Hyderabad High Court · 2025

Petition un:err Section 528 of BNSS praying th,at ir tht, circumstances stateci in the l,/le,nrcr;lncium of Grouncis of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to sta / tll further proceedings, including the perr;ona I appearance of the Petitioner Nos l to 3 /Accused Nos. 1 to 3, in SC SPL f, o 36 of 2023, pertaining to the irlleged offence under Sections 447, 4:27, It94(l), a35, 506 r/w 34 IPC and S;e:ti:n 3(l XgXrXs) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocrties) Act, 1989, on the fil,,:,:' lll Additional District Judge-Cum-sessions Judge for Trail Cases Under of liOr; and STs(POA) Act, Sangareddy District, at Sangareddy. Furthermore, ii is; -,3;uss{gci that the Court. l.A. NO: 2 OF 202s BETWEEN: Smt. Ras;tlraprLrram Kamalamma @ Yerukala Kamalamma @Flastapuram Kamala,',nrlo Late. Kondaiah, Age. 57Yrs, Caste. ST-yerukal.;.Oci. Housewife_lr/: Kukunoorpally lVandl!), Siddipet Distrjct Cur ently R/o. H No 9-\4--16^NT.rl NJagar, Shlvarampally, RajendaiNagar, Rangarr.,ddy District, T S -500 05:? ...Petitioner/Res pondent No.2/Defacto Complainant in lA.No:;,.2 & 3 of 2025 ANO 1 2 a 4 Sri_ P_olk;rn palli Narender, S/o. Yadagiri, Age. 46 yrs. (last:;. Vishwakarma (BC B) t:!s lusiness, R/o. H No. '1-34, Kukunoorpaily Viita3e and Mandat, Siddipet [)ist i,:t Curenfly (,o, H.No 11-2-2SOt3i1St1t'", Upperbasthi, Srinivas !\ag ir , Secunderabad-b00061 . ...Respondent No.1/Petitioner No.1 /Accused No.1 in lA..No::;.2 & 3 of 2025 Sri Polk:rn p:rl i Jithender, S/c. Yadagiri, Age. 36 yrs. Castr,:. r,/ishr,vakarrna (QC-B) t)rc ilusiness, R/o H.No_ 1-34, Kukunoorpally Villa:le and Mandai, Siddipet Dislri,;1 Currenily R/o. H.No. 11-3-377t41N913 Srini\:as Nagar, Neai Skandag ri Te,rnple, Padma Rao Nagar, Secunderabad-5C006.. " ...Respondent ltlo.2 /Petitioner No.2 /Accused No.2 in lA.Nor:,.2 & 3 of 2025 Gouti Sanln:s h Xumar @ Sampath, S/o. Narayana . A.ge. 27 yrs. Caste. Bestha (i3(,-lr . Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 343.- Kikun,ioip;iliy Viiiage arrd Mandal, liidciipet District, Telangana-sO2 30.1. ...Respondent No.3/Petitioner No.3 /Accused No.3 in lA.Nor;.2 & 3 ot 2025 ln9 Stgte, c f, 1'r:la,nga na,. Represented by public prosecutc,r, Hi,gh Court of Judrcatur,l lt - yderabad. . .. Res pondent No.4/Respondent No.1 in lA.Nos.2 {ji 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 52E tiw 359(6) of Bi'iSS circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of High Court may be pleased to compound, the offences und 29i(b), 435, scio riw 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(g)(r)(s) of the ntroiiiiesl Act, 1989., pending before the lll Additional Sessions Judge for Trail Cases Under of SCs and STs(P -sangareddy, for the offences and quash District, AT- compounding the offence. praying that in the Criminal Petition, the er Sections 447 , 427, SC/ST (Prevention of District Judge-Cum- OA) Act, SangareddY the proceedings bY t.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 PetitionunderSection52Srlw35g(1)prayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may Oe pfeaseO to record the compromise betwe-e{l the petitioners No 1 to- 3 and befacto complainant/respondent l''l o 2 in SC SPL No' 36 of 2023' pertaining to tnL rlr"g"O offence under Sections.447,427,294(b), 435' 506 r/w^34 tl! a1a Sectioni(r )(g)(O(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act' 1989' on th-e^file of llt Addiiio;;l tiistrict Judge-Cum-Sessions Judge for Trail Cases Under of SCs ,nJ sf.(pon) Act, San6areddy District, at Sangareddy' and quash the proceedings. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorancium of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Narendar Karnala,AdvocateforthePetitionersandtheSriJithnederRaoVeeramalla Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No'1 and sri KKarunakar, Advocate for the Respondent No 2' The Court made the following: COfviMON ORDER ,/ - THE ]{OI..IOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos. 2 AND 30F 202s ln/And CRIMINA L PETIT ION No. 383 20F 2A25 COMMON ORDEIT This Crintirzrl Petition is filed under Section 52t\ 'cI Bharatiya seeking Nagarik Surakl;ir a Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSll i,.ozii) [)roceedings against the petitioners in S C S'PL No 36 quashment of ttr€' of 2023, on tl^'e 'ile of the learned lll Additional District 'ludge-cum- Sessions Jucge f'r'Trial of Cases Under SCs/STs (POA) Act' 1989' SangareddY The petitrorr:rs are arrayed as accused Nos l to I' in the Special 2 sessions case, rerclistered for the offences punishaole undr:r Sections 447, 427,292r(tr)'135, 506 read with Section 34 of the lndian [:)enal Code' 1860 and liecl c'rt 3(1Xg)(r)(s) of the Schedulecl Castes and the Scheduled T'ib,es; (rrevention Of Atrocities) Act' 1989

3. Heard I\lr K zrrnala Narendar, learned counsel for the petitioners' Mr.Jithender l1;c, Veeramalla, learned Additional Plrblic Prosecutor' representing lhe lespondent No 1-State and Mr K Kar:nal'lar' learned counsel for the rt:;condent No 2/de-facto complainanl

4. Pendirrg this petition, the parties have entered into the compromlse and, accordinqlrr respondent No 2lde-facfo complainant fik'rd l A Nos 2 and 3 of 202{r rvith the prayer to permit them to enter nto comPromisl 2 \l NrR./ I. 1 Xo.t ) ttr,:/ ) ol .2t i ln i ,tt"/ (.ri. l).\,t. ) 8 ) 2 ol 202 i and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in S.C Spl. No 36 of 2023

5. This Court vide ordet dated '18.03.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 22.03.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record

7. The accusations againsl the petitionersi accused Nos.1 to 3 in the Police Report. are that, on 27.12.2022 and on 10.02.2023 at Kukunoorpally, the petitioners/accused Nos l to 3 were criminally trespassed onto the ancestral land of the respondent No.2lde-facto complainant, removed boundary stones, damaged fencing and set fire to a tent erected by the respondent No.2/c/e-fac1o complainant and abused her on the name of caste. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement 3 t 1 \/lt./ -\, , ,))'.i ) ai :0.1 nf d d I t l. j,,.13)) o[202i between the Pattiert; Puniab and anottler in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v' Sfate of and Anil Mishra v' State of Lt'P2; State of Laxmi NaraYan and others3' this Sout is of the MadhYa Pradesll \/' considered vi,:w t|.ert quashment of the impugned pror:eeclingr'; in view of the settlement f r)i trxercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr '? C'1528 of BNSS, 2023. wo'' ll be in the interest of justice'

8. According '1 I A Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed Cc'nsequently' all theproceedirrr;sinSC Spl No 36of 2023'pend'ngontlefileof the rearned ,r /\ciditional District Judge-cum-sessions Jucrge for Trial of Cases Undr:r ii'ls/STs (POA) Act' 1989' Sangaredrly are hereby quashed agzrir st 1l^re petitioners/accused Nos l to 3'

9. In the above terms' the Criminal Petition is disposed of PendinJl 11 s'cellaneous applications' if any' shall stand closed' +eoE- (to) S cc 70.) Lgqq lNsc t8q 3lon (r) s cc 6C8 To, sni. l,loHD.lSn'lAlL oEi-tiri REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY" :n, SEOTION OFFICER

1. The Addlio 2. The Stati:tr 3. Two C(ls tc Hvderab;rcl Ohe Cl ic One C'l lc' 6 Two CD C otl'es 4 E ftjiH,"ft #;'sjf,[?:Inlf"{iii,i{".g;i's:rff i ii'uk*g [l' litul's.:"l3l"ut3f ' " l :'?r'J::"" NVB/PST, 4,p,L'/ !,4 t::..^vt 1 HIGH COIJFTT DATED:01 104t2025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 anct 3 of 2025 ln/and GRLP.No.3832 of Z02S 1 l-i l- Ro a! () (( a 2 7 Jtl; 2115 * t"-.. :./ DISPOSING CIF THE CRLP AND ALLoWtNc., THE lA.Nos.2 &.:3 OF 2025 b o MEMORANDT]M OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (Under Section 528 rtw 359(6) of BNSS ':-f!'l:320(6) IN THE HIGII COURT Oi'TUNTCN.TI]RE AT HTDERABAD i FOR THE STATE OF TELAI\GANA of Cr'P'C') lA.No. Crl,P.No. of 2025 of 2025 BETWEEN:

1. Sri.Polkampalli Narender S/o' Yadagiri, Age: 46 Yrs' Caste: Vishwalarrna (BC-B), Occ: Business, R/o' H'No' 1-34' Kukunoorpally Village and Mandal, Siddipet District' Currently iVo. H.No- 11-2-25 ol3ll5llll, Upperbasthi, Srinivas Nagar, Secunderabad-500061 ...Petitioner No'1 /Accusbd No'1

2. Sri. Polkampalli Jithender S/o' Yadagiri, Age: 36 Yrs' Caste: Vishwafarma (BC-B), Occ: Business, R/o H'No' 1-34' Kukunoorpally Village and Mandal, Siddipet District' Currently iVo. H.No. 1 I -3 -37 7 I 4 / N 9/3, Srinivas Nagar, N"u. Standugiri Temple, Padma Rao Nagar, Secunderabad-500061' ...Petitioner No'2 /Accused No'2

3. Gouti Santhosh Kumar @ Sampath S/o' Narayana ' Age:-27 Yrs' Caste: Bestha (BC-A), Occ: Business, R'/o H'No' 3-43' Kukunoorpally Village and Mandal, Siddipet District' Telangana-5.2 301' ...Petitioner No'3 /Accused No'3 AN D The State ofTelangana Represented bY Public Prosecutor, High Court olJudicahrre at Hyderabad' ...Respondent No. I Smt. Rasthapuram Kamalamm a @YerukalaKamalarnma @ , Rastapuram Kamala Wo. Late' Kondaiah, Age: 57Yrs' Caste: ST-Yerukala, Occ: Housewife, N/o Kukunoorpally (V&M)' Siddipet District, Currently R/o H'No' 6-14- 76 NTRNagar' Shivarampally, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District' T'S' - 500 052' 1 2 ...Respondent No. 2/Defacto Complainant F G..r"&kv ( R,S +.-o:& , J 4 * v , r1}} -1 \r seeking JOIN T l\4 (-^r herertn fircri t,re alro.,.e eussh petition I j; submitted rhaf rhe peririoner 1) to q1r21,l I hc proceedings in SC.SpL No. 36 of cr:t: orrenc< ru,rrer se*ion s: 447, 427, 2s4('),.,, .;^ l^:"]1,: 3(l)(6)1rr.i;, of the sc/sT (prevention Hon,bre rrr.{dditionar Distri* rudse cum :"":::'] lr"t, ^lsls, of scs arrtl l;'rs(poA) Act, sangareddy D,.r.,t"tttont 2) r, i, , ,, , ,in"a ll],u;" ,.]","" ::;":,.T::::" to 3 hgle;, anc, rhe 2nd resn^-r^ -- nothavir_:garrl.objecondentsetrledtheirdis "r,' ro rhe arresed -, -'uo ,'/\^/ j4 Ipc and section on the fire or Jtrd'le 1br trail cases Under * ,, , . , n".* '"""r" -. v-t t'tLters and wcll-wist ers, the petitioner No. I tes '4s su':h the 2nd respondent in SC.SpL No. 36 of 20T, 447, 427, 2sq(b), .os,506 ilw (preventiorr of Atrocities) Act, tion to quash ,h. p.o"""dip pertaininlJ ro rrr,: aileged offence ,n.i". s".rionlgs 34 rpc a.d rjection :(rXeX4G) or th" sc/s;: 19g9, ont,e flie rf Ho. n'ble III Additional Distric trai.l caser I-., Jer of Sco -- -r :_ '-' utstrtct Judge cun r gsssi6n. sTs@oA) Act' Sangare ddv District, AT. ::;ffi :":. ;::: : ;,#,,:;:' Judge for Sangareddy, lrerrrring "rr,,::-":: . ;:, H: :;::;:j:r Hence this Joirt \1cnro. Place: Hyderat,ar J -llated: .03.2ttli I "D) (- { I (a * f-r (- ' i('56-Z- ") ,g- Counse for the Petitioners (Po palli Narendar) Petitioner No. 1/Accused No. I (PolkamPalli Jithendar) Petitioner No. 2/Accused No- 2 G (Gouti Sarithosh Kumar Sampath) Petitioner No. 3/Accused No' 3 & <., q cL,- ^) R (Smt. Smt. RasthaPuram Kamalamma @ Yerukala Kamalanma @ RastaPuram Kamala) 2ND Respondent/De-facto Complainant Co r eResponilen o.2 * w I JOINT MEMO 1 We submit thr- basing on repoft of respondent No ll, Lr SC SPL N6. 36 of 2023,pefiaininp t() .r3 allcged offenceunder Sections: 44-,'.427.2'|4(b),435,506 r/w 34IPC and ilect on 3(1)(g)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention o1'l\trocities) Act, 1989, on the file o I li rn'b1e III Additional District Judge (lr-un Sesr,ions Judge tor trail Cases Ur.rdr'r ,rl SCs and STs(POA) Act, Sangaretldv District, AT: Sangareddy, ugui.rt the petitioners/accusecl No. 1 to 3. The petitioners No. I to 3 \ herein filed the rrbovo the criminal petition. At the intervention of the elders and ? well-wishers, the Respondent No.2/Defbcto Conrplainiir Lt and .the Petitioners/Acclscc ]lo. 1 to 3 have compromised the disputi:s ar nicably out of court therefore FLesl;cr.dent No 2 deposed an affrdavit to that cflbc t withdrawing the Complaint. Iloth the petitioners and the respondent hiive rro grievances against each other'; ilrr:y pray this Hon'ble Court to qua;h tlie pr-oceedings by recording this join t rr,'rno. It is therelble pra;.ed that this Hon'ble Courl may b,: plr:aserl to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in SC.SPL No. 36 of i1023, pertaining to the alleged offencc rrrler Sections:447,421,294(b),43:i.5C)6 r'i,,,r 34 IPC and Section 3(1Xg)0'Xst olthe SC/ST @revention of Atrocitics) Ac-t 1989, on the file of Hon'ble ItI I'Cditional District "rudge Cum Session; Jrx.lg,- lbr trail Cases ( ac".dv'.p,, /'{ t_./ n ) R c IJ - f SCs and STs(POA) Act' Sangareddy District' AT' Sangareddy' and to 'ble Court maY deem fit and ProPer rn Under o pass such other order or orders as this Hon the circumstances of the case' Place: HYderabad' Dateds' -03.2025 Co I for the Petitroners i ! L 1 Co for the ResPond No.2 ( PolkamPalli Petitioner No'1/Ac Narendar) cused No.1 a ( Jithendar) Petitioner No' 2/Accused No' 2 @olkamP G @samPath) (Gouti Santhosh Petitioner No. 3/Accus ed No.3 n'S'-z- d Kurnuluro.u'@ Yerukala Kam alamma @ RastaPuram Kamala) Complainant ' 2\D Respondenl/De-facto (Smt' Smt' RasthaPur4m T { + I Sb &