✦ High Court of India · 17 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,099 words

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAMUS decraring the action of the respondents in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide for Domestic 3 phase, totar Domestic .l l. Load of 50OOO watts vicle Reg'No' NRg15254312794 connection to lhe petitioner in respect of the ftesidential Building' Plot No'484' in Survey No'25/P' admeasuring 167 sci yards' situated at Phase-1 ' Kancha Gar:hibowli (V)' Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC' Ranga Reddy District' T'S ' bounded by North Plot No.471 Sor-rth 1B Mtrs Wide Road East Plot No'485 West Plot No'483' And not providing electricity connection to the above referred premises as illegal and arbitrary. IA NO: 10 F 2025 petition under section i sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may rre pleased to direct the respondents 2 ro 7 ro process the apprication of the Petitioner to provide for Domestic '?' Phase' total Domestic Load of 50000 watts vide Reg'No' NR9152543127947c|onnectiontothepetitionerResidentialBuildingPlotNo.4S4' in Survey No.2SlP, admeasuring 167 sq' yards' situated at Phase-1 ' Kancha Gachibowli (V), Serilingampally (M)' Under GHMC' Ranga Reddy District' T'S'' bounded by North: t')lot No'47'l; South:18 Mtrs Wide Road; East: Plot No'485; West: Plot No.483. Gounsel for the Petitioner: SMT THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel forthe Respondent No'l: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No'2 to 7: SRIN'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the ResPondent No'8: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITI ON No.79OO OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is fited, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliei "...to issue tuit order or direction more particularlg one in the nqture of Writ of Mandamus d.eclaing the action of tle iespond.ents in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide for Domestic,3 Phase, total Dom.estic Inad of SOOOO watts uide Reg . No.NR915254312794 @nnection to the petitioner in respect of the Residential Building Plot No.4B4, in Surueg No.25/p, admeasuriig 167 sq. gards situated at phose- 1, Kancha Gachibou.tli (\), Senlingaipallg {!), .t 7.97 GHMC, Ranga Redd.g Di_stict, T.5., bounited Og U.orti H;t No.471; South: 18 Mtrs Wid_e Road; East: plot No 4gS; West: plot No.483. And not prouiding electicitA connection to the aboue referred premises as illegal and arbitrary and pctss..."

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government pleader for Energz for respondent No. 1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern power Distribution Company Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to Z and Sri .Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for reater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent o.8. l 2 PK,J \ p 19OA 2025

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covere<l by the order of this Court in W'P'No'24205 of 2024 dated Og.Og.2024, and requested this Court to pass similar order in the present \,Vrit Petition also' The same is not s'eriousiy disputed b]' the learned Government Pleader as well as learned Stancting Counsel for the respondents' in view of the above submissions ald for the reasons 5. alike in the order of this Court in W'P'No'24205 cf 2024' dated 09.09 ..2024, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the application ' dated ll.O3.2025,submittedbythepetitioners'forproviding Domestic 3 P)rase, total Domestic Load of 50000 w- atts uide Reg.No.NRgl5254312794 connection to the petitioners in respect of thr: Residential Building Plot No'484' in Survey No.25/P, admeasuring 167 sq' yards situated at Phase-l' Kancha Gachibowli (V), Serilingampally (M)' under GHMC' Ranga Red<1r' District, Telangana' and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible' preferably wil.hin a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subjectrto the petitioners // *ry 3 PK,J wP 79OO 2025 making necessary payment, AS stipulated under the Electricity Act, 2003. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/.A. SRINIVASA ASSISTANT REGI DDY TRAR //TRUE COPYII To, 1 SECTION OFFICER Ilfi"r|fJot:E3f0t;tt"t"ry Power and Enersv Department secretariat,

2. The Chairman-cum-Managing. Distribution company r_imlt-eoivrovJiiit'"uliIi'Blrnriisuda, Hyderabad. .Director, Telangana State Southern power

3. The Chief General Hyderabad Manager Commercial Mint Compound .TGSpDCL 4' The superintendino Enginger, Terangana State Southern power Distrib_ution compa ny L imited, Vioyu"th s",ld hr, s,#;jig:ria] Hvo era uao 5. The Divisional Engineer, Operaton Gachibowli, TGSPDCL 6. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Gachibowli, TGS,DCL 7. The Assistant Engineer, Operation Gachibowli, TGSPDCL 8. The Commissioner. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Circle 20, Tank 9. One CC to SMT THAKUR ROOPA S|NGH, Advocate tOpUCI 'l0.One CC to SRt N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL tOpUCl 11.One CC to SRt G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] 12.Two CCs to Gp FOR ENERG', High Court for the State of Telangana at Bund Road, Hyderabao. Hyderabad [OUT]

13.Two CD Copies a BS BS I f CC TODAY 1tl EST A I€- ( *);i 2 1 tltAB 2025 P l) t {). . + HIGH COURT DATED:1710312025 ORDER WP.No.7900 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS a ,{

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments