✦ High Court of India · 13 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,007 words

Acts & Sections

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue writ' order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents in making attempts to mark and undertake road construction or any other related work rn lands of the petitioner situated in Sy'No' 15/B of Pasaramadla Village' Janagaon Mandal and District' without there being any notification and without issuing any notice or without ,==@ Paying cc m :e,r siation to t consequert / <tirect ,n" .:" ""t"'oner acquisitiorr crf land of ,h" r:::ono"nts undertake conrilrrction ,",,r.lll"':t ""0 ""it'"n t;;Pensation Trust, as who to pay irlegal and arbitrary and for the proposed our rands and ""r;."' ;;-;"J::":,". rities ror the ,,"r; l.A. NO :1 O F :20?5 Petitror t_/rlrjsp 5s61 xl.:I;l:::[]tTJ";:iff ;Trx,;,:::tr:xffi ton^*"n stop any kind of laying the rca(:. rf )o lction activity o"ing "onr,. the petitionr:r r; l : nd in Sy.No.115iB s t,ar:d,,,,'n otherwise, th-. :)etrtroner ,.,""t""0'" ":::"J; activity ir cluding marking' uO"n, of Ac.8-26,,.'-:j ::ll,i.,iilt;:: :; village' Jangaon Ma-rdal and District, as .tst will suffer irreparable loss and hardrship. 'na",.t, Counsel for the F,e titioner : SRI GANTA RAMAKRTSHNA SSlE?Ji.lE^ff;[it;ff$,ll : SRr GAD, 'RAVEEN KUr!,rAR, DEpury Counsel for the R,3;pondent Nos.2 & 4 : SRI M.RAMU Counsel for the Re:;pondent No.3 : G.p FOR TRANSPORT Counsel for the Rer;pondent Nos.S & 6 : G.p FOR REVENUE Counsel for the lle.s [)ondent No.7 : SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY The Court macle the l,ollowing ORDER s w N No. 18 of 022 5 r resPondents Village' This writ Petition s frled to declare the acdon of making attempts to mark and under@ke related work in lands of the or any other road construction 5/B of Pasaramadla petitioner situated in SY'No'1 ct without there being anY J anagaon Mandal and Distri anY notice or without notification and without issulrrg oner Trust as illegal and to ttre petiti paying compensadon respondents to pay arbitrary and consequently direct sition o[ land of the compensation for ttre proposed acqul petitioner until suctr time; not to mark the Petitioner's land and undertake construction activities for the proposed by- pass road.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioner is a Trust registered uide registration No' 1O36 dated 28.02.1982 and is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac'8-26 gts'' at Sy'No'115/B' Janagaon District uide Pasaramadla Village' Doc.No.124711983 dated

19.09. 1983; Doc.No.332/ 1987 i ) i I I :'d i)9.63.1987 par_t; res p( It is th" p con*;t, uctron activities. In . that subrnr :tc J a and Doc.j o'l9o/ 1981'dated 10.o1.1987 .:,rr:mitted that petitio "t Trust has 6rot : ssued with : da r passbook ,"o. *n"t things strod thus, rn Jent Nos.2 to 7 were , seen entering inlo .re lalds of (-'titirtners and were making plans to urrden.ake some regard, peutirtner has representation on 17.02.2025 to Revenue Divisioirzrr Officer marking a copy'to National Higbway Authon ti,:; Thereafter, on O3.O3.2O25 respondents have again e n r r.r.ed into petitioner,s land aJong wit.h J CB and other nra,-.ilnery. petitioner has again submitl_ed ra. follow up leltt r to the RDO and requested to stop all the constr,.1( tr rr activities. euestioning the same, r-he cresent writ pt I i r, r r is filed . Acquisrtr r,' rvould submit l. -i ;r-ne d Assistalt Government pleader for Land that +retitioner is only however, under,-ake s that appreh:r rcl rr_g the acquisition responrlt r I .rr:thorities would follow due proc()ss of law before ir- tr t rng an_v acquisition in respect of 1;etit ioner's L i + 3 - *.+- j#ai€i=i_+{.d--'i':i*sl is onlY aPPrehending

4. Since the Petitioner acquisition and till date' no constructions have taken Place in the Petitioner's hnd, and also leamed Assistant Government Pleader undeftakes to follow due Process of law, this Court deems it apProPriate to disPose of the writ i. iili"r,'ail aiitiioritie" to follow petition with a directron due Process of law before initiatirig anY action on the petitioner's land' Recording the submissions of learned counsel on 5 either side, this writ Petition rs disPosed of' Miscellaneous Petitions' Pending' if anY' 'shall closed. However' there shall be no order as to costs /TTRUE GOPY// r:r"{it-''l"lt?[iF SECTION OFFICER To

1. The

2. The nsport and Tra ew Delhi Parliament Street' of lndia, Ministry of Secretary, Government -1, Chairman, National HighwaYs AuthoritY of lndia (NHAI), G5 and 6' rt Bhavan His hways TransPo Dab rigungaon, Rd Sector 10' Dwaraka Delhi The Secretary' Transport DePartment' Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hvclerabad. .rnal il:::::rus;?ji'j;i3[ffi : il: ;;ila ;",", I ) i i' o n t't uno ul J a ns aon D i stri ct' rhe panchavat secretary, "Ji''iii"it' District. ( $r Hiqhways, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad. j,ig#,:l,"s'onDistrict vitlage' Jangaon Mandal' Jangaon

3. 4 6 7 8 Iyo C I's to c.p FOR F ,., Hydr-:r.; b 1 J lourl "'' RE,ENUE, High Court for .the ,d[*d;ilil:::::ffi'j s;tate of Telangana at ",,"n"n" *,, igllfllli ijF .' ,X,?,i,;1,.11;fft Pi"?3,*"EEi;;ijilX"J, sol,c,roR ( jEN oF li.i,i5 85 5:;nt REDD', Advocate (opuc) r pneoLep \ SA GJP HIGH CoLrRT DATED:'litA3t2O2S \ I i ) I I ORDER WP.No.Zliit} of 202i -'\ r\t .> ,- /4: a^ oB ( c 2 5 ,t tH '025 (f,( z a * DISPOSIi\|G OF THE W.p WITHOUT COSTS. --+ _,-- 7t[r ' \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments