✦ High Court of India · 12 Sep 2025

Md. M.A.Naseeb Khan v. N.Sridhar

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,607 words

f .Sridhar, 9/q.^l.to1 Known, Aged Not Known, Occ. Srr retary to covt. of state Telangana (FAC), Education Depai,tment, Secretariat, Hy :terab'ad. ...PilTONER/RESI ONDENT No.l in C.C., AND

1. Md. M.A.Naseeb Khan, S/o. Racieeb Khan, Agerl about 48 years, Occ. Contractor, Ri/o. H.No. 11-1-12041113, Habeeb Najar, vilaltepally, FtyOeriOia. _ RESPONDE NT/WRIT PETMONER 1. E,V-Narasimla_$eddy, S1o. Not Knorvn Aged Not t nown, Occ.Ex- fficio,. State Proiect Director, Samagra Shiksha, Hydera t id District, telangan;' State.

2. R.Rohini, W/o. Not Known, Aged Not Known, Orc llx-Officio, The District Educational officer, and Exofficio, District project Ct rcer Samagra Snititri, Hyderabad District, Telangana State.

3. Anud_eep Durisefty, S/o. Not Known, Age not Knowr The District Collector and. District $agglgte, Hyderabad Dislrid, Coltectc r rte comptex, Ufai-ki_ pool, Hyderabad-50O 004. a 9$I-.1{!fr,_9to, N9! Knorn, Age Not Known, Tr:. Executive Engineer, TGEWIDE, District Collectorate C-omplex, B-30j anrl 302, 3rd Floor, Silvar Jubile Bhavan, Lakdikapool, ttyiJeraOaa-SOO OOz "Sneha ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT Nos.2,3,4 & S in C.C., Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the : -cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL t may be pleased to dispense wit+l the presence of the R1 i.e., secretary to o )vernment of state of Telangana FAC Education department Secretariat Hyder;r rad on 01-0g-2025 in CC.NO. 684/2025 in WP.NO. 34046,12024 before this Hon,trt r High Court. lA NO: 2 OF 2O2s Between: E.V.Narasimha leddy, S/o. Not Known Aged Not Knowrr, Occ.Ex- Officio, State HroJect uirector, Samagra Shiksha, Hyderabad District, Tt:t rngana State. ...PETITIONER/RESF( NDENT No.2 in C.C., ANO

1. Md. M.A.Naseeb Khan, S/o. Racieeb Khan, Aged about rl8 years, Occ. Contractor, Fyo. H.l,lo. 11-1-12f,41'1'13, Habeeb l{agar, Mallepally, Hyderabad. RESPONDENT, PETITIONER in C.G.,

2. N.Sridhar, S/o. Not Knorm, Aged Not Known, Occ. Secretary to Govt. of state Telangana (FAC), Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. R.Rohini, W/o. Not Known, Aged Not Known, Occ. Ex4fficio, The Dis{rid Educatiohal ofticer, and Ex0ficio, Distric{ Prcject Officer Samagra Shksha' Hyderabad Distrirl, Tdargana State.

4. Anudeep Durisetty, S/o. Not Known, Age no! Known' The District Collector and DistriA Magiitrate, Hyderabad C[sirici, Collectorate complex, Lakdi-ka- pool, Hyderabad -500 OO4.

5. Shafi Miya, S/o. Not Known, Age Not tlngyn, fI,"- Executive Engineer' TGEWDE,'District Colledorate Comp{ex, 8-301 and 302, 3rd Floor, Sneha Silvar Jubile Bhavan, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad-SoO 004- ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONOENT Nos-1,3,4 & 5 in C.C.' Petition under Sec{ion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the preseflce of the R2 i e , Ex Officio State Proiect Director Samagra Shiksha Hyderabad District, Telangana State on O1lOBl2O25 in CC NO 6A412025 in WP NO 3404612024 before this Hon'ble High Court. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: R.Rohini, W/o. Not Known, Aged Not Known, Occ. Ex0fficio' The- Dstrict gJucatiohat officer, and ExOfrcio, District Project Officer Samagra Shiksha, Hyderabad District, Telangana State. ...PEflflONER/RESPONDENT No.3 in C.C.' AND

1. Md. M.A.Naseeb Khan, S/o. Racierf Ktnn, Aged about 48 years, .Occ' Contractor, R/o. H.No. 11-1-1m41il3, Habeeb Nagar, ildlepally, Hyderabad' RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER in C-C.,

2. N.Sridhar, S/o. Not Known, Aged Not Known, Occ. Secretary to Govt' of state Tdangana (FAC), Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. E.V.Nacasimha Reddy, S/o. l"lot Known Aged fl'ot Known, Occ'Ex- fficitc' State Project Directcir, Samagra Shiksha, Hyderabad District, Tdangana State.

4. Anudeep Durisetty, S/o. Not Known, Age not Kno'r and District Magistrate, Hyderabad Distrid, Collect( pool, Hyderabad-50O 004. r, The District Collector 'ate complex, Lakdi-ka-

5. Shafi Miya, S/o. Not Known, Age ttot Known, t TGEWIDE, District Collectorate Complex, 8-301 an, Silvar Jubile Bhavan, Lakdikapool, Hyilerabad-S00 0C re Executive Engineer, 302, 3rd Floor, Sneha 1. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDEI{ l' Nos.1,2,4 & 5 in C.C., Petition under Section 151 CPC pralng that in the the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc dispense wrth the presence of the R3 i e , Ex Officio, Di; and Ex Officio., District Froject Director Samagra Shiks Telangana State on 0110812025 in CC NO 68412025 i before this Honble High Court. :ircumstances stated in rrt may be pleased to rict Educational Officer 1a Hyderabad District, wP NO 3404612024 lA NO: 4 OF 202s Between: 1 Anudeep Durisefty, S/o. Not Known, Age not Knov/, , The District Collector and_ District Magistrate, Hyderabad District, Collect,) ate complex, Lakdi-ka- pool, Hyderabad-500 004. ...PETITIONER/RESI ONDENT No.4 in C.C., AND 'l . Md. M.A.Naseeb Khan, S,/o. Racieeb Khan, Agert Contractor, R/o. H.No. 11-1-12041113, Habeeb Mgar about z1{} years, Occ. v{allepally, Hyderabad. RESPONDEIT / PET]TIONER in C.C,,

2. N.Sridhar, S/o. Not Known, Aged Not Knowq Occ. Se Telarqgana (FAC), Education Department, Secretariat, 3. E.V.Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Not Known Agred Not t !ta!e Project Director, Samagra Shiksha, Hyderat State.

4. R.Rohini, W/o. Not Known, Aged Not Known, Occ Educational officer, and Ex0flicio, Distict Proiect C,l Hyderabad District, Telangana State. S 9!gn Miya, S/o. Not Known, Age Not Known, Tl^ T9EWIDE, District Collectorate Complex, B-301 an,l Silvar Jubile Bhavan, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad-SoO Ot, rretary to Govt. of state '{yderabad. nown, Occ.Ex- Officio, rd Districl, Telangana ilxOffi cio, The District icer Samagra Shiksha, : Executive Engineer, 302, 3rd Floor, Sneha ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONOEII '' Nos.1,2,3& 5 in C.C., Petit'on under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the presenoe of the R3 i e , The District coHector and District Magistrate Hyderabad District Collectorate complex lakdikapool, Hyderabad 5OOOO4 on O1lOBt2O25 in CC NO 68412025 in WP NO 3404612024 Sefore this Honble High Court . Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. P. U .BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent I TO 4: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent 5:SRl A.YADAVA REODY(STANDING COUNSEL FORTGEWTDC) The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS., JUSTICE SUREPALLI I ANDA CONTEMPT CASE No.684 OF 2Or,- , ORDER: Heard Sri P.U.Bhaskara Rao, learn appearing on behalf of the petation( ed counsel t t learned covernment Pteader for School Educaticl appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 and iri A.Yadav Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGEWIDC appearing on behalf of the respondent Nc' ti.

2. Complaining violation of the orders of th : Court dated

02.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.34O46 of 2O24, the present Contempt Case is filed. 3 relevan of the o r I this Court dated O2.O1.2O25 sed in W.P.No.34O4l of 2O24 is extracted hereunder: "The Writ Petition is disposed of dir,-' respondents to conclude the steps already ini settlement of final bills of the petitioner for exe the work namely "Repairs and Renovation to Nagar, Gowliguda, Banjara Hills, Shaikp Hyderabad, M.Corporation (\f), Hyderabac MOMB-MBMB Scheme- U Dise Code 362;:r covered by agreement No.48 of 2022-23 period of eight (08) weeks from the date of r copy of the order as per the petitioner :ting the iafed for r:ution of ]HS NBT irt (M), . under 790229, ,vithln a ::ceipt of ,; lawful 2 SN,J C.C.No.684 2025 entitlement. However, there shall be no order as. to costs." ' -- -:

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.S submits that the order Of this Court dated 02.01.2025 passed in W.p.No.34046 of 2O24 had been complied with.

5. Learned Government pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 brings on record the proceedings vide R.C.No.634/SS/CW/25-26 dated 27.08.2025 of the State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha, Telangana, Fiyderabad and submits that the directions issued vide orders dated O2.0L.2O25 passed in W.p.No.34046 of 2OZ4 had been duty complied with. 6 d !on d N a n n b os.1 n I h s No.634 cw 5- d \ 3 r P N SN,J C.C.No.684 2O2S D I tr, Samagra o comoliance - lJ2.01.2025 t e ,rln tn - roines that a I ..i urt da d '_.2(J24 aod Ho e f, 7 2 o P I c n o 5 n lt e o Miscellaneous applications, if any, pendin: shall stand closed. To //TRUE COPY// sd/- K.Ai/tMAJI )EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFTCER J ffi,qH,Ei+*l0jffi#m-?ffi'th'fl I [ "' *"'o"' I HIGH COURT DATED:12l0glz01s ORDER CC.No.684 of 2025 t ,".''i$ /'Y 1 * lE S 14 -/(' I t-8 lrllb- : (,' ..\ ( I';l t ) .Sr TC CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CAS} E ,, l^L \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments