B. Janaiah v. T. Singaiah
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K C BHANU
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order dated 24-06-2010 made in I.A.No.1005/2010 in O.S.No.3259/2007 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. Between: 1. B. Janaiah, S/o Late B. Sayanna, 2. B. Pochaiah, S/o Late B. Sayanna, 3. B. Shanker, S/o Late B. Sayanna, R/o H.No.3-35, Mallapuram Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. AND ...Petitioners
/ Defendants T. Singaiah, S/o T. Narsimhulu, R/o. 13-18, Suryanagar, Mallapur Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....Respondent
/ Plaintiff Counsel for the Petitioners :
Sri Gaddam Srinivas Counsel for the Respondent : Sri CH. Shashi Bhushan The Court made the following
ORDER:
SD/- K. GANGADHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To 1. The I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District.
One CC to Sri Gaddam Srinivas, Advocate (OPUC)
One CC to Sri Ch. Shashi Bhushan, Advocate (OPUC) SECTION OFFICER
Two CD Copies. HIGH COURT KCB,J DATE: 17-03-2011 ORDER CRP.NO. 2993 OF 2010 ALLOWING THE CRP WITHOUT COSTS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.