The High Court · 2025

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ihe High Court may be pleased to suspend the notices issued by the 4th. rr:spondent vide C. No. 1 1 B/Crime/DSP-ClD/RO-Wg 1 /201 2-1 6 dated 1 6.06.1:C 1 6 to the petitioners and not to harass the petitioners in any manner pe:nding disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 25242 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to collect the call records of the 9440700924 from the month of January, 2016 to Ma,r, 20'l 6 and collect the voice recorrjing of the calls in between Phone N os. 9440700920 and 9848121291 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.20595 OF 2016 ORDER: This Vrit Petition h filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following reliefls:- "... to issue a writ, direcrion, order or orden more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMIIS declaring the notices issued by the 4th respondent vide C No. 118/Gime/DSP- CD/RG!(g1 /2012-16 dated 16.06.2016 to the peritioners as illegal, a6itrary malafidy, ultravins, unwan'anred, lughhanded and in violation of Anicle 2l ol the Constitution of India and set aside the same and direct the 2nd respondent ro take appropriate action against the 6th respondent for illegal threaa and demands made against the petitionen in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders that are deems fir and proper under dre circumstances of the case... . ." 2 None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. I have heard l4r.Rlaxmikanth Reddy, Ieamed fusistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6.

4. kamed fusistant Govemment Pleader for Home submits that Crime No.118 of 2012, registered for the offences punishabie under Sectiors 498-,4. and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as z Sections 3 and + of the Dowry Prohibition Act, .v115 taken on the file of the leamed I Additional Judicial Fint (llass Magistrate, 'Warangal, as CC. No.55l of 2012. IJpon conclusion of the trial, accused Nos.1 to 5 were acquimed of all charjes. It is funher submitted that a request for further investiga;ion was d"ly consi&red by the Depury Superintendent of I'olice, CID-RO, Warangal, who reported that no further ir:vestigation warranted. Permission was also sought from rhe Additional Director General of Police,, CID, Telangana Statt:, Hlderabad, to drop any further action in the rnatter. Jn *riew of these developments, it is contended that nothing ru>rv survives for adudication in the present writ petition.

5. I have pensed the materials on record.

6. The grie,rance of the petitioners in this writ peririon perrains to the issuance of notice under Section 91 of the (bde of Criminal Procedure by the Superintendent of Pol-ice, resp,rndent No.4, to petitioner No.1, as well as to the threats and dr:rnands allegedly made by respondent No.6. Howevet as reportec[ by the learned /a /, 3 Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home, the entire cause sct up by the petitionen has already been considered by the comperent Crurt, which ultimately acquimed rhem of the charges. In view of such subsequent developments, further exarnination of the lsSUCS raised in the writ petition is rendered unnecessary. Accordingly, as the cause of action has become infructuous, the writ petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to cosrs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. B. REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// one CC to SRl. KAI\IBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Advocate [OPUCI ' Y;; ;;Ji""d'F 'F"CjR Hor"lE .iiigh court for the state of relansana at Hvderabad [OUT Triro CD CoPies 1 \ To, 1 2 3 Btu GJP \ \ t .,; .-) \ 2 8 llIU frItr { {i, 4qr-,tlO HIGH COURT DATED:1210812025 ORDER WP.No.20595 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS b )A \\\ ot\