Street No.l, Tarnaka, Secunderabad tV. Anjaneyulu S/o v. Venkateswarlu, Aged about

4ilSmr. s. Sabnha w/o s. srinivas r' Aged about 29 years, Occ House wile Flat N0.302, Block -A Sri Sai Opf. Siris Hospiral, S! No 8, Habsiguda, Hyderabad t Smt M. Krishna veni Wo M. Ram Mohan Rao Aged about 43 years. Occ; House Wife BJo Plot No.47, St. No. I I, HMT Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad-76 L ; Smt K. Ashwini w/o S. Garesh Aged about ?8 years, Occ: House Wife Uo Plot No l4l, Hanumanpet, Hyderabad 6 Snlt T. Swarhi wo T. Purnachandra Reddy AJed abour 24 years, Occ House Wife tuo H. No. 2-l-2l17, Saraswathinagar, Uppal, Hyderabad-39 1 V. Rant Gopal S/o V Satyananda Rao Aged about 33 years, Occ: Soft Ware engineer PJo H. No l2-5-145/2, Tarnaka, Secundarabad I @ Smt. D. Snohalatha W/o D. Venugopal Reddy Aged about 39 yeals, Occ. House Wile R-/o l21206, HLrDA Complex, Saroornagar. Hyderabad I { Smr. f Manula Rani w/o P Kr ishna Mohan ' Aged abou! 46 years, Occ: House W:fe C/o P Krishna Mohan, 308, Prema Sagar, Ta.naka, I2-13-254, Street No.I5, S ecunderabad- I 7) l'r@ A Sudhakar Rao S,o A. Venkar Rao ' Aged about 19 years, Occ Go'"t Service FIat N0.203, Sai Vihar, Scientist Colony, Habsiguda, Hyderabad [ ! 4 r Ctanara Iuohan Rao S/o K. Sesh Mohan ' Aged about 48 years, Occ. Business Plot No 145, H. No. l6- I 1.20lA/2, Malakpet, Hyderabad e / I \ \ t) l1 q { ,,} a i I lLt O C. Haflumanlha Reddy S,o Ch. Raja Papi Reddy ' I Aged about 50 years, occ Conrractor' l-4-2, Skeet No.7, Habsiguda, Secunderabad / ( JA C Sahirhy D/o C Hanu,nanrha Redd) '- Aged about 22 years, Occ. Student 'l-,1-2, StreetNo.T, Habsig!da, Secunderabad f 6ld c. anrna:,u olo Dr. C r.\ Reddy Aged about 23 years, Occ; Student Street No. l, Tarnaka, Secunderabad l'l fr Snl E Sailaiaa Wo F Surender Reddy " I Aged about 43 years. Occ House Wife 8.12-28, Plot No.12l, StreetNo.S, Habsiguda, Secunderabad I q 6' v. Narasrmnudu S/o lare M. Ramulu Aged about 36 years, Occ: Physio Therapist 30I, Kalyana Avenue, G.K. colony, Sainikpr.rri, Secunderabad-g4 I I l?. G. Santtrosl nao S/o G Yathr Raja Rao Aged about 42 years. Occ: Employee H No. l9-58/D, Teachers Colony, Kalyanpuri, Uppal, Hyderabad-39 ?,,D O. Y . Mahender S/o Buchaiah Aged about 43 yeam. Occ: Employee Flat No 303, Devi Jayana Apanments Keslravanagar Colony, Opp: RRB, Mettuguda, Secunderabad-17 , )-l g. S.t K Parwathy w o K. Chandra Mohan Rao Aged about 40 years. Occ Business PIot No i 5 0, H. No. I 6- I l -20lA/2, Malakpet, Hyderabad-36 12'fr K. Mohan Seslra Sai Ashok S/o K. Chand|a Mohan Rao Aged about l0 years, H. No. l6-1 1-20/A/2, Malakpet, Hyderabad-36 l--9 g.*. Venkareshwarlu S/l K Sesh Mohan Aged abor"rt 5l years, Occ Business H. No. 16-1i-20/4/2, Malakpet. Hyderabad-36 ?2. V. Mohar Murali S/o V Laxmaiah Aged about 47 years, Occ Private Service H. No I2-11-290. Warasiguda. Secunderabad i, A Smt. A. Sarojini Devi Wo A Yadagiri Reddy Aged abcut 50 years, Occ House Wife H. No. l-9-2521911 l9/4, Ram \agar, Hvderabad ?L *.r,L.Chandra Sekhar Reddy S/o M Venkat Reddy Aged about 32 years, Occr Private Employee H. No. l2- 10"587/84, Seettiafalmandi, Secunderabad-61 '/-l fl SrL V VimalaU oDr.V Ram Reddy ' Aged about 49 years, Occ. House Wife 01, Akshitha Apanments, Vijayapuri Colony Tarnaka, Secunderabad )A @. Smt. P Surekha W/o Madhusudan Reddy Aged about 39 years, Occ Teacher l -4-63l7. Snehanagar Colony Streel No.8, Habslg!da, Hyderabac \. t .v-11 -z-o/A/2, Mal akper, Hvdera6ad I

29. M. Venkat Ram Reddy, S/o late Raji Reddy Aged about 27 years , Occ Agriculture Vidyaranyapuri, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. (R3 to 29 are impleaded as per Court Order dated 3111I?OOG in WPMP No. 25649/2000) .... RESP.NDENTS Petition under Arttcle 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus 'by declaring the order dt. 30-4-1 993 in proceedings G2146'1111976 on the file of 2nd respondent and as confirmed in prqcaedings ULC Appeal Hyderabadl143l1993, dl. 11-9-2002 on the file of 1st respon{pnt and notice U/S 10(5) of ULC Act as illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitulional N 1 PM .NO 241 6 F20 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitjon, the High Cpurt may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pu;suant to the ordgr dt. 30-4-1993 ln proceedings G2. No /4611/1970 on the file of 2nd respondent and as confirmed in proeeedings pLQ Appeat l-iyderabad/143/1993, dt. 11-9=2002 on the file of 1st respondent and nqlige U/S '!0(5) of ULC Act Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent Nos, 1&2: GF FOR ASSIGNMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3to29: QRI A. RAVINDER REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.18424 of 2OO4 ORDER: The rvrit petitiod is filed seeking the following prayer: "to issue a Writ order or direction more particularlg one in the nature of uit of Mandamus bg declaing the order dt. 30-4- 1993 in proceedings G2/ 461 1/ 1976 on the file of 2"d respondent and as confirmed in proceedings ULC Appeal Hyderabad/ 143/ 1993, dt.11-9-2002 on the file of 1"r respondent and nolice U/ S 105 of AC Act as illegal arbitrary and uncon stih-ttional. "

2. Heard Sri Vivek Jain, learned Counsel appeadng for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Assignments, \ appearing for Respondent Nos. I and 2, I I

3. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner produced a copy of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No. lB425 of 2004'and batch, dated

24.11.2011, in which this Court has passed the following order: "ln the light of Section 4 of the Repeal Act and hauing regard to the admitted fact that the possession of the land pursuant to the impugned ord.ers has not been taken from the petitioners, the impugned proceedings stood abated. Hence, no further enquiry is necessary and all the Wit petitions are accordingly disposed of. 1Vo Costs. " T: - ,.-"'-- 2

4. Learned Government Pleader for assignment did not dispute the same.

5. In view of the orders passed in W.P.No.18424 ol 2OO4 and batch dated 24.11,2011, this writ petition is disposed of and no further enquiry is necessaqz.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shali stand closed. \ To, SD/-T, TIRUMALA DEVI ANT REGISTRAR ASSI I ,TRUE COPY// TION OFFICER A.P. Hvderabad.

1. Thetommissioner Appeals, Olo Chief Commissioner' Land Administration' , ?ii.s,iJ"]r'i-dfrcer and Competent Autholitv' ULc' Hvderabad l, ?'l: 83il"tSl PyFll$U^ffiftTlB[of.'"?*'or the state or rerangana r 3#€t?i3o-loX-AAvr N DER BEDov, eavoca6'1oeuc1 6. Two CD Copies (p- BM BS I HIGH COURT I DATED:1210212025 I ORDER WP.No.18424 of 2004 /.t/ H IIJ [, f, ( ? rHE $Lq i6 03 APR 206 't' C: ), t) ':li oa ICt\E() DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITI.TOUT COSTS (A- ?t. a 6