (part) in the 1st Floor, on Plot No.44A, admeasuring 300 Sq.Yards., and the land in Plot No.44B, admeasuring 300 Sq.Yards., total extent of 600 Sq.Yards., located in Sector-lll, 'C' Block, in Sy.Nos.236/'l and 237, situated in Alkapoor Township, Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Mandal (New), Rajendra Nagar Mandal (Old), Ranga Reddy District, on the basis of Status Quo order daled 2311212021 passed in I.A.No.1 OF 2021 in C.M.A.No.383 OF 2021, passed by this Honourable Court, wherein this Honourable Court passed Status Quo order in respect of restraining the respondents therein or anyone claiming through them from changing the nature of the suit property ir O S.No.541 of 2O15 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, and Status Quo order dated 2610812021 passed in LA.No. 253 OF 2021 in O.S.No. 242 OF 2021, passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, as illegal, arbitrary, non-binding on Petitioners and one without jurisdiction and to oonsequently direct the respondent No.3 to receive, register and release the Mortgirge Deed without possession presented by the petitioner in respect of all that the 10 Percent of the total built up area i.et., 120.82 Sq.Meters., (1300 49 Sq Feet) in the building, Flat Nos. l01 and 102 (part) in the 1st Floor, on Plot No.44A. adnreasuring 300 Sq.Yards., and the land in Plot No.44B, admeasuring 300 Sq.Yards., total extent of 600 Sq.Yards., located in Sector-lll, 'C' Block, in Sy.Nos.236/1 and 237, situated in Alkapoor Township, Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Mandal (New), Rajendra Nagar Mandal (Old), Ranga Reddy District, without the: reference of Status Quo order daled 2311212021 passed in LA.No.1 OF 2021 ,n C.M.A.No.383 OF 2021, passed by this Honourable Court, wherein this Honourable Court passed Status Quo order in respect of restraining the respondents therein or anyone claiming through them from changing the nature of the suit property in O.S.No.541 of 2015 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, and Status Quo order dated 2610812021 passed n LA.No. 253 OF 2021 in O.S.No. 242 OF 2021, passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L-B-Nagar, lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition unde' Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s;uoport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No:] to receive, register and release the Mortgage Deed without possession presented by the petitioner in respect of all that the 10% of the total built up area i.e, 120.82 Sq Meters., (1300.49 Sq.Feet), in the building, Flat Nos.101 and 102 tpa() in the 1st Floor, on Plot No.44A, admeasuring 300 Sq.Yards., and the land in Plot No.44B, admeasuring 300 Sq.Yards., total extent of 600 Sq.Yards., located in Sector-lll, "C" Block, in Sy.Nos.236i 1 and 237, siluated in. Alkapoor Township, Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Mandal (New), Ralendra Nagar Mandal (Old ) Ranga Reddy District, without the reference of Status euo order dated 23-12-2021 passed in l.A.No.1 OF 2021 in C.M.A.No.383 OF 2021' passed by this Honourable Court, wherein this Honourable Court passed Status Quo order in respect of restraining the respondents therein or anyone claiming through them from changing the nature of the suit property in O.S.No.541 of 2015 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, and Status Quo order dated 26-08-2021 passed in l.A.No. 253 OF 2021 in O.S.No. 242 OF 2021, passed by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025: Between: Smt. Vandana Bai Wio. Sai Kumar, Nagar, Uppuguda, Hyderabad. R/o.H.No. 18-1-293/3 & 4/A, Shivaji .,.IMPLEAD PETITIONER AND

1. M/s BANDI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, (ClN No U40108AP201'1PTC075489), having its registered office at H.No.6-3-20, Plot No.20, Hasthinapuri Colony, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad. Represented by its authorized signatory. Sri Bandi Sunil Kumar S/o Sri Bandi Veirkateswara Rao, Aged aboul 42 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.6-3-20' PlotNo.20, HasthinapuriColony,Sainikpuri, Secunderabad. ...pE,TtoNER 2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Stamps and Regiskation), Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Commiisioner and lnspector, General of Registration and Stamps, Telangana, Hyderabad.

4. The Sub-Registrar, Gandipet, Ranga Reddy District 5. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed'in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioneri proposed respondent to implead as party respondent No. 5 in the writ petition No. 8175 ot 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for Respondent: AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel forthe Proposed Respondent: SRI T. BALA MOHAN REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER it. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRJT PETITION No.8175 of 2o25 ORDER: Learne<i counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner- is the absoiute owner and possessbr of the lald admeasuring [() an extent of 30O Sq. Yards in Plot No.44A and also the land admeasuring to al exterrt of 300 Sq. Yards in Plot \o 448 located in Sector-III. "C" Block in S1'.Nos.2llb/ I ancl 237 situated at Alkapo<>r Township, Puppalaguda \riilage, Gandipet Mandal (New), Raj'endra Nagiir Mandzr (Olcl), Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner has applir:d fr:r br-rilding construction permission. In view of the above said building permission, ttre petitioner herein has ext'cutccl thc deed of mortgage in lavour of the Mctropolitan Commissioner, HMDA. As per the procedurc contr:mplated under the law, the petitioner has presented thr' mortgage deed before the Registering Authoritl, l.e rcspondent No.3 along wi.th relevant documents t(, registor the subject documents, but the Registering Ar rthorily is rcfusing to receive and process the subject d(), umcnts on the ground of Stotrzs quo ord,er I 2 -sI(../ Ir/ P 817 5 202.j dated 23.12.2021 passed in IA No.l of 2O2l in CMA No.383 of 2021 and further submits that neither the petitioners nor petitioners' vendor are parties in CMA No.383 ol 2O2l or in OS Nos.54 1 of 2015 and 242 of 2O2L on the file of V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy, L.B.Nagar. 7 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is duty bound on the part of the Registering Authority to receive, register and release the subject docr-rments and if Registering Authority is not registering the subject documents, the Registering Authority shall assign reasons for refusal

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondent No.3 has misinterpreted the order passed in IA No.l of CMA No.383 of 2021, dated

23.12.2021 ald placed entire survey numbers under prohibitory list, hence, respondent No.3 is orally refusing to receive and register the sa,le deeds presented by the petitioner. In similar matters, this Court passed orders in 3 SK, J tvP Bt75 2025 W.P.No.1942:\ of 2024 dated 23.07.2024 and W.P.No.34O1l] ,rf 2021 dated 04.12.2024 and requested to pass similar or<1er in lhe present writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registral ion not disputed the submissi<>ns made by the petitioner But stating that the Registering Authority not registerinli tl.rc clocuments in view of number of civil cases pending u'ith rc'gard to the subject property.

5. In vie'"1 o1- the submissions made by the learned counsel on cithcr side and without exltressing any opinion on rnerits of the case, this writ petition 1S I ( disposed Io lvit h a liberty to petitioner to make representation /application submitting all his grievances, within a perio<l of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of copy ol llris order and on such representation/ application, tlrc respondent authorities are directed to dispose of the same by following the guidelines issued in the circular Mt:mo No G3 19122 12024, dated 12.O8.2024 and pass appr.opriatc orders strictly in accolclance with t t \ \ 4 -s I(. ./ tr/P,_8 t 7 5 202.i Iaw and in terms of the guidelines issued in Vinjamuri Rajagopla Chary Vs. Stqte of Andhra Pradesht and in W.P.No.283OO of 2OO7 Er, Batch, dated 79.7O.2O23, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of pe titioner's representation / application.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition 1S disposed of Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, tn th wnt p etition sha-ll stand closed. No order as to costs. Sd/- P. PADMANABHA DEPUW REG EDDY TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Tetangana, HYderabad. Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 1 . The Principal Secretary Revenue (Stamps and Registration), State of 2. The Commissioner and lnspector, General of Registration and Stamps, 3. The Sub-Registrar, Gandipet, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Diskict Registrar, Ranga Reddy Diskict. 5. One CC to Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP For Stamps And Registration ,High Court for the State of 7. Two GD Copies Telangana. [OUT] To, MBC g F.t l e R., tr., \ 'lzoiolrynrr sso1ral1 I HIGH COURT ' SK,J DATED: 1910312025 1 rrE $rai o^ r 3 0{ ApB ?ir25 ('( * ( -.., t .: ,r. -.. I i 'i- -_-. --- ORDER WP.No.8175 of 2025 DISPOSING OF WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 09ortu *