Constitution Bench of Honourable Supremg court of lndia in case of Anita Kushwaha v. Pushap Sudan on

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the acts of Respondent No.1 in filing her counter Affidavit dated 121312025 in CC No. 1 '19 of 2025 with deliberate fqlse statements at Para No. 6 to 9, which constitute the offence under Section 229 (1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, as being violative of law laid down by i) ii) iii) iv) Honourable Constitution Bench of Honourable Supremg court of lndia in case of Anita Kushwaha vs Pushap Sudan on 19 Ju|y,2016, Honourable High Court of A.P in case of Lakshmi Sirlga Reddy And Anr. vs Secretqry, A P. Public Service, on 21 September,2001. Order dated 22-1-2025 in Writ Petition in W.P.No. 1650 6f 2025, Hpnourable Supreme court of lndia in case of A.Shanmugam vs Ariya K.R.K.M.N.P.Sangam on 27 April, 2012, ;;*=':= :e; v) vi) Honourahle Supreme court of lndia in case of lilllthJ Karuppan vs Parithi llarrvazhuthi and Anr on 15 April, 201'1 , Honoura ble Supreme cQurt of lndia in case of Cl'rief lnformation Comrnr. anri Anr vs State Of Manipur and Anr on 12 [)er;ember and consequertl y refer a complaint against the 1st Respordent-Dr. P. Vijaya Lakshmi, berfore tlre jurisdictional Magistrate competent to takr) cognizance of the offence uroe'r Section 229 (1) of Bharatiya" Nyaya Sqnhita 1.023 in Nampally Crinin;: Courts, Hydqrabad thorugh Registrar, .ludit:ial, Hoqourable fligh court r:f l- Sl as was done Qy thig HAnourable court itl c ase of Lakshmi Singa Redcly zrrt,l Anr. vs Secretary, A.P. Public Service )n 21 September, 2OO1 (Faret Nlo ll5) strictly following the law laid dow.r ly Honourable Supremg courl of lndia in case of A.Shanmtlgiim vs Al:iya K R.K.M.N.P.Sarrgam en 27 April,2012. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.$UFASH, REP. FOR SRI V.SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Rpspon{ent [o.1 : GP FOR MEDICAL & HEAL tH The Court made tihe following: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITIoN No.85 06 0F 2()2s ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Sectio n e26 of Constitution of India seeking the foliowing relief/s:- i) ii) in) iu) ".. to issuc a Writ, order or direction more particularly one ill t]re nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the acrs or n""po"a""a-rrr". i i"],i-i'il.. l2-O3-2O25 in CC No.l19 of ZOZS *,t, a.frfr"r"," fri* -",la_eil'ts aifidavit dated "o,.rr,a. at para No.6 to 9, which consLirure rhe ollence.undcr sectton zzsii) "Tiin*iuyity"y. Sanhita, 2023, as being violative of law lard do$,n by Hontrle Constrtution Bench o[ Honble Supreme Court of lndia in ---_-. case o[Anita Kushwala vs. pushap Sudan on I9 July, ZOIO, Honbte High Court of A.p_ in case of Lakshmi Srnga Reddy And Aff. Vs Secretary, A.p. public Service, on 2f Septemtrer., ZOOf. Order dared 22 I 2025 in Writ petirion irr W.p.No.t65O of2025, Honble Supreme Court oI India in case of A.SI K.R.k M.N.p.sangam ."zi$^t,iifi.-' 'r'onanmusarn u" tuiv1 Hontle Supreme _Courr of India in case of Muthu I(aruppan vs parithi Itamvazhuthi & Anr on fSap.if, ZOfi, Hon,ble Supreme_ Court of India in case of Chiet Inforraration Comrnr. & Anr vs State Of Maniptir & Anr on fZ O...-t and consequent_ly refer a comptaint against the l{ Respondent_Dr.p.Vit.aya Lakshmi, before rhe iurisdicriona.r Magis*are comperen! t. ,.k the offence under secrion 229(t) or Bharativa Nyaya Sanhira ,dtt;\;il; Crininal Courrs, Hyderabad rhroush Reeistrar. J"ai.id, rj""t l. Hieia.r.i .-, iifr'". *"" done by rhis Honble Corrr in case of LoLh*i Sirrea Reddy and a.r.. ," Si...,"_,, A.p. priblic S.rv,cc. on 2t seprember. rool (para i,i..zii.",JJi ,.ii.i"-"u t" jaw tard rlown by Honbte supreme Cour or JnrUa ur ease ;i-;.i;;;r*._ vs Anya "Je"--r.;.;r K.R.K.M.N.p.Sangam vi) v) -- _ r, ... on 27 April, zorz p."" "rla "uJ.,ir1l'.-ra.'.....o.."..."

2. Heard Mr.B.Subash, learned Mr.V.Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government pleader for Medical and Health appearing for respondent No. 1 counsel representing

3. Having perused the pleadings and relief sought for, I am of the considered opinion that the matter is not one which ca, be seized by this Bench, invoking the extra ordinar5z jurisdiction, \ I I I l : l I 2 particularh. for t[e reason that the petitioner has otire| statutory remedv ar,'ailirb le to him under the provisions of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023'

4. In vit'u, r.,{ the same, this Writ Petition stands d sposed of' No costs Misct:L1anr:ous Petitions, pending if any, sha11 sl ar'd closed' SD/.K. AMMAJI DEPUl'Y REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 1 ?i P- Vijay-e L.akshmi, D/o P. Vasudev, Aged 47 yrs, Civit ,\sr;istant Surgeon, R/o 3-6-ii19 lJ;amitha Everest, SBH Colony, L B Nagar - l7t) Formerly Civil - Govt. Area Ho-spital, Assista.nl . Surgeon, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vanastha lipr rr arrr, Hyderabad - 500 070

2. The Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Deparlrne rt, Secretariat, Hyderab;rd, State of Telangana, - 028.

3. One CC to SRI /.SRINIVASA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs; tc (lP FOR MEDICAL & HEALTH, High Court f,:r the State of Telangana at Flvderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copie.s BSR BS ,,. HIGH COURT DATED:2110312025 . ., e ) ORDER WP.No.8506 of 2025 \. 1 C li'Ja /,5i + J .{S( z o n 21 tui Zt[5 t C5- Si)At ( lrE * ) -';;--ti DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 6 4 I .b 7 /q/