High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 2 to 7 to provide electricity connection Supply to 2Nos 45KW Non Domestic loads, 1No three phase 1OKW and 2Nos three phase of each 5KW Non Domestic loads, thus making a total load of 110KW Connection to the Residential Building, in Plot No.95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 and '101, in Survey No 5B/1/F, admeasuring 2180 Sq Yards situated at I RKR Enclave. Karmanghat Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North 40'Wide Road, South. 60,Wide Road, East. -10,Wide Road, West. Neighbours Land Without rnsisting upon occupancy certificate from the Bth respondent by holding that the refusal to provide electricity connection to the above referred premises is illegal and arbitrary lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frred in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to drrect the respondents 2 ro 7 to provide electricity connection suppry to 2Nos 45KW Non Domestic roads, 'l No three phase 'r,KW and 2Nos three phase af each sKW Non Domestic roads, thus making a totar load of .r.rOKW connection to the Residentiat Buitding, in plot No 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 and 101, in Survey No.58/1/F' admeasurrng 21g0 sq yards situated at RKR Encrave, Karmanghaf, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, TS., bounded by North.40,Wide Roact; South. 60' Wide -Road; East. 40, Wide Road; West. Neighbours Land. Without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the gth respondent pending disposar 9f main writ petition and may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. THAKUR ROOPA STNGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2to7:SRl N. SREEDHAR REDDy, counset ror the Respondent No.8: sRr r. r*if,[iS^'Si33$ ro* nrr. The Court made the following: ORDER 1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.8O53 of 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this'writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The writ petition is hled with the following prayer: "To issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in t1le nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 2 to 7 to provide electricity connection Supply to 2Nos 45KW Non Domestic loads, 1No three phase 10KW and 2Nos thrce phase of each SKW Non Domestic loads thus making a total load of l1OKW Connection to the Residential Building in Plot No.95, 96,97, 98,99, 100 and 101 in Survey No 58/1/F admeasuring 2180 Sq Yards situated at RKR Enclave Karmanghat, Sa-roornagar,' Ranga Reddy District, bounded by North: 40 Wide Road, South: 6O Wide Road, East: 40 Wide Road, West: Neighbours Land wtthout insisting upon occupancy certiircate from the 8 respondent by holding that the refusal to profide electricity connection to the above referred premises is illegal and arbitrar5/.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Energr for respondent No.1, Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, Iearned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri P.Srinivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for I I Respondent No.8 and perused the record. 2 I

4. Today, vvhen the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squar-e1y covered by the order datecl 26.7.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26085 of 20 18. The s'ame is not seriously disputed bv the learned counsel appearing for the rerspondents

5. In vies, of the above, for the reasons alike in the said order, this writ petition is clisposed of directing the respondents to release power suppll, to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of terms arrd conditions and on furnishing an undert:rking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Munkipal Corporation rvithin a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certihcate is produced rvithin such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordalce with lzru,. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this wlit petition stand closed l To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.L. LAKSHMI BABU AffI1TANT REGISTRAR I tl};r.- oFFrc;R '1 The Principal Secretary power and Energy Department Secretariat, T.S.Hyderabao 500022. 2. The chairman and Managing Director Southern power Distribution comoanv gf_leranoana.state Ltd., o-r-h-avin g its corporar" onicJ rt b j -sbl"trriini""'"" "' uompound. Hyderabad 500063. 3 The Chief Gerieral Manager commercial, Mint Compound TG Sp DC L, 4 The Superintendino Enoineeri Operation/, Saroornagar Circle TGSpDCL, 5. The Divisionat Engrneer/Operation/, Champapaet Division TGSpDCL, 6 T[e Assistant Divisionar Engineer/ operation/, Vanastharipuram sub - Division TGSPDC L, Saroornagar Saroornagar Saroornagar Hyderabad TGSPDCL, Saroornagar Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad 7 The Assistant Engineer/, OP / Saroornagar / AE OP Bairamlguda, 8. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by the Commissioner, I Qne 99 to Sry! THAKUR RooPA SINGH, Advocate [oPUC] 10.Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 1l Qne CC to SRl. N. SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FoR TGSPDCL [OPUC] 12.One CQ to SRl. P. SRINIVAS RAO, SC FOR GHMCIOPUCI 13.Two CD Copies HyderaPad [OUT] \ (Annex a copy of the order dt. 26.7 .2018 in W.P. No. 26085 of 2018) BM BS@i -j 7 ,' CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:18103t2025 ORDER WP.No.8053 of 2025 D' J ,re Sl'-rrq 1 ) ? 5 illAn ?ffi () f: * t cF.sF rac -^--.=a-- I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26O85 of 2O18 ORDER: Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal CorporaLion, appearing for 4s respondent.

2. It is stated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri R.Vinod Reddy, Standing counsel appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3 that the issue in this Writ Petition is covered by the order of this Court dt.23.O3.2OIB in W.P.No.9789 of 2018.

3. Therefore for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the power supply to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of the terms and conditions and on fumishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation 2 within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certihcate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs -

4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall starld dismissed. 26Lh Jluly, 2018. grQ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J