✦ High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025

Hafeezbabanagar, Chandrayangutta, Balapur v. Eramanzil X Road, Hyd

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Oct 2025
Length
1,016 words

Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri N.S.Bhakara Rao : Sri Jagathpat Reddy Kasi Reddy Counset for the Respondont No.{ & 3 : None Appearcd The Gourt made the iollowing : JUDGMENT TIIE HON'BLE SRI JI.]STICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. o.415 of 2024 JTII}GMIINT: Learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported that the matter has been refbned to the Lok Adalar constituted by the High Court Legal Services Comrnittee, Hyderabad, for settlemen! and after due deliberations, the L,ok Adalat passed an award on I I I

13.09,,2025 as per the terms agreed upon by the parties.

2. In view of rhe aforesaid subrnission, this Appeal is disposed of in terns of the a.,varri dated 1.3,09.21J25 passed by the High Court Legal Services Coriirnittee . No costs.

3. As ,r sequel, rriiscellaneous pelitions pending if any shall stands closed. sD/-, ASSIS /,TRUE COPY/' SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chaimtan, MACT Cunr XlAdditional Chief Judge Gity Civil Courtat t]vderabad. (enclosing a copy of Award passed by LolcAdalat). 2. One CC to Sri Jagathpal Reddy Kasi Reddy, Advocate tOpU'Cl 3. One CC to Sri N.S.Bhaskara Rao, Advocatl 1OeUC1 4. Two CD Copies I svs w (Along with a copy of award dated 13.09.2025 by Lok Adalat) ':, 3! t.

1. HIGH COURT TE 25t10t2025 JUDGIIfl.ENT No.415 of ZAZ4 DISPOSING OF THE MACII,IA (, -:-) :..] HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMIITEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERAEAD [Under Sectlon 19 of the Legat SeMces Authoritles Actr {987 (Cenr,- a L3-O9-2025 PresenH 1. Hon'ble Justke Sri G.V.Seethapathy, (Fonner Judge of erstnvlrlte Andtrra pradesh Hlih Courtl Chairman

2. Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, lr{ember M.A.C.M.A.NO.41 5 of 2024 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGATNST (On the fite of the triotor Ac M.V.O.p,No.235g of 20i g City Civit Courts at Hyderabad) : X Additionat Chief Judge, - ----' Between: {qhgqred Pasha, S/o. Mohammed Abbas, {Sea, f0 Years, Occupation: Ex-Auto Driver, llg H.No. 18-12-419tct 1852, Hafez Babanagar, ' C-Btock, Bandtaguda, Kachan Bagh, Hyderabaf. ', ' ...Petitioner AND l,.lylohammed Zaheeruddin, S/o. lilotrammed Mahmood Ati ' Aged: Major, Occupation: Owner of the Car Bearing No. TS-1 1UA-57 19, R/o. 1 8-1O- 3Bt H t 1 Hafeezbabanagar, Chandrayangutta, Balapur, lA,7l3, .t.s...t.vvs 6la,

2. Bajaj Atliance General lnsurance Company Limited, Igprgsgnted by its Branch Manager, Tp Ctaims HUB; 4s North fast Plaza, Opp: Khairatabad RTA Office, Eramanzil X Road, Hyderabad.

3. Syed Liyas Ut Hasan, S/o. Late Syed Siraj Ul Hasan, $.a -"!out: 30 yrs, Occupation: Driver, R/o.H.No.1 8-1-350tlt 16gt A, Gutashen lqbal Cotony, Chindrayangutta, Hyderabj. Counset for Appettant/petitioner : Sri Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Legat ...Respondents/Respondents Srinivas, Advocate 'I Devarasetty, This appeat having been referred for settlement hearing the Learned counser for the parties and also is passed: this lok Adalat aM after partfes, the fOtlowing award t Com by the Tribunat Awarded AWARD nsS,.e0,ZZgl- (Rupeesi Five lakhs eigh hundred ard twenty kght onty) with interest at 7.5% p.a from the date of ty thousand antt ippn proportionate "*\ d( Petition titt the date Jf deposit. I p appeat referred Appettant tioner This aggrierred by the Award passed in MVOP.No.2358 of 2018 by the itotor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat-cum-Xl Additional Chief Judge; City Civit Court at Hyderabad. sri P.Chaitanya Ramana, E:tecutive Tralnee of lnqgrance company- Respondent No.2 and the Appettant/Petitioner have appeared before the tok Matat. During the pendency of this Appeat, the Appettant/Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 ' lnsurance Company have enteied into'a setttement and in pursuance of the same, the Appettants/Petltioner has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.1,50,fiD/- (Rupees One lakh: fffty thousand onty) torrvards futl and final setttement in addition to the amount atready depocited and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same. Accordingly, compromise is recorded alrd the case is settled before the Lok Adatat- ln terms of the said settlement, Respondent No.2'lnsurance has agrced to pay above agreed amount within a period of one (t) m6nth from the date of receiPt of a copy of this award' ln the er/ent of defautt or detay in making srch dePosit, the Appettant/Petitioner is entitted to ctafun interest as award€d by the Tribunal. SEF C) HIGH couEr LOK AOAIAT * Qaie dI Apportionment of Compemation, if anY Additional Direction(sl:

1. The Appettants/claimants are entitled to the refund of court Fee paid in this case' 2. The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance company, if any, stratl be given l. soon iiier aeposit by the lnsurance Company, the Appetlant/Petitioner is permitted credit to. to withdraw the entire amount. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of. Pt vofi^, ,?;]3ffil.,-t9. Appetta nt (s) 4,,* , b d'r* ls+ CCc 1,.? . q t 4 Lac t rod, pg-qb) for Bajaj Authorised Co. Ltd. itc). ,'. Counsel o t ) 2_IS60, ittee) * *

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments