Irilahesh Chand v. Secretariat, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N TUKARAMJI
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No.'1 to 4 in interfering with peaceful possession of petitioners over residential premises H.No.7-1-95l2 situated at Ameerpet, Hyderabad situated behind Seeshamahal Takies. as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of The Constitution of lndia and consequently direct respondent Nos. 1 to 4 not to int: fere in the peaceful possession of petitioners over the above said premises l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 17242 OF 20161 Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co- 1 may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 not interfere with pea; eful possession of petitioneis in respect of residential building situated behinrl 3heeshmahal Takies bearing H.No.7- 1-95/2 situated at Ameerpet, Hyderabz I and further direct respondent Nos. I to 4 not to interfere in civil disput rs pending between petitioners and respondent Nos. 5 to 8 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. HARENDER PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI R. LAXMIKAII H RDDY, Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5to8: - The Court made the following: ORDER AGP FOR HO TE =€t:_-" ' -.-i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETIT ION No. 13810 0F 2016
OR DER:
l'his Writ l)edriorr is filcc1 r'rnder r\rticle 226 of Constitudon of India seeking thc folkrwing tclicVs: "...to tssue a \\''rit, ordcr or dirccttrrn nrore partrcularly one rn the naturc of Wrir o[ Nlanclrnus clcc)aring thc acrion of respondents Nos'1 ro 'l in ()l-Petl11()r]crs c>r'cr restdendal prcmiscs intcrtcring ,rr rth peaccftrl Posscssrcll \nrccrPct, I It clcrabad situatecl bchind I LN(r.7-1:95/2 sirr"t"J at Secshatnahal lakrcs. as beitlg artrtuarv' lcual aod violatir c of Arriclcs 14 ancl 21 of -Ihc Consttruuou of lndte ancl c< "rseclucndt' dircct resP()trdent Nos.1 to 4 [()t to iutcrflere in thc pceceful posscssion of pctirioners 'x-cr the ab<>vc satd prcmiscs aud pass such other t'rder or otdets as thrs Flonblc Court lna) dccin tlt and proper irr rh( circumstlnces of the casc" ' "
Hearcl NIr.Harencler Prasad, learned counsel [or the petiLioflcrs and Mr.R.Laxmikanth Rcddy, learned Assistant Government Plcader tbr Home appcaring for respondeflt Nos' 1to4
Learned counsel for thc pctitioners submits that, as respondenr Nos. 1 ro 4 have bcen interfering with the peaceful possession of the petiLioners over their residential premises, the present pcrition was filed. He iurther strbrnits that this Court, while . considering thc matter, passed an intcrim order dated 22'04'2016 t I 2 E direoing thc police authoritics not to intcrfer -' rvith thc cir.,il dispLrrc, and that such interirn protcction has effi, rivclv rer'lrcssed the qrievance oi the petitioncrs. r\ccorcling11,, lrc pr-ar-s that thc intcrirl orclcr bc rnade absolutc
J-earnccl -\ssistant Govcrnmcrrt Plcader ti r - I Lrrne hlrs not raisctl anv spccitlt: obiecuon
Havrng rcsard to the submissions advancc,l lncl in vicw of thc [:act tLrat tl-rc gricvance o[ thc pctitioners sl r rcls lesoh'cd by virtuc of tlre inter'iln order dated 22.01.201(t, rhis ( rurr hnds it just and propel to nrakc the said direction absolutc. .\<, ordingly, it is so ordcrcd.
With this clilecuon, this writ petition is clir roscd of. 'I'here shall be no ordcr as to costs Miscellaneous Petitions, pendinu if anv, shalr ;tancl closccl \ Ta, SD/. B.REKHA RANI A:i;ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// .. SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariz :, T.S.,Hyderabad. 2. The Asst. Commrssioner Punjagutta, Hyderabad. 3. The Station House Officer, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar Po ce Station Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad. The Sub lnspector of Police P.S., Sanleeva One CC to SRl. HARENDER PRASAD, Ad Reddy Nir tar, Hyderabad vocate t-9 FUC I 4
6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOI\,'IE (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI
Two CD Copies BM TKS ^lT , n HIGH COURT DATED:1710912025 1l I : S rt,i 2 I AN 2026 () ./' ORDER WP.No.13810 of 2016 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS N\1 rJ.\"
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.