The High Court · 2025

6. Kothari, s/o. S.Kotari, age 59 years, Company: K.S.Products, 7. E.Siva Shankar Reddy, s/o. E.S.Prasada Reddy, age 38 years, Company Sri r 8. PLV Mohan Kumar, s/o. P.Subramanyam, age 49 years, Company Multi Tech Sarada Engineering, Engineering Works,

9. L.Srinivas Reddy, s/o. L.Chandra Reddy, age 39 years, Company New Siva Sai lndustries,

10.Peddi Reddy, s/o. Krishna Reddy, age 48 years, Company 3P Enterprises, 11. K.C. Chocko, s/o. Mathai, age 50 years, Company Thamsan lift, 'l2.Gadadhar Shooh, s/o. Ramachandra Shooh, age 41 years, Company t G.K.Powder coting and painting works,

13. Raghava Raju, s/o. K.Krishnam Raju, age 43 years, Company Shanti lndustries, (all are C/o. Plot No. A-2, Co-Op., lndustrial Estate, Balanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State) AND 1 2 State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad. The Station House Officer, Balanagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS IlS"?53;Tl*ctor or Police, Balanagar Porice station, ( yberabad, 3 4 i;d"'[t:.-Tif$fl rf BF!flii_tiEts,,(,t'S+f i={,ith?ii',H.,,,i8.., Ni,i--2,'b""-""lpli)iil'., i,rEstate (c r.E), H:|,T"?:f i1'#33:51'?:i:,'pl"i ...RESPONDENTS petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndii praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the ligh court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, mo e particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action r; the 2nd and 3rd respondents in interfering with the day to day business activil es of the petitioners at premises bearing prot No.A-2, cooperative rndustriar Estat, , Baranagar, Ranga Reddy District' at the behest of the 4th respondent for br-'rg iilegar, arbitrary, violative of the provisions of the criminar procedure and Inco nstitutionar and consequen'y direct the respondents not to interfere with the ray to day business activities of the peti oners at the premises bearing No. A-2, O ropsp61lr. lndustrial Estate, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District. I.A. NO:1 OF 2017 MP.NO:1 7726 0F 20171 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the cirr;r mstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the writ petition, the High couil may be preased to direct the respondent porice not to interfere with the industri: activity of the writ petitioners at premises bearing prot No. A-2, booperative rndustriar Estate, Balanagar' Ranga Reddy Diskict, at the behest of the 4th rr spondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition. a Counset for the petition..", :l!:!ry]VASA RAO BODDULUt I(NONE counser ror the Responr"r,tLt":ro,:t?L*, *. *r,*AN,r REDD' f;"'t".",j j";:1" ff: ?:,l$l,l#.afr ; * G P FoR HoM E THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.1430I oF 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: "...fo pass a writ, order or a direction more pafiiculaly one in the nature of wit of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and '3i iespondents in intetfenng with the day to day, bus'ness activitie's of the petitioners it premises beaing- plot No'A2' D istrict CJ oiirative I ndu stial Estate, Batan agar, Ranga .Reddy at tite behest of the 4th respondent for being illegal' arbitrary' iiotriir" of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure and unconstitutionat and consequently direct the respondents not to iit"i"r" with the day to day business activities of the petitioners ,ii-tni pr".it"" oeinng No.A2, Cooperative lndustrial Estate' Balana'gar, Ranga Reddy District and to pass''. ""

2. None appeared for the petitioners'

3. Heard Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos l to 3'

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the allegation of interference by the respondents/police in the business of the petitioner is wholly baseless' He contends that at no point did the \ respondents/policeinterferewiththepetitioner'sbusinessinany manner. He further submits that, at the relevant time' Crime No' 10 of 2017 wasregistered against the petitioner, and during the course of i investigation, the presence of the petitioners was secured' However' upon completion of investigation, the said crime was closed with an X 2 endorsement of "false." Therefore, there was never any )ccasion for the respondents/police to interfere with the petitioner's busir :ss activities.

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No 4 submits that respondent No. 4 has no connection whatsoever witlr the allegations made by the petitioner, and therefore, the writ petiticr is liable to be dismissed.

6. I have carefully perused the materials on record.

7. From the submissions of the respondents/policer authorities, it is evident that any interaction with the petitioners was on y in the context of crime proceedings, and beyond that, the restr ondents never interfered with the petitioner's business. The assertion r f interference in business, even if assumed, would at best fall within the realm of a civil dispute. Nevertheless, in order to safeguard the petitic ter's rights and avoid any apprehension, it is directed that the res pondents/police authorities shall not interfere with the petitioner's blr: iness activities, except strictly in accordance with law.

8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is dis >osed of. There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// :,#.. r,roro r*r, A$ ;rqTANT BEGISTRAR secrbi oFFlcER To, o -TJ 1 . The Principal secretary, Home Department, Secretaria , Secretariat buildings, State of Telangana, HYderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Balanagar Police Station, ' yberabad, Hyderabad' 3. The Sub-lnspector of Police, Balanagar Police Statiorr, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.

4. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Bodduluri Advocate [Of) JC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home , High Court for the State o1 Telangana' at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies - ------1n..--*_-?- -l.*l J HIGH COURT DATED:0210912025 ORDER WP.No.14309 of 2017 () () ( * lFt SI4 I i .ril 2026 .',) SF .-\) HTC * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTOI I l -., WITHOUT COSTS 9\ 't