High Court · 2025

6. Nagula Srinivas Goud, S/o Late Parsharam, Aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Vardavelli, R and R Colony, Boinpally Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. 7. Nagula Nagaraju, S/o Late Yellaiah, Aged 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o Vardavelli, R and R Colony, Boinpally Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.

8. Panduga Pradeep, s/o Laksmi Narayana, Aged 31 years, Occ. Sarpanch, Ri./o H.No.1-48, R.R.Colony, Vemulawada Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of, Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not re-allotting the plot bearing No.222 in favour of petitioner herein by considering the representation dated 02-12-2024 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to initiate criminal action against the unofficial respondents 5 to 8 for violation of the conditions of the patta certificate under the provisions of Section 7 (2) of Telangana State Assigned Lands Act, 1977. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition un,ler Serction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstlnces stated in the affidavit filerd in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent:; to delete the subsequent entries in the p:titioner plot bearing No.222 silua,:ed at Nampally H/o Shabashpally, Boinprllly Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla l)istrir;t already allotted to them, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest ot justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAVINDER REDDY SINGTREDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.5 TO 8: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI(AR REDDY IIIRIT PETITION No.7987 of 20.25 ORDDR: Sri S.Ravinder Reddy, Iearned counsel for the,.petitioner fairly submits that the issues involved in this writ petition is 6quarely covered t, by an order clated 27.02.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.5773 of

2025. \

2. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.l to 4 has not disputed the said fact.

3. The operative portion of the order dated 27.O2.2O25 passed in W.P.No.5773 of 2025 reads as under "4. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent authorities to examine the rePresentations, dated 07 .06.2024 and 02.12.2024 submitted by the petitioners and after issuing notice to all the interested persons consider the same aIrd pass aPpropriate reasoned order.ald communicate the decision thereon to the petitioners within a period of two (O2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There

5. shall be no order as to costs."

4. In view of aforesaid submissions and for the reasons assigned by this Cburt in the order dated 27.O2.2O25 passed in W.P.No.5773 of I 2 CVBR, J W.P.Nct.7987 of 2025 2O25, this Wri1. Pclrition is disposed of on same terms and with similar directions Miscelllneour; applications, iF any pending, sha1l s,and closed. There sha1l bt: no or-der as to costs //TRUE COPY// '1, SD/.T. TIRUMALA DEVI IDEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Princ,ipal S;ocretary, Revenue Department, Se\fetariat, HyJerabad, State \ of Telangana. Vemulaw ada.

2. The Distr ct Collector, Rajanna Sircilla District At RajannaSircilla. 3. The Reve,nue Drvisional Officer, Vemulawada, Rajanna Sircilla District At

4. The Tahsildar, \remulawada Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. 5. One CC to rSRl RAVINDER REDDY SINGIREDDY, Advocate |OPUCI 6. Two CCs to Gt'] FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of T()langana, at Hyderabacl. [CtLJT]

7. Two CD Ocpies (Along with a copy of the order dated 27.02.2025 in W.P.Nc,.5773 ot 2025) PSK BS S I b!.,B ,:,#r HIGH COL'RT DATED:17'1031i2025 ORDER WP.No.7987 orf 2025 $E S'lrli, 1 \ ( g oE APB 2t125 n t llg S P/rIl',d DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @)dt W HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BIIASKAR RTDDY WRIT PETITION No.5773 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is frled praying this Court to declare the action of the respondent authorities in not re-allotting the plots bearing Nos.270 and 205 in favour of the petitioners by considering their representaLions, dated 02.12.2024 ard

07.06.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the ArLicles 14, 2l and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and consequegtly, prayed to direct the respondents to initiate criminal action against respondent Nos.5 and 6 for violation of the conditions of the patta certificate under Section 7 (21 of the Telangana Assigrred Lands Act, 1977 .

2. It is stated that petitioner No.1 was allotted plot No.270 and father of petitioner No.2 by name Pabbathi Limbaiah was allotted plot No.205, admeasuring 242 square yards in Sy.No.451, situated at Nampally Revenue Village, Vemulawada Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District as their lands were submerged Mid Manaii Reservoir uid.e Gazette No.223, d,ated, L3.12.2010. It is further stated that after the death of father of petitioner No.2 i.e., Pabbathi Limbaiah, petitioner No.2 had succeeded the plot No.205. It is further stated that when respondent No.5, who , CVB& J tvp 5173 _2025 happens to be the Sarpalch of Shabashpally and having influencr: had fraudulently transferred their pattas in his name ald in the narne of respondent No.6, the petitioners ha'ze made representations, dated 07.06.2024 and O2. 12.2024 The grievancr: of tLre petitioners is that even after receiving :he said represen lation s, the respondent authorities did not consider the same. Hence this writ petition.

3. Coris;idt:red the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner arr(l learned Assistant Government PleaCer. for Assignm,:nt appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4 and wjth their consent, .his .rrit petition is being disposed at the aclmission stage. Ln vi:w of the nature of relief sought for in this writ petition, is;sua nce of notice to the unofficial responc.ents is dispensel here with.

4. In view of the above submissioris made by the learned counsel f,rr the respective parties, this Court, without expressirLg arl1' opinion on the merits of the matter, deems it appropriirtr: 1c) dispose of this writ petition directrng the responderLl a -rthorities to examine the representations, dated

07.06.202+ aod 02.12.2024 submitted by the petitionr:rs and after issrr:urg r: otice to all the interested persons consider the 3 CVBR, J Wp 5773 2025 same and pass appropriate reasoned order and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioners within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There sha-ll be no order as to costs

6. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if arty, shall stand closed

27.02.2025 JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY