G. Radha Krishna St.No.6219 v. The Chairman & Managing Director , Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited., (I.D.P.L.)
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Nov 2010
- Bench
- P SWAROOP REDDY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 8102 of 2001 Between: G. Radha Krishna St.No.6219, S/o. Subrahmanyam, Production Executive working in Commercial Department, I.D.P.L., Gurgaon, Haryana. ..... PETITIONER AND
The Chairman & Managing Director , Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited., (I.D.P.L.), Gurgaon, Haryana.
The General Manager, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited., (I.D.P.L.) Hyderabad, A.P., .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not relieving the petitioner under voluntary Retirement Scheme, as arbitrary, discriminatory, and illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to relieve the petitioner from services of Production Exective post, Presently working in Commercial department, I.D.P.L., Hyderabad forthwith under V.R.S., as was done in respect of similarly situated employee in I.D.P.L., with consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. G.V.L.N. MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI. K. SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Chairman & Managing Director, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited., (I.D.P.L.),Gurgaon, Haryana. 2 The General Manager, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited., (I.D.P.L.) Hyderabad, A.P.,
One CC to MR. G.V.L.N.MURTHY Advocate [OPUC]
Two CCs to MR. K.SRINIVASA MURTHY High Court Of A.P. Hyd. [OUT]
Two CD Copies. HIGH COURT PSR,J DATED: 25-11-2010 ORDER WP.NO: 8102 OF 2001 DISMISS HIGH COURT DATED: WP.NO:
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 25 Nov 2010. The bench was P SWAROOP REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.